The "Cancellation" of J.K. Rowling

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,209
6,481
118
As an aside, I still think it's incredibly dumb that the one thing, the one thing, that everyone thinks about when they think about what makes spiders special is not one of Spider-Man's powers but is something he just so happened to invent.
Yes. Bluntly, that's sort of stupid. That he could organically shoot silk threads is totally what he should be able to organically do. If spiderman merely has strength proportional to size as a spider and can climb up walls, he could be named after pretty much any arthropod.

Although of course the comic plays fast and loose with the webbing - but then they have to have some artistic licence so its not worth criticising heavily. Anyone watching a spider will notice the webs are the result of time-consuming construction. I took this photo myself - it's a common garden spider and you can see the spider pulling the silk from its spinnerets and drawing it into position with its rear leg. Makes me wish I had a really good camera - I've only got a high end point and click, the bridge and SLRs would be so much better for this kind of thing.
1593513232944.jpeg
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,923
1,791
118
Country
United Kingdom
Those actually creep me out a bit as well. like what about people wearing a leotard or catsuit?
All urinals have clear limitations. For one, you can't shit in them (well, I guess you can, but you shouldn't) so they don't replace the need for conventional stall toilets. However, they do take pressure off and make the whole process faster for everyone. Even if I felt confident using women's bathrooms, I'd probably still prefer men's bathrooms (even if I was presenting feminine) just because they're so much more private. Sure, men are terrifying, but the thought of having to stand around being observed and clocked in a gendered bathroom while waiting for a stall is way more terrifying. You never have to queue in a mens bathroom because most men just use urinals, you do your business and get out before anyone has a chance to say anything. For anything requiring privacy or urgency, having urinals is a massive positive because it gets rid of all the people who just need to pee.

I think cis people massively massively overestimate how much any trans person actually wants to use their public bathrooms.

Well, there's no ambiguity about her position now. If you think trans women are women, you are dead to her.
I was wondering if someone would post that.

At this point, I doubt anyone who hasn't already figured it out is ever going to be convinced, but who knows.
 

Aegix Drakan

♪ Megalovania is a genre ♪
Legacy
Apr 30, 2020
174
132
48
Canada
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Well, there's no ambiguity about her position now. If you think trans women are women, you are dead to her.

Yeah, I saw that. That's legendarily petty.

King's "Yes, trans women are women" wasn't done in a hostile or threatening or aggressive manner. It was stated as plain fact, no extra emotions. It wasn't even directed AT her.

And she STILL got that petty over it.

At this point...There's no possible other explanation. Either Rowling is so damn fragile that even someone believing trans women are women is enough to make her feel attacked (eww), or she's actually full on bigoted and hateful towards trans women (super ewww). At this point, probably both.

As far as I'm concerned, Rowling is dead to me. I'm actually upset that I took my Harry Potter books to my new home instead of taking the Artemis Fowl books. -_-
 

Tireseas

Plaguegirl
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
262
117
48
Seattle
Country
United States
Gender
Trans Woman
As far as I'm concerned, Rowling is dead to me. I'm actually upset that I took my Harry Potter books to my new home instead of taking the Artemis Fowl books. -_-
While I'm pretty sure I don't need to say this, avoid the Disney movie. They made the mistake of taking some serious liberties with interpreting the plot for cinema that undermined the whole point of the series...
 

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
While I'm pretty sure I don't need to say this, avoid the Disney movie. They made the mistake of taking some serious liberties with interpreting the plot for cinema that undermined the whole point of the series...
Oh, the Artemis Fowl movie already came out?

Good, I'll pretend that it never even existed and preserve my childhood memories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwarvenhobble

Aegix Drakan

♪ Megalovania is a genre ♪
Legacy
Apr 30, 2020
174
132
48
Canada
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
While I'm pretty sure I don't need to say this, avoid the Disney movie. They made the mistake of taking some serious liberties with interpreting the plot for cinema that undermined the whole point of the series...
Yup, the trailer alone broke me.

Which, incidentally, is why I miss the books. I wanna cleanse my palette with the actual GOOD stuff.
 

Tireseas

Plaguegirl
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
262
117
48
Seattle
Country
United States
Gender
Trans Woman
Oh, the Artemis Fowl movie already came out?

Good, I'll pretend that it never even existed and preserve my childhood memories.
They dumped it on Disney+. The reviews have been dismal. My guess is that whoever green-lit the movie was hoping for a Potter-like franchise and will blame any poor performance on COVID-19 rather than decisions that were almost certainly made at the producer level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwarvenhobble

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
29,385
12,230
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
In other news JK Rowling just blocked Stephen King on Twitter. I hate Twitter, but I find that hilarious. She just can't see being called wrong. So much for having respect for your idol, JK.
 
