Election results discussion thread (and sadly the inevitable aftermath)
- Thread starter Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)
- Start date
- Status
They didn't. But the argument was about people not the political teams lol
I mean people really did lose their shit
Oh I am, I'm the one making it lol
Fucking knew it we gone from "No-one was" to "They're not important enough to count".
Them goals do keep moving on their own mysteriously lol
So Stinky rebellion but with more anger bats and less super glue?
lol
You're the one trying to say I should care about your paranoid ramblings. You started out putting words in other people's moths, before putting words in my mouth, and you still haven't even found anybody since even these nobodies were apparently being sarcastic.
You are still 0 for [indeterminate amount that implies commonality]
Please make a real point instead of wasting everyone's time.
a) He did not lie to them about the conversation taking place. He was forward that the conversation took place. He "lied" about whether a particular topic came up, the FBI had a recording that it came up briefly but was left at "we'll pick this up after the inauguration", and when he said they hadn't discussed that, the interviewers noted they believed he was being honest about his recollection of the conversation.
b) It still doesn't matter. By the logic of that investigation, we should be investigating anyone on incoming team Biden to make sure they don't talk to diplomats until they take office.
None of the others mentioned "marking supporters".
I genuinely have no idea what relevance this has to the section you quoted. It reads as a complete non-sequitur.
if your takeaway from the Jussie Smollett incident was that Nazis and white supremacists can't be dangerous, then I don't know what to tell you.
Still not getting the point I see..............
Literal lists were being made at one point but now the site is down it doesn't matter / didn't exist ever?
You're claiming Trump is trying for a coup and putting words in his mouth are you not?
There is no point except the paranoid ramblings.
There are no lists, you haven't shown a single one. You had 2 people not doing what you said they were doing and 1 person doing the literal opposite of what you said they were doing, but I should be worried about that instead of...
The literal coup that was attempted and the ongoing attempt to silence voters, a very real, proven, and immediate threat.
You're divorced from reality.
Pretty sure it's implied by them mentioning conservatives or "Them all"
Anti-semitism issues
I'm saying there's been a LOT of fake stuff going on and fear drummed up due to the fake stuff and people often not learning the truth.
Off the top of my head here's some of the fakes or cases where things were far more innocent.
Trump supporter pulls off girls headscarf
KKK coming to University Campus
Church burned down by alleged Trump supporters
Car vandalised by Trump supporters
Car set on fire by Trump supporters
Jussie Smollett
Car vandalised as set on fire by Trump supporters
Nooses on Campus
Poop Swastika
Nascar Noose
Racist threats send to student
As always, you've picked the most absurdly charitable chain of events possible. He pled guilty to knowingly and willingly lying, and then withdrew it two years later, conveniently just before sentencing. In the face of that, what does it matter what interviewers reckoned at the time?
But, of course, you've chosen to put faith in what the interviewers reckoned, and in the request to withdraw-- and to ignore altogether the guilty plea he made under oath and stuck with for 2 years. To ignore that even Trump said he lied to the FBI.
If there's grounds for it. The Flynn investigation was sparked by the discovery he had made untrue statements to Pence and others. If something like that cropped up, yeah, it should be investigated.
Rules for thee but not for me on your "side" it seems
Oh because the lists no longer exist as the website got taken down doesn't mean they exist anymore?
how about twitter bot that named all Trump donors again?
Who's donating to Trump's campaign? This bot will tell you.
Adam Kraft created the bot 'Every Trump Donor' using public campaign finance data. It tweets the contribution amount along with the donors' name, location and profession.
money.cnn.com
No a coup if he doesn't use the words. Them's the rules I mean no-one is specifically saying list of Trump supporters so we can go after them right?
I do abide by equal rules for all. If you can find anything post it by all means.
Ah yes, those dastardly web users looking up public information, how dare. And the makers are saying to blacklist everyone on the list? They aren't? You're still paranoid? Whoulda guessed?Oh because the lists no longer exist as the website got taken down doesn't mean they exist anymore?
how about twitter bot that named all Trump donors again?
Who's donating to Trump's campaign? This bot will tell you.
Adam Kraft created the bot 'Every Trump Donor' using public campaign finance data. It tweets the contribution amount along with the donors' name, location and profession.money.cnn.com
I don't know what rules you think you're operating on, but you clearly have out of whack priorities. Or you're here thinking the only thing that matters is rhetoric. You're trying to convince me that Trump supporters will be blacklisted, having shown literally 0 proof of it. Meanwhile Trump is actually bad and doing a bad and did a bad, but you think it's rhetorically identical despite it being massively different.
There's no mention of "marking" anyone, except in the sarcastic tweet. Do we really need to go through this back-and-forth over every tiny point?
Right, so... what does this have to do with a bunch of white supremacists in an online forum, or randomers on Twitter? I genuinely don't know where you're going with this, or what it has to do with anything.
OK. And your takeaway from these incidents is that white supremacists or neo-Nazis don't pose a real physical threat?
Last edited:
Yeah! Just like how mobsters use words like "rub out" and "remove", and since they're not actually saying the word "murder", they can't ever be convicted!
You're still imagining an impossible series of events. The discovery of untrue statements cannot spark the investigation that "discovered" them. That just isn't how cause and effect works.
Unknown, but signs overall point to "yes," though how smoothly he goes out to door remains to be seen.
The GSA finally called Biden the apparent winner and, while top Republicans are keeping their mouths shut on the result of the election, it's kind of clear to everybody that Biden had a fairly clear, if also close, win in more than enough states to get a majority of electors to win (itself ignoring a decisive popular vote majority).
It's pretty hard to see what Trump could do to stay in power at this point. States are and or have certified their votes and very few, if any, of the "Fraud" legal suits seem to have any merit or chance of convincing anyone but the Trumpkins.
There's the hypothetical of GOP legislators deciding to ignore their own certified votes and state laws and just send Trump electors to the EC but that seems like a pretty long shot at this point and would immediately turn into a massive shitshow at best, with every single person involved having their life and history under a national microscope.
At worst it triggers riots, lynching and civil war.
Last edited:
- Status