I was planning on buying Rust once it gets towards completion. I just have too many Early Access alpha games to keep up with right now, and unfortunately Rust didn't make it for me. I've been watching Markiplier play it, and it certainly does look like something I've be interested in, but things have happened and I don't have the cash for it right now.Kalezian said:AnthrSolidSnake said:Ironically, Rust is the one Early Access survival game I purposely skipped because I though it looked boring. I figured I didn't need another one seeing as I bought DayZ, Nether, and 7 Days to Die, however Rust seems to be the one everyone praises the most. Figures.
Not that I regret my purchases. I enjoy each of them in different ways. The only problem is that inevitably, every vocal part of the forum communities are absolutely drooling idiots and people crying when the game is too hard for them.
Rust is only hard in the sense that you literally only start with a rock, a medpack, and a torch. that's it.
Weapons, clothing, shelters, all of that is made from the resources you gather with your rock.
Now, if that didn't seem daunting, you also got wolves, bears, and the seldom zombie placeholder that will attack you.
Even then, if you do manage to build a half decent shelter, get a hatchet and maybe a pistol, and of course the ever elusive pants that people first make so they are not completely nude, then you have to worry about other players going the easy route and just taking what you worked to make.
Whereas DayZ you just have to be lucky and find a place that has either respawned items or hasn't been looted yet.
Both are good games, both show just how dickish people would be in a post apocalyptic scenario, but they are different enough that a fan of ether game would enjoy the other.
It isn't, the fun comes from the part where you haven't been bashed by a rock.AldUK said:HOW IS THAT FUN?
It's all the thrill of hardcore surviving without actually risking your life. I'm not sure how to explain it to someone who doesn't get it, because every time I have has been a lost cause, but really, it's just nice to play a game that's hard because of the other people. It's all the thrill of intense, online combat combined with survival elements. It's not really meant for those that can't stand losing to someone else.AldUK said:I have to be honest, I don't really 'get' this new genre of games sweeping the market. Everything I've seen of them just seems downright boring as hell. I'd rather play a structured, finished game with clear goals like State of Decay. You're a survivor, here's some zombies, here's some other survivors, here's a base, here's some missions. Have fun. As opposed to, you're a naked guy in a huge empty map and when you finally find another player, there's a good chance they will bash your head in to take your rock.
HOW IS THAT FUN?
'cause if you catch them unawares you can bash their heads in. Then nick their stuff and use it to build a house.AldUK said:I have to be honest, I don't really 'get' this new genre of games sweeping the market. Everything I've seen of them just seems downright boring as hell. I'd rather play a structured, finished game with clear goals like State of Decay. You're a survivor, here's some zombies, here's some other survivors, here's a base, here's some missions. Have fun. As opposed to, you're a naked guy in a huge empty map and when you finally find another player, there's a good chance they will bash your head in to take your rock.
HOW IS THAT FUN?