Last edited:

Palindromemordnilap

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 12, 2020
211
95
33
Country
United Kingdom
While I'm pretty sure I don't need to say this, avoid the Disney movie. They made the mistake of taking some serious liberties with interpreting the plot for cinema that undermined the whole point of the series...
"Serious liberties" here meaning "The film borders on being in-name only there's so little of the book left in it"
 

Aegix Drakan

♪ Megalovania is a genre ♪
Legacy
Apr 30, 2020
174
132
48
Canada
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
In other news JK Rowling just blocked Stephen King on Twitter. I hate Twitter, but I find that hilarious. She just can't see him being called wrong. So much for having so much having respect for your idol, JK.
That's legit? She actually blocked him over this? :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,856
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
Mmm. I'm really enjoying this now. Two big media figures being involved means this might just finally spark the war between transexual advocates and feminists.



Hopefully it leads to all the contradictions between the two actually getting addressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwarvenhobble

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,160
969
118
Country
USA
Hopefully it leads to all the contradictions between the two actually getting addressed.
I've been eating that popcorn for a decade plus, and let me tell you, addressing the contradictions isn't going to help. It's not a contradiction of principles, it's a purely semantic debate, there is no resolution without one or both groups setting aside their expressed identity.
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
In other news JK Rowling just blocked Stephen King on Twitter. I hate Twitter, but I find that hilarious. She just can't see being called wrong. So much for having respect for your idol, JK.
In fairness she was trying to be nice and King instead decided to Dunk on her for something she'd previously said.

It would be like if Stephen King praised a director and they brought up the whole weird thing in It where the gang all have sex with the one girl while in the sewers so they can remember the way out.......... that's a thing that happens in the book........Luckily they've entirely ignored that in both adaptations
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,561
2,470
118
Country
United States
In fairness she was trying to be nice and King instead decided to Dunk on her for something she'd previously said.

It would be like if Stephen King praised a director and they brought up the whole weird thing in It where the gang all have sex with the one girl while in the sewers so they can remember the way out.......... that's a thing that happens in the book........Luckily they've entirely ignored that in both adaptations
The thing is, he wasn't even addressing J.K. Rowling. He didn't tweet his reply at her, the original post only mentioned her obliquely ("That TERF Tweet" could mean quite a few things, although it is incredibly likely that it was referring to Rowling), he didn't mention Rowling in his reply. All he did was say that trans-women are, in fact, women.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,433
5,691
118
Australia
They dumped it on Disney+. The reviews have been dismal. My guess is that whoever green-lit the movie was hoping for a Potter-like franchise and will blame any poor performance on COVID-19 rather than decisions that were almost certainly made at the producer level.
Considering the books are about a teenage sociopath and complete arse-nugget it isn’t a wonder they got changed. I mean I question the wisdom of buying them for adaptation to begin with if the main character is so objectionable you feel the need to make such drastic changes but if they were gonna run with it then they needed someone with charisma in the role. They didn’t get someone with charisma.
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
The thing is, he wasn't even addressing J.K. Rowling. He didn't tweet his reply at her, the original post only mentioned her obliquely ("That TERF Tweet" could mean quite a few things, although it is incredibly likely that it was referring to Rowling), he didn't mention Rowling in his reply. All he did was say that trans-women are, in fact, women.
This was just after he retweeted J.K. Rowlings tweet and then some-one replied to him calling for him to address the "Terf Tweet"

Retweeted by Stephen King


Tweet directed at him the same day

 
  • Like
Reactions: Specter Von Baren

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,923
1,791
118
Country
United Kingdom
Mmm. I'm really enjoying this now. Two big media figures being involved means this might just finally spark the war between transexual advocates and feminists.
That war is over.

It wasn't fought between media figures, it was fought between different groups of scientists, doctors and academic feminist theorists.

Trans-exclusionary feminism is a product of separatist feminism separatism in the 80s. Separatist feminism, even at the time, was a fringe position in feminist movements, generally characterised as weird, puritanical, reactionary and cult-like. It ultimately accomplished little save making a generation of lesbians (and 'political lesbians') extremely miserable. People like Sheila Jeffreys are a joke to any feminist activist under the age of 45, and are completely irrelevant in academia (and I say this as someone who has consistently argued that people like Sheila Jeffreys had genuine insights).

Someone like Rowling can only really exist in the UK, and only because the UK is kind of weird in that you have national journalists like Julie Bindell who still identify heavily with separatist feminism, and because at this present moment you have a huge national debate about trans rights. That debate isn't fuelled by feminism, it's fuelled by transphobia which, while occasionally dressed up as feminism or as concern for lesbians or women, has become increasingly visible for what it is as the debate has gone on. Feminism and trans rights are overwhelmingly on the same side, because you have to be a really bad feminist, or a really brainwashed idiot, to be willing to engage in coalitional activism with the religious right and literal neo-Nazis.

In order to have JK Rowling's views, you need to be someone who has absolutely no contact with the queer community or feminist activism beyond maybe reading the Guardian and hanging out with other middle class white people who also read the Guardian. Sadly, a lot of celebrities (in the UK at least) are those people.
 
