You think you come across as this level and indifferent? You're feuding on every thread dude.I found this funny:
I'm not sure what's funny about it.I found this funny:
I'm quite happy saying that it's a really unwise interjection after pages and pages detailing increasingly futile, desperate and pathetic conservative attempts to prove election fraud.I mean, you could consider what post that line was actually in response to rather than apply it to the entire thread topic. The person that was aimed at was claiming knowledge of decades of Republican voter disenfranchisement, which means you're sort of just agreeing with me.
OK, I've been watching this for about 20 minutes out of morbid interest.
Because I found a comic funny?You think you come across as this level and indifferent? You're feuding on every thread dude.
To me, the joke seems to be the juxtaposition between "now is the time for unity" and how the same people are using terms like "hopium" and "copium", to further make fun of those who lost. You can't do both. If you want unity, stop kicking people while they're down. That's the joke.I'm not sure what's funny about it.
When handling sensitive data, I would think that the important thing is that the data does not leave the room. If you're writing down names so that you can hand the list to a supervisor, or something, that's fine. If you're going to put the list in your pocket and go home with it, that's not fine.He complains about how he was prevented from doing so. Uhrm, yeah, because that sounds like a colossal data protection infringement. No way should he have been allowed, they were right to stop him.
We have so many witnesses all claiming the same thing, that they were intimidated, harassed, and thrown out, that it seems unlikely that it wasn't systemic and intentional.But how many of these complaints are just miscommunications/ errors on the poll-watchers' parts, which have been blown out of proportion because these people have been repeatedly told there was fraud?
2.5 seconds.How long does it take to commit election, changing thousands of votes?
Also, wasn't it really good of him to do it on public so everyone can see? It's almost like he wanted to get caught. I usually do my crimes out of sight of people
It's an absurdity, because no-one really believes unity is coming. The Republicans have exercised mass obstructionism for over twenty years: they could not have made it clearer that it's their way or no way. And it's not like they've offered any hints of a change of course. In fact, the Republican Senators have already implicitly said they're intent on Biden only getting the cabinet they're prepared to let him have. "Unity" is just the cliched bromide to sell to the few moderates who delude themselves their politics isn't doomed to be another four years of partisan shitshow.To me, the joke seems to be the juxtaposition between "now is the time for unity" and how the same people are using terms like "hopium" and "copium", to further make fun of those who lost. You can't do both. If you want unity, stop kicking people while they're down. That's the joke.
Speaking as someone who deals with more data protection stuff than I'd like... If you want to handle that sort of information, you make sure you're appropriately trained and aware of the laws, that you are operating under approved ethical permission, with proper safety procedures, and so on. Otherwise you are a massive clusterfuck waiting to happen, and a wise supervisor who does know about these things (and will take a ton of flak too if there's a problem) tells you to cut that shit out, pronto.When handling sensitive data, I would think that the important thing is that the data does not leave the room. If you're writing down names so that you can hand the list to a supervisor, or something, that's fine. If you're going to put the list in your pocket and go home with it, that's not fine.
Yes it is. The comic is meant to be absurd. This is from the same artist who had Joe Biden sucking out a black woman's melanin through his hand, because if she doesn't vote for him "you ain't black".It's an absurdity,
Okay, that has nothing to do with the comic, though.The Republicans have exercised mass obstructionism for over twenty years: they could not have made it clearer that it's their way or no way. And it's not like they've offered any hints of a change of course. In fact, the Republican Senators have already implicitly said they're intent on Biden only getting the cabinet they're prepared to let him have. "Unity" is just the cliched bromide to sell to the few moderates who delude themselves their politics isn't doomed to be another four years of partisan shitshow.
Again, sadly, I had to open up the ignore message to see what you were talking about.It's an absurdity, because no-one really believes unity is coming. The Republicans have exercised mass obstructionism for over twenty years: they could not have made it clearer that it's their way or no way. And it's not like they've offered any hints of a change of course. In fact, the Republican Senators have already implicitly said they're intent on Biden only getting the cabinet they're prepared to let him have. "Unity" is just the cliched bromide to sell to the few moderates who delude themselves their politics isn't doomed to be another four years of partisan shitshow.
I do handle sensitive data. In a setting like this, where there's a strong potential for members of the public/ other organisations to enter and leave, duplicating the data on uncontrolled personal notes is not something you do.When handling sensitive data, I would think that the important thing is that the data does not leave the room. If you're writing down names so that you can hand the list to a supervisor, or something, that's fine. If you're going to put the list in your pocket and go home with it, that's not fine.
But stuff like that should have been covered in their training, not some sort of ad hoc decision made by someone who thinks that this shouldn't be allowed.
Maybe it was explicitly disallowed in his training, maybe it wasn't, I dunno. Voter registration information is also public information.
Prior to the election, their favoured candidate told them to expect it. And people see what they expect to see. We have dozens of witness reports of weird lights and aliens and stuff from places of reported alien encounters as well, because the expectation is there: so instead of a headlight in the distance, people report UFO lights. And instead of a perfectly normal thing like some guy plugging a USB into a computer, people see fraud.We have so many witnesses all claiming the same thing, that they were intimidated, harassed, and thrown out, that it seems unlikely that it wasn't systemic and intentional.
And on the contrary, people have been told to expect "the most safest and most secure election ever!" by the media, and so I can understand that there's a lot of resistance to the idea that the election wasn't as safe and secure as they were led to believe.Prior to the election, their favoured candidate told them to expect it. And people see what they expect to see. We have dozens of witness reports of weird lights and aliens and stuff from places of reported alien encounters as well, because the expectation is there: so instead of a headlight in the distance, people report UFO lights. And instead of a perfectly normal thing like some guy plugging a USB into a computer, people see fraud.
Noone wants unity with fascist fetishists. They can fuck right off and die in a ditch.Because I found a comic funny?
To me, the joke seems to be the juxtaposition between "now is the time for unity" and how the same people are using terms like "hopium" and "copium", to further make fun of those who lost. You can't do both. If you want unity, stop kicking people while they're down. That's the joke.
Oh man of the past, for whom religious is a political party, fear not! We here in the future have realized that faith in a particular God is not an indication of your political party, save of course worshipping Donald Trump as his Cult does.From the hearing:
Witnesses allege "black lives matter" shirts and face-masks are allowed, but a "Trust Jesus" shirt was not allowed for "dress code violations".
Systemic and intentional discrimination targeted at republicans?