It has this de-literacy field where you can feel the neurons that allow you to read slowly wither away and die.This thread gives me a fucking headache.
Last edited:
It has this de-literacy field where you can feel the neurons that allow you to read slowly wither away and die.This thread gives me a fucking headache.
You put both those headlines in quotation marks. I just Googled both of them. The first comes up once from Rolling Stone magazine - hardly heavyweight media - as part of a headline, the second part being what the article is actually about (what ingesting bleach would do to you). The second scores zero hits as a headline. I think this illustrates, perhaps, why we shouldn't be so hasty to leap to condemnation, because if we all took a step back we'd recognise we too can be sloppy, inaccurate, or careless.People are playing a dangerous, dishonest game of telephone with these statements, and the media is complicit in it with misleading, exaggerated headlines like "Trump Promotes Injecting Bleach" and statements like "President Donald Trump had suggested on Thursday that people should consider ingesting or injecting bleach"
And?The first comes up once from Rolling Stone magazine - hardly heavyweight media
I didn't say it was a headline. I said "...and statements like...", and then I proceed to quote a statement I found in an article.The second scores zero hits as a headline.
And making fun of the President is not an adequate excuse for abusing the press.Nor are the occasional abuses of the press an adequate excuse for the origin and biggest element of the problem, which is the incompetence of the president in getting his facts right, maintaining a sober and responsible tone, and expressing himself clearly.
Because Agema says that all the time already, and he'd rather you or I say it instead. He's saying the wrong thing on purpose as bait someone to say the correct thing in contradiction, which is still pretty bad and therefore a weak defense for Agema to dunk on later. Is rhetorical cheese, that's all.Then why say he told people to inject bleach into themselves as a quote, instead of just saying he's an idiot that knows nothing of medicine?
This is why voting third-party (or writing-in, or spoiling the ballot) is hugely preferable to simply abstaining. It at least registers engagement, whereas abstention just sends the message that you probably couldn't be bothered.See, the thing is, it is.
If someone votes third-party in the US election, it means they're so dissatisfied by their pickings, and yet are serious enough about their civic duty, that they'll throw their vote away. All votes are messages of what the people want, and in that, people are making their voice heard. The proper response is not to sneer at them, but to address their concerns. Yet precious little of that has been happening in this election cycle, to my observation. It's mainly ostracizing, gaslighting, guilt tripping, pleading, and screaming. It's like people have no idea how to build bridges with others at all, which makes me fear for their personal relationships off the internet. I have made the decision to switch my vote from protest to Biden based on my own thoughts, despite the wailing and haranguing of portions of the left which actively repel me from them.
Having him eaten alive by emus, that would be a suitably absurd method of execution for this dingleberry.Ok he isn’t dead but this is good.
I don't know about the eyeball but I clearly saw Trump say in his own words about injecting bleach into the lungs.If you want to claim that Trump was spouting incoherent, stream of conscious nonsense, fine.
But claiming that the he suggested that the American people should poison themselves is orders of magnitude more severe. Lil devils, for example, was even CONVINCED that Trump explicitly said to inject bleach right into the eyeball, based on this same video. Someone else came to his defense and accused me of "gaslighting" when I disagreed.
People are playing a dangerous, dishonest game of telephone with these statements, and the media is complicit in it with misleading, exaggerated headlines like "Trump Promotes Injecting Bleach" and statements like "President Donald Trump had suggested on Thursday that people should consider ingesting or injecting bleach"
And all you have to do is tweak one or two words here and there, and we've gone from a hypothetical question, asked to medical experts, to an official endorsement from the POTUS that could get someone killed.
Key point: ...that could get someone killed.
You've heard of people who have actually injected or drank bleach, haven't you? Where do you think they got the idea from? How do you think lil devils arrived at her conclusion that Trump said anything about eyeballs? Can the blame be placed solely on Trump, or was it the media who, in a mad dash to denigrate their political or ideological opponents, or in an attempt to get more clicks and advertising revenue, made something sound worse than it really was?
It's in everyone's best interest to NOT spread misinformation that could get someone killed. If a "Trump-lover" overhears you saying "...yeah he wants us to inject bleach right into the eye! How silly!", he might actually go and do it. You don't want this to happen, do you? It might be tempting, but I believe that you're a good person who wouldn't wish this on his worst enemy.
Seriously, @lil devils x where did the "inject it into the eye" thing come from? Who told you that?
But anyway, sorry to interrupt. I just think that language is important. I'll go away now.
I don't really care too much about how exact the numbers are because it really doesn't help anything at this point. I just know from the NYC analysis from a couple months back (I think) where the they doubled the deaths at that time due to excess deaths. Maybe the US is doing slightly worse or slightly better than the numbers show but it ain't going to change the fact that we're doing bad.Just gonna shoot some stuff out quick because I spent too long playing with numbers and I have to get ready for work now, but I found the New York Times excess mortality data here. I only goes up to mid-May, but it's the easiest data set to work with that I've found so far. I then compared to the reported number of covid deaths from here. Between the week of March 9th when covid deaths in the US started and the week of May 11th where the dataset ends, there were 93,385 reported covid deaths in the US compared to excess mortality of 94,532. If we assume other than covid the normal number of people died (which is a bad assumption, but makes easy math), that makes the US death count just shy of 99% accurate.
But more interestingly, of that two month span, it looks like it flipped from undercounting to overcounting. For the first half, the reported covid deaths are thousands under the excess mortality, and then the second half is thousands over, flipping at the point where deaths started going down which suggests its actually just reporting lag. Buuuut the number of people dying to covid continued to go down after that period, so chances are almost 100% that the next few periods at least continued with more reported covid deaths than excess mortality...
The US is reporting more covid deaths than excess mortality, and the data set stopped being maintained exactly the week the numbers were going to trade places. I'll probably dive back into this stuff when I get home in like 12 hours.
Easy answer on this one: Donald Trump.You've heard of people who have actually injected or drank bleach, haven't you? Where do you think they got the idea from? How do you think lil devils arrived at her conclusion that Trump said anything about eyeballs? Can the blame be placed solely on Trump, or was it the media who, in a mad dash to denigrate their political or ideological opponents, or in an attempt to get more clicks and advertising revenue, made something sound worse than it really was?
Haha! Exactly. See how easy it is?I didn't say it was a headline. I said "...and statements like...", and then I proceed to quote a statement I found in an article.
Ironic that, in a discussion about misreading and misinterpreting, you failed to read a crucial word that changed the meaning of the sentence and caused you to come to an incorrect conclusion. You're right. We shouldn't be so hasty to leap to condemnation. We should take our time and read carefully, shouldn't we? We wouldn't want to be sloppy, inaccurate, or careless now would we?
So, what's not true about saying Trump proposed injecting bleach?Because Agema says that all the time already, and he'd rather you or I say it instead. He's saying the wrong thing on purpose as bait someone to say the correct thing in contradiction, which is still pretty bad and therefore a weak defense for Agema to dunk on later. Is rhetorical cheese, that's all.
Ok, but if you look at the numbers from that period, it seems reasonably obvious that the difference is because deaths with covid were reported later than deaths in general. Which makes sense, NYC was overwhelmed and had a testing backlog a couple weeks long, they probably weren't prioritizing testing dead people, once they caught up the disparity disappeared.I don't really care too much about how exact the numbers are because it really doesn't help anything at this point. I just know from the NYC analysis from a couple months back (I think) where the they doubled the deaths at that time due to excess deaths. Maybe the US is doing slightly worse or slightly better than the numbers show but it ain't going to change the fact that we're doing bad.
I'm really sorry that you're obsessed with Donald Trump. You know my political support isn't tied to the man, we've been over this a thousand times. You obsessively bring him up over and over again, and then you project that onto me when I call out the parts that are lies. You've got a problem.I'm really sorry that you tied your political support to such a moron.
Any politician more along the sociopathic/narcisstic end of the spectrum.That idiot Jared Kushner is the problem. What sort of imbecile thinks of a public health crisis as a PR problem.
So you're not going to vote for him, then? You told us in the past you were hitching your cart to his horse.I'm really sorry that you're obsessed with Donald Trump. You know my political support isn't tied to the man, we've been over this a thousand times.
I enjoy ripping on Trump. It's fun and...You obsessively bring him up over and over again and then you project that onto me when I call out the parts that are lies.
I believe my exact quote is "I didn't vote for Trump... but I probably will this time". That's hardly a declaration of loyalty. Like, while saying that, I was also actively talking about which Democrats I would consider if they won the nomination.So you're not going to vote for him, then? You told us in the past you were hitching your cart to his horse.
Trump didn't propose injecting bleach. There is no source for that claim because it didn't happen. You're being utterly ridiculous. You are lying, no argument needed.Your resistance to something as absurdly simple as clear as saying Trump proposed bleach injections tells anyone how deep a rabbit hole you've fallen. To give an example, you've spent about half a dozen posts just calling me a liar with no argument, and even despite me fulfilling your demand for a source.
Fair enough, I'll take your word for it.I believe my exact quote is "I didn't vote for Trump... but I probably will this time". That's hardly a declaration of loyalty. Like, while saying that, I was also actively talking about which Democrats I would consider if they won the nomination.
So is it then your contention that Trump didn't make any proposal about injecting bleach because he lied to the public about proposing to his advisors that they should check out injecting bleach? I suppose, in the emptiest of technicalities, that would make you correct.Trump didn't propose injecting bleach. There is no source for that claim because it didn't happen. You're being utterly ridiculous. You are lying, no argument needed.
Out of interest, which Democratic candidates would you have considered voting for in the Presidential election if they'd won in the primaries?Like, while saying that, I was also actively talking about which Democrats I would consider if they won the nomination.
That statement came from here: https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/i...ls-about-injecting-and-ingesting-bleach-spikeHaha! Exactly. See how easy it is?
Although really I was doubly imprecise, because that quotation you supplied actually got zero hits on a Google search in any form, not just headlines. So this media article you claim, as far as I can tell, either doesn't exist or is was so trivial and irrelevant as to not be worth making a noise over. We can all be part of the family of making silly errors together.