This is obviously false. His support is highly conditional.They disagree with Tstorm's unwavering support of the government, obviously they are psychotic.
Everyone angry at traffic who isn't barricading roads.Source?
Yes, those people were nuts. Upset about taxes, they picked a fight with armed soldiers, then lost the fight badly. Most of the soldiers were entirely acquitted, 2 with minimal punishment, their actions justified by the circumstance. The Boston Massacre is more significant in the history of propaganda than the conflict itself, with artists and writers mythologizing the event in real time. The idiots who got themselves shot are meaningless, the people that managed to transform the event into a rallying cry for a movement that became a new nation conceived in liberty are the real story worth telling.So then here's a famous outbreak of mass psychosis from history.
No, those people are all nuts. That's always my point. That's not a carefully formed act of insurrection, attempting to overthrow the government at the behest of Donald Trump, that's a crowd of people who have lost their mind turning into a riot. I remember the day that happened, a co-worker was watching the coverage at work. This co-worker is so Republican, they named their first born after Ronald Reagan, and their exact words on the event were "these people are nuts".Meanwhile there's this march, which to listen to you was more like a rational march of American heroes defending American values that got a bit too exuberant.
So whataboutism, then.You criticize me for not condemning people outside of these forums enough, but can't figure out what to do about the people in here whose posts you read and react to daily.
Of course he has. It is amazing how quickly Trump supporters will shift gears. Reasoning exists to back-justify the most recent declarations of Dear Leader.And... have you actually watched videos about how your president behaves? I can only assume not.
orDonald Trump said:“We can take the Senate pretty easily, and I think with our little secret we are gonna do really well with the House. Our little secret is having a big impact. He and I have a little secret – we will tell you what it is when the race is over.”
Donald Trump said:"He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide."
seems like the kind of people they're looking for.If this were anyone else, nobody would be speculating that he took that job explicitly hoping this would be the outcome.
But you are objecting to calm suggestion that everyone can be understoodand giving great latitude to people that want to accelerate conflict and make the nation collapse, which is highly dysfunctional.So yes, i object more to that than i do to some other forum members being a bit mean about a man who unnecessarily gunned a woman down. Its a functional sense of perspective.
No, I'm not, because that's not what you offered. I agree everyone can be understood. But the understanding you're insisting we accept is based on foolish assumptions and crafted to excuse heinous actions. I have a different understanding.But you are objecting to calm suggestion that everyone can be understood
Hysteria. I'm merely commenting on the forum posts I find more objectionable, which are yours.and giving great latitude to people that want to accelerate conflict and make the nation collapse, which is highly dysfunctional.
Without an external source this statement amounts to "trust me, bro".Everyone angry at traffic who isn't barricading roads.
No, you can trust yourself as well, unless you think people don't think barricading traffic is nuts, and then you may also be nuts.Without an external source this statement amounts to "trust me, bro".
Your understanding is blind hatred that will only inspire further acts of violence.I have a different understanding.
by ICEYour understanding is blind hatred that will only inspire further acts of violence.
42% of the country is in favor of abolishing ICE. They aren't just against what ICE is currently doing, 42% of the country thinks that the entire organization is too corrupt and dysfunctional to continue existing at all. 67% of people think that ICE isn't properly doing their jobs and that their tactics are too forceful.There is something here you don't know that you have no way of knowing so I can't blame you: the overwhelming majority of America thinks these people are psychos. Even the ones who agree with them generally think they are psychos. Barricading the road and taunting law enforcement is psychotic. It's not just ICE thinking that, it's not just Republicans thinking that, it's everyone in the country capable of existing outside of the internet. Their PR is not perfect, but even if it were, it would just make some percentage of people slightly more comfortable in the general position that they already hold that anyone obstructing them with vehicles is a psycho. Maybe that's a normal day in France, but here that behavior is reserved for complete lunatics.
So are you saying that if I agree with your assessment of the situation I have that as a proof and if I disagree I may simply be nuts?No, you can trust yourself as well, unless you think people don't think barricading traffic is nuts, and then you may also be nuts.
It is your explanation here that seeks to excuse the acts of violence that occured, and ensure the perpetrator faces no real repercussions. That's what would open the door to further abuse and further acts.Your understanding is blind hatred that will only inspire further acts of violence.
If there were research posted on the internet, it wouldn't be something you know just by talking to regular people who live here.So are you saying that if I agree with your assessment of the situation I have that as a proof and if I disagree I may simply be nuts?
I'm sorry, this conversation started with you claiming Hades, a European, had too little insight into American attitudes to gauge public perception, yet now you are claiming I, another European, will be able to infer the attitudes by thinking. I don't have any more insight than Hades as far as I'm aware, so it remains on the level of "trust me, bro",
And most of even those people think people blocking ICE with their cars are nuts. You can think Democrats cheated in 2020 and still know the Jan 6ers were all crazy. You can hate Charlie Kirk and still know the guy who shot him is a lunatic.42% of the country is in favor of abolishing ICE. They aren't just against what ICE is currently doing, 42% of the country thinks that the entire organization is too corrupt and dysfunctional to continue existing at all. 67% of people think that ICE isn't properly doing their jobs and that their tactics are too forceful.
I told you I would likely put him in jail for manslaughter.It is your explanation here that seeks to excuse the acts of violence that occured, and ensure the perpetrator faces no real repercussions. That's what would open the door to further abuse and further acts.
More people were deported by ICE last year than in the previous 4 years put together. 59,000 (2021) + 72,000 (2022) + 143,000 (2023) + 271,000 (2024) = 545,000 deportations. 2025 had 605,000. Those 4 years combined from your source had 28 deaths, a rate of 5.14 per 100,000 deportations. 2025 had 32 deaths, a rate of 5.29 per 100,000, a <3% increase from the previous administration. The total being this high now is a rather large jump in absolute terms, but the rates of things are parallel, and notably the pattern of deportations doubling each year is a continuation from the previous administration, and almost certainly related to the use of the CBP One app, which granted people entry with minimal oversight and had ICE as the only mechanism available to remove people whose asylum claims are denied after they're already living in the US, other than them receiving that notice and leaving on their own.More people died in ICE custody in the previous year than in the previous 4 put together, and it's the highest number in 2 decades.