At least the History Channel... things they make... occasionally are used to fund non-pandering historical stuff every once in a while. Like the Bonnie-and-Clyde colab. Or any of their one-and-dones or the "let's humanize mythologized sections of the last 500 years".Steve the Pocket said:You know, for all people complained about reality TV ruining all television forever around ten years ago, at least those shows had real flair. Spectacle. They were like the high-concept, big-budget cousins of sleazy game shows. Nowadays all we get is Pop Idol-inspired competitions and contrived docu-dramas about people and situations barely interesting enough to deserve a "Hey, did you hear about this?" human interest story on a slow news day.
I've never understood that either. I know some people have gone on record saying that it was sexist, but I saw a couple dozen episodes scattered through the seasons and I never found it to be particularly so (i.e. It was a bit sexist, but no more so that ~75% of the movies and shows out there).Trucken said:I get that not everyone loves everything ever made. It's only natural, people like different things.
With that said, I just don't get the overwhelming hatred some people have against Entourage. I get if people don't like it (I thought season 1 was pretty boring), but I never see anyone say that they "just" don't like it. It seems that Entourage is either loved, liked, or truly f*cking hated. Heck, Bob himself just called it "the worst thing that ever happened to television". Why is that?
I don't see the problem with it. For all of us foreigners know, there very well might be another Toronto in Massachusetts. We're not all experts on North American geography.Thunderous Cacophony said:It's like hearing someone say "London, England" or "New York, USA"; it's unnecessary specification in average conversation, when everybody would know just from the name of the city which one you are talking about. (And even if there was the possibility of confusion, why not say "Toronto, Ontario", as some people say "Paris, Texas". Going right for the country seems like you go from potentially too narrow right to too broad.)
As a lifelong Canuck, I thinks it's because to many southern American's Canada is that weird place up north with snow 11 months of the year and that's about it. So it's assumed if you use Ontario instead of Canada that'll just confuse the issue more.Thunderous Cacophony said:I've never understood that either. I know some people have gone on record saying that it was sexist, but I saw a couple dozen episodes scattered through the seasons and I never found it to be particularly so (i.e. It was a bit sexist, but no more so that ~75% of the movies and shows out there).Trucken said:I get that not everyone loves everything ever made. It's only natural, people like different things.
With that said, I just don't get the overwhelming hatred some people have against Entourage. I get if people don't like it (I thought season 1 was pretty boring), but I never see anyone say that they "just" don't like it. It seems that Entourage is either loved, liked, or truly f*cking hated. Heck, Bob himself just called it "the worst thing that ever happened to television". Why is that?
On the topic of questions not related to the article, why do some people say, "Toronto, Canada"? Is there some other city named Toronto that people regularly refer to? It's like hearing someone say "London, England" or "New York, USA"; it's unnecessary specification in average conversation, when everybody would know just from the name of the city which one you are talking about. (And even if there was the possibility of confusion, why not say "Toronto, Ontario", as some people say "Paris, Texas". Going right for the country seems like you go from potentially too narrow right to too broad.)