Last edited:

lil devils x

🐐More Lego Goats Please!🐐
Legacy
May 1, 2020
3,330
1,045
118
Country
🐐USA🐐
Gender
♀
I see this entire issue as a social construct of the society itself due to societies pressure to have to be either a man or a woman in the first place in terms of their emotions and roles in society. Transwomen and transmen are not considered men or women in many other cultures that are transinclusive, they have their own gender and it is seen as no better or worse than being either male or female. Being a " woman" as it translates into our culture, and numerous cultures all over the world ONLY means = being born with a vagina. In our culture there are not just two genders, there is a spectrum of genders and people are not defined by their roles or how they dress. Those that fall in between male and female have their own genders, but we do not attempt to claim that a transwoman is in fact the exact same as a biological woman, because they are not and that would just cause confusion when trying to address issues that only affect those who were born with vaginas. We do not try to pretend they are the same as other men or women, because they are not, nor would we expect them to be. We do not interchange the words woman or man and transgendered, or " two spirit" in our culture. Even after a transwoman or transman undergoes gender reassignment surgery, they will not be the same as someone who was born with a vagina or a penis, they have their own unique set of risks, complications and issues that will only affect those who have gone through that procedure that do not affect those who were born with Vaginas and penises.

When people say the words "woman or girl" in general, it means someone who was born with a vagina, someone who was raised to be prepared that one day we could have a child grow in our wombs, that we have certain physical and emotional responsibilities that men simply will not have. It is not and should not be considered an all inclusive term to also include those who are female gendered as you have to combine both being female gendered and woman to= cisgendered woman, and that does not even apply to all women, as you have women who are also on all levels of the gender spectrumas well, that are not the same as a transwoman, or a transman for that matter. All of these different conditions already have their own terms, trying to use the same terms that already apply to something else to specifically talk about those who are born with vaginas only causes confusion. Wanting to be able to determine between the two is not " transphobic" , it is necessary to be able to discuss the needs of half the world's population here that do not apply to those who have penises. Men cannot have menstrual bleeding without a uteran lining, as that is what is actually being shed when a woman is on her period. While a transwoman may feel emotionally female, they do not generally have to be taught from the time they are born to wipe from front to back their entire life, or always have in the back of their mind that that have to make sure " nothing gets in there" 100% of the time or worry about wearing certain types of clothing can cause infections or have to worry about things like endometriosis, menorrhagia, or the many still undiagnosed conditions that ONLY affect women because of the generations of discrimination that have excluded women from medical trials so they still have no clue how common medications and chemicals affect women and still have not even diagnosed many common medical conditions that women endure because not enough research has been done due to women being excluded.

ALSO I think this whole " feminists vs transwomen" issue is a non issue and stupid. You can support Transwomen being transwomen and support helping them with their issues and ALSO support non trans women needing to have their issues addressed independently, as they are actually very different and separate issues. Supporting both should not take away from either. A cisgendered woman is never going to fully know the experience of what a transwoman goes through and a transwoman is never going to fully understand the experience of what a cisgendered woman goes through and most cis gendered and transgendered women understand that. From what I see, it is generally cisgendered men who seem to think that transwomen and women should be considered the same because they have never had to experience either of our issues and do not understand that those issues are in fact different, but equally deserving of support. It is a bit absurd and ignorant for onlookers to want to lump trans and cis gendered into the same category and pretend they are exactly the same when it is blatantly apparent they are not.

I have no idea why western culture seems to think that people have to be one or the other at all, this force to " choose" imposed upon them or why it is somehow negative to have your own gender. When you talk to two spirits ( transgendered) in Hopi culture, they just look on in amazement on how screwed up western culture is in regards to them. They were never made to feel that had to be either male or female. They do not feel the need to change their bodies because they have always been accepted and treated as though they are perfect the way they are and not made to feel bad or lacking in any way. I had linked the numerous videos on the old forums Native Americans talking about how they were always accepted in their own culture, but then compared to their nightmare experience from western culture.(I will have to look for the videos again later when I have time.) The point being, the entire argument about " transwomen being women" is stupid. They are transwomen, and that is wonderful and beautiful in itself. They are not and do not need to be the same as a woman who was born with a vagina, as neither are " less than" or better than" the other and the entire idea they are is stupid to begin with. Those who are born with a vagina are not less than or better than those who are not. They are not the same thing, but neither one is somehow better or inferior. Understanding and expressing they are different is in no way transphobic either, it is necessary in order to be able to address the issues impacting both adequately. I see much of this " lumping them into the same group as a result of these issues being viewed only through the lens of a cisgendered man in that " they both look like women, dress like women, act like women so they have to be all be women" and that is a terrible way for anyone to be viewed in the first place. Any negative stigma associated with being transgendered or cisgendered should not exist in the first place and I see that existing in western culture as the only reason anyone is having this conversation at all at the moment in the first place.
 
Last edited: