Feel free to reread the article. It says that rumors of his sexuality were spreading, his father set his cousins to spy on him, and explicitly threatened him with death were he to come out. That's quite a bit of evidence his family knew.
The word "exploit" is only actually used in the headline, with all references in the body of the article to such things done with insinuations. The author (and legal advocates) put together "the implication of quid pro quo", that they won't deport or imprison people who cooperate with intelligence, but the individual case they present is of someone who apparently had no intel to give but has still neither been imprisoned nor deported.
So it comes down to my definition of 'knew'. I was meaning that it was sure that they 'knew' and you saying knew is it that they are following rumors 'knew'. Okay. Like, that's a reason for me to believe they werent in Hamas. They would punish people based on rumors
Yeah, to me the quid pro quo was the problem/ exploit. This might be different if Gazans had another choice. There are quite a few countries who would do the same as Israel. But most people have alternative countries they could seek Asylum with. Also, threatening deportation if they dont comply.
Israel might be the most pro-LGBT country in the region. That's not saying much. That's like saying Stalin is better than Hitler. Yes, that's true but that does not make Stalin a good person. And considering Iran's stance on transgender people, I dont know if its true. Or maybe Israel is better with the gays and Iran is better with trans.
I totally recognise this is a one sided article. I dont understand why you would threaten someone over something you can generally safely assume to be fake. Maybe Mossad had more evidence he was part of Hamas and they will never tell us. Mossad has kept secret whether they have done nuclear testing for 50 years. They dont tell anyone anything. This is the price you pay for keeping secrets