Sounds like trump is planning on nominating someone named Amy Coney Barrett to the supreme court.

Agema

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,212
6,484
118
Shadyside said:
Well she is saying she has integrity and will not be a pawn if the Republicans lose the election. Time will tell.
Click to expand...
I believe her: I'm sure she won't be a pawn.

She will entirely, of her own free will, back an agenda friendly to the Republicans on key issues. That's why they picked her. Why coerce anyone when you can just give the job to a volunteer who wants to help?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tireseas, TheMysteriousGX and Kae
D

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
749
389
68
Country
Denmark
Iron said:
The salt-mines will have an extra-shift today.
Click to expand...
Seems a fairly disgusting comment on what is a clearly partisan nomination to the highest judicial position in the US.

You're dealing with a woman who has demonstrated a clear agenda in har ruling, and if the first thing that springs to mind is that someone will be mad about it, and that such anger is a thing to joke about or mock, you might well find yourself not just on the wrong side of history, but on the wrong side of right and wrong.
 
Houseman

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
dreng3 said:
you might well find yourself not just on the wrong side of history
Click to expand...
I've always found this phrase to be a bit weird. Just what is "the wrong side of history?" There is no wrong side, or right side, it's just history. It's just stuff that happened.
More accurately, I've always found this to be a weird "threat" where people saying it are implying "when I'm in control of the narrative, I'm going to slander your actions in the past and make you out to be a horrible person", given that history is written by the victors.

Is that what you mean?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Specter Von Baren
Gergar12

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
3,921
864
118
Country
United States
She is a catholic religious bigot. And a corporate Shill.
 
Specter Von Baren

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,856
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
Houseman said:
I've always found this phrase to be a bit weird. Just what is "the wrong side of history?" There is no wrong side, or right side, it's just history. It's just stuff that happened.
More accurately, I've always found this to be a weird "threat" where people saying it are implying "when I'm in control of the narrative, I'm going to slander your actions in the past and make you out to be a horrible person", given that history is written by the victors.

Is that what you mean?
Click to expand...
Come Comerade! You do not wish to be on wrong side of history with fascist pig dogs? Join glorious communism and bask in the glory of suffering for all! Kill yourself in the name of communism or we will do it for you!
 
CM156

CM156

Resident Reactionary
Legacy
May 6, 2020
1,133
1,213
118
Country
United States
Gender
White Male
Houseman said:
I've always found this phrase to be a bit weird. Just what is "the wrong side of history?" There is no wrong side, or right side, it's just history. It's just stuff that happened.
Click to expand...
I concur, there really isn't a "right" or "wrong" side of history. People invoke that trope when they want to guilt someone.

Revnak said:
Well, it appears the Dems had zero interest in stopping her after all.
Click to expand...
And just what do you expect them to do?
 
Trunkage

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,042
3,035
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Specter Von Baren said:
Come Comerade! You do not wish to be on wrong side of history with fascist pig dogs? Join glorious communism and bask in the glory of suffering for all! Kill yourself in the name of communism or we will do it for you!
Click to expand...
You don’t have to be communist to want to be against fascism


CM156 said:
I concur, there really isn't a "right" or "wrong" side of history. People invoke that trope when they want to guilt someone.
Click to expand...
Sort of...

Like, being pro-slavery is pretty wrong
 
Asita

Asita

Answer Hazy, Ask Again Later
Legacy
Jun 15, 2011
3,226
1,079
118
Country
USA
Gender
Male
Revnak said:
Precisely nothing
Click to expand...
Allow me to rephrase the question: How, praytell, is it the Democrats fault that the Republican party used their majority to overrule and ignore their objections, end the debate, force the vote, and then push her through, all along party lines?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tireseas
CM156

CM156

Resident Reactionary
Legacy
May 6, 2020
1,133
1,213
118
Country
United States
Gender
White Male
Revnak said:
Precisely nothing
Click to expand...
Okay, let me rephrase that: what do you think the democrats could have done to stop ACB?

Trunkage said:
Sort of...

Like, being pro-slavery is pretty wrong
Click to expand...
Yes, currently being pro-slavery is bad. But I don't know how things are going to shake out in the next 1000+ years or what historians of the future will think.

Trunkage said:
So you voted last time partially based on the Supreme Court. Are you happy with the results?
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Specter Von Baren
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom