Neat, so what was the point of your bullshit tweet? Why should I care?
Neat, so what was the point of your bullshit tweet? Why should I care?
It's okay, you don't have to care about the safety and security of the electionNeat, so what was the point of your bullshit tweet? Why should I care?
No seriously, I don't get it. The premise here is the voting machines were faulty, haunted by Ghost in the Shell Hugo Chavez, but the results from the machines were posted to the state at the end of the election and hand counting the votes gives the same result within .007% of that total, so Motoko Chavez didn't seem to do much here. I'd like to know, what's the point of that tweet?It's okay, you don't have to care about the safety and security of the election
Two possibilities:hand counting the votes gives the same result within .007% of that total
No seriously, I don't get it. The premise here is the voting machines were faulty, haunted by Ghost in the Shell Hugo Chavez, but the results from the machines were posted to the state at the end of the election and hand counting the votes gives the same result within .007% of that total, so Motoko Chavez didn't seem to do much here. I'd like to know, what's the point of that tweet?
lol, so what about the possibility that the district that Trump won did in fact win, even on the Dominion system, and it accurately reflected the votes of the people? Like, it's not like Trump lost this county, the official result is he won it, and the hand recount didn't dispute that.Two possibilities:
1) The forensic report is fraudulent
2) The counted votes were fraudulent and were printed/shredded as needed to match the tabulator totals.
Yes, they had to "fix" their error so that they wouldn't be caught red-handed before the recount. That's option 3lol, so what about the possibility that the district that Trump won did in fact win, even on the Dominion system, and it accurately reflected the votes of the people? Like, it's not like Trump lost this county, the official result is he won it, and the hand recount didn't dispute that.
>Before the recountYes, they had to "fix" their error so that they wouldn't be caught red-handed before the recount. That's option 3
Partisanship. It also works both ways.Just gotta ask.
Why is the standard of evidence so much for Lefties to jump over but Conservatives listens to one 'insider' (without any evidence) and they completely believe them?
Eg. This last exchange between Crimson and Houseman
Republicans can't commit voter fraud because they're the ones who are supposed to win in the first place. The only way Democrats ever win is by cheating, so when Republicans "cheat" really they're just playing by the Democrat rules. Remember its not really a Democracy because only one side is supposed to win and if they don't its not a real election.BUSTED? Why the numbers behind Mitch McConnell's re-election don't add up
On a Thursday in August in Louisville, months before the 2020 election, a parade of cars filled with Kentucky Teamster representatives and labor groups, showed their fury at Mitch McConnell's constant blocking of critical COVID aid. They drove by McConnell's office raucously honking and...www.rawstory.com
Interesting if true. And would definitely be the most hilarious outcome, if the ones committing voter fraud turned out to be the Republicans.
That being said, McGrath promised to be worse than McConnell, I'm not actually surprised she lost hard.
Any time the Republicans talk about defending democracy, they should be reminded of the time they desperately tried for months on end to get the votes of eligible, legal voters tossed out.
That's obviously fake news cuz it's not a tweet, you could at least try...BUSTED? Why the numbers behind Mitch McConnell's re-election don't add up
On a Thursday in August in Louisville, months before the 2020 election, a parade of cars filled with Kentucky Teamster representatives and labor groups, showed their fury at Mitch McConnell's constant blocking of critical COVID aid. They drove by McConnell's office raucously honking and...www.rawstory.com
Interesting if true. And would definitely be the most hilarious outcome, if the ones committing voter fraud turned out to be the Republicans.
That being said, McGrath promised to be worse than McConnell, I'm not actually surprised she lost hard.
"Anytime the democrats cry about voter suppression, they should be reminded of the time they disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of people through fraud."Any time the Republicans talk about defending democracy, they should be reminded of the time they desperately tried for months on end to get the votes of eligible, legal voters tossed out.
Republicans can't commit voter fraud because they're the ones who are supposed to win in the first place. The only way Democrats ever win is by cheating, so when Republicans "cheat" really they're just playing by the Democrat rules. Remember its not really a Democracy because only one side is supposed to win and if they don't its not a real election.
Trump: "I know you cheated! We used rigged machines to jack up the vote, so the only way you could have won is if you did it too!"That's obviously fake news cuz it's not a tweet, you could at least try...
The difference being that yours is just sheer allegation, whereas the Republicans are self-confessedly trying to get hundreds of thousands of votes discounted. Its explicitly what they've demanded."Anytime the democrats cry about voter suppression, they should be reminded of the time they disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of people through fraud."
See, I can do it too.
Throwing out votes because of fraud is bad?The difference being that yours is just sheer allegation, whereas the Republicans are self-confessedly trying to get hundreds of thousands of votes discounted. Its explicitly what they've demanded.