I think that would be neat, but the whole point of a game like this is to play with people around you. I'm glad this game is coming along nicely; everyone seemed to mark this game off without even giving it a chance! I could not believe people marked it off before they even learned about what the game had to offer.Madmanonfire said:I really hope this game has online play.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HAVE ONLINE PLAY!
It definitely has online capabilities, not sure about online play itself. It might in order to help show off the Wii U's online, and it might not because it seems to be designed around a local play experience.Madmanonfire said:I really hope this game has online play.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HAVE ONLINE PLAY!
Well, there are plenty of exclusives we know of. Mario U, Smash 4, Project P-100, ZombiU, Pikmin 3, Rayman Legends. It's also getting some multiplats that aren't out yet like AC3, Aliens, and Runner2. Likely to be the definitive versions of such as well.Mcoffey said:They're probably worried that it'll be like Wii Sports, in that most people bought the Wii and then that's the only game they played. That's a lotta retail money they missed out on.
And while it may be fun, that's not enough justification for a 200+ money sink. I can have fun on my comp, my xbox or my phone. Show me something compelling, something that isn't a port from a game that came out on actual consoles over a year ago, and then you'll have my attention.
I will never go to Disneyland again should this exist.LilithSlave said:Hearing the words "Nintendo Land" also makes me think they need to create a theme park.
I think it would benefit from a little of both, not smaller games but larger games that serve an even larger game. Like if the minigames served an even bigger purpose in a larger competition like in Mario party.Squilookle said:A big problem I always had with Mario Party was that the games were too small/simple and numerous. I liked it better in, say, Conker's bad fur day where there were fewer, but meatier multiplayer games. This sounds like it might be the latter too.
Sure, there's no reason why they can't serve a larger 'overgame' like the mario party board. I just like my minigames to have just a teeny bit of depth to them, that's all.him over there said:I think it would benefit from a little of both, not smaller games but larger games that serve an even larger game. Like if the minigames served an even bigger purpose in a larger competition like in Mario party.Squilookle said:A big problem I always had with Mario Party was that the games were too small/simple and numerous. I liked it better in, say, Conker's bad fur day where there were fewer, but meatier multiplayer games. This sounds like it might be the latter too.