Recent content by Jegsimmons

yes, because blue hair is really hard to find in anime.

the redundant irony in this post is amazing. also, may i point out that Del Toro HIMSELF SAID HE HAS NEVER SEEN EVANGELION!!!

4chan may have racism and foulness about it, but it has complete freespeech and a major variation in different views and the advantage of anonymity. Quiet frankly i go there more than i come here for any discussions.

Are you implying Eva is the only reason Pacific Rim exist as opposed to every other Mech and Monster movie/anime out there? I refuse to believe Eva is that damn influential.

besides the fact GTA is multiplatform, all i take from this is: WAAAAH WAAAHHH MY GAME WONT SELL AS GOOD WAAAH WAAAHHH!!!! WHERES MY BOTTLE!?

I wish people would stop making comparisons with Eva...this is a GOOD film, not 17 hours and some change of annoying people i hope the monsters kill.

Lone ranger is a bomb Man of steel has peaked No one is watching this is the end or heat Monsters has peaked WWZ has peaked Pacific Rim has little to no competition in terms of summer blockbusters And Dredd suffered from having a bad movie related to it (the 95 version) and star ship...

Its the only movie out right now and its only competition is grown ups 2 and is getting universal praise....box office flop my ass.

He was a racist? uhm, maby because that was the social norm. you're asking about the ethic of people 250 years ago? what the hell is the point of this thread?

Mel Gibson!? HOT DIGGITY DAFFODIL!!! I love that guy! Steven Seagal? as what? a background farm pig?

Its made by the same people who made the shitty and boring uncharted series and is PS3 only.

I know right? there's no sport in it! I mean, shit, people crowd up and run for the same exit so i'll i have to do is keep stabbing or shooting and even when one on one unarmed it only take 75 pounds of force to collapse a throat or even pocket sand. Do people not understand the importance of...

"Scientifically speaking unless you can prove there is a god, there isn't one." No, scientifically speaking, if their is no evidence either way, it inconclusive. How ever, when speaking of a metaphysical being, physical evidence is out of the question anyway. So in a sense, yes and no...

"hey mister Wes Craven (or who ever came up with him.) is Freddy a fictional character?" "yes" positive evidence. Sorry i just like being a smart ass.

You mean it shows no evidence either way. And that's not a question, that's a statement. You can't draw a scientifically accurate conclusion when no evidence for either one exist, especially when dealing with the metaphysical.