Sort of. My general view is that the director has the ultimate creative responsibility, and the film is theirs. I know this is not always true in practice - some directors are thoroughly under the thumb of producers or even an actor. Given Anderson's grip on the series, there's every reason to think he may well have been exerting considerable creative control over the nominal director for those movies.So 2 & 3 are still his movies, he just was not in the director's chair this time. I use to have the first two, but sold them after realizing how boring they were.