Supervolcano Melts Roads into "Asphalt Soup" at Yellowstone National Park

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
Supervolcano Melts Roads into "Asphalt Soup" at Yellowstone National Park



The massive supervolcano beneath Yellowstone National Park is melting the asphalt roads in the area, leading to a partial closure of the park.

Tourists are being barred from certain areas of Yellowstone National Park due to roads melting under the volcanic activity. Specifically, the road between Old Faithful and Madison Junction is said to be "dangerously compromised," according to Yellowstone spokesman Dan Hottle.

"It basically turned the asphalt into soup," said Hottle. "It turned the gravel road into oatmeal."

Park officials warned tourists to avoid hiking in the affected areas or face a high probability of accidentally stepping into boiling hot water. Another park spokesman said the closure would only be temporary, but it is not known how long it will last. Three million people visit the park every year.

The supervolcano beneath Yellowstone hasn't erupted in 640,000 years, and in 2013, geologists discovered that it is two-and-a-half times larger than previously believed. The region experiences between 1000 and 2000 earthquakes a year due to volcanic activity.

According to the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, "Contrary to some media reports, Yellowstone is not 'overdue' for a supereruption."

Of course, that's just what they want us to think. Are you at all concerned about the Yellowstone supervolcano? Have you visited the national park? As someone who studied vulcanology in college, I'd love to, one day.

Source: Raw Story [http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/14/parts-of-yellowstone-national-park-closed-after-massive-supervolcano-beneath-it-melts-roads/]

Permalink
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
Asphalt Soup, now that's a name for a biker bar if I've ever heard one.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.

EDIT:

Rhykker said:
-Dragmire- said:
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.
Well... It's a supervolcano. I'm sure there are people who will exaggerate things, but it would certainly have worldwide impacts. A good chunk of the US would be buried in ash. The ash ejected into the atmosphere could easily take us into a nuclear winter, cooling temperatures by partially blocking out the Sun and certainly affecting global climate more than humans have.

While this doesn't mean the world will explode or that we're all doomed, apart from those directly affected by the ash burial (ie a good chunk of the US), the sudden climate change could lead to famine in parts of the world and have other widespread socioeconomic impacts.

Fortunately, the odds of Yellowstone erupting any time soon aren't particularly high.
InsanityRequiem said:
-Dragmire- said:
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.
To add to what Rhykker said, if the Yellowstone super volcano erupted, a good portion of Mid-West and Central US would be gone essentially from the ash. East US would not suffer as bad, but there would still be problems, particularly large scale food shortages because the East's main food source (Mid-West/Central US farming) would be wiped out. The West Coast (Oregon, CA, and Washington mostly, most likely a good chunk of the South West too) would not feel any major aftereffects until at least six months to a year after the eruption, as most of the ash will settle in the Atlantic/Europe/Asia areas.

The Southern Hemisphere will fare the best due to how the air streams conflict with those of the Northern Hemisphere. Africa, Australia, and South America will get a huge influx of refugees from the Northern Hemisphere. Air travel will be dead basically for a good two, three generations because of the ash clouds and whatever remains of North America will be completely restructured.
Thanks for the info!
 

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
Lilani said:
Asphalt Soup, now that's a name for a biker bar if I've ever heard one.
Batman eats a hearty breakfast of asphalt soup every morning, giving him that soothing, gravely voice.
 

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
-Dragmire- said:
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.
Well... It's a supervolcano. I'm sure there are people who will exaggerate things, but it would certainly have worldwide impacts. A good chunk of the US would be buried in ash. The ash ejected into the atmosphere could easily take us into a nuclear winter, cooling temperatures by partially blocking out the Sun and certainly affecting global climate more than humans have.

While this doesn't mean the world will explode or that we're all doomed, apart from those directly affected by the ash burial (ie a good chunk of the US), the sudden climate change could lead to famine in parts of the world and have other widespread socioeconomic impacts.

Fortunately, the odds of Yellowstone erupting any time soon aren't particularly high.
 

InsanityRequiem

New member
Nov 9, 2009
700
0
0
-Dragmire- said:
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.
To add to what Rhykker said, if the Yellowstone super volcano erupted, a good portion of Mid-West and Central US would be gone essentially from the ash. East US would not suffer as bad, but there would still be problems, particularly large scale food shortages because the East's main food source (Mid-West/Central US farming) would be wiped out. The West Coast (Oregon, CA, and Washington mostly, most likely a good chunk of the South West too) would not feel any major aftereffects until at least six months to a year after the eruption, as most of the ash will settle in the Atlantic/Europe/Asia areas.

The Southern Hemisphere will fare the best due to how the air streams conflict with those of the Northern Hemisphere. Africa, Australia, and South America will get a huge influx of refugees from the Northern Hemisphere. Air travel will be dead basically for a good two, three generations because of the ash clouds and whatever remains of North America will be completely restructured.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
Rhykker said:
Lilani said:
Asphalt Soup, now that's a name for a biker bar if I've ever heard one.
Batman eats a hearty breakfast of asphalt soup every morning, giving him that soothing, gravely voice.
I don't believe that, you're going to have to provide some more concrete evidence than that.

In other news, when I first read this I had just been playing Kingdom Hearts II and just finished the Pirates of the Caribbean world, so when I saw your avatar it freaked me out just a bit.
 

Kameburger

Turtle king
Apr 7, 2012
574
0
0
I always feel a bit like I am constantly underestimating the dangers of a "Super Volcano." Like with many environmental phenomenon it is so hard to separate the fiction and reality. What is really going to happen if this volcano full on erupts? If its twice as big as they thought it was when they were scared about it years before, then is this one going to split the Earth in 2 if it goes off?

I mean that movie volcano didn't seem so bad. ( I mean it just seemed to rain ash, and destroy a tiny country town, but the world still worked.

What is the proper level of terror I should feel on a scale of one to ten?
 

Ylla

New member
Jul 14, 2014
102
0
0
Kameburger said:
What is the proper level of terror I should feel on a scale of one to ten?
1....
You cant do anything about it, and if its going to erupt were probably going to know it around 60 secs before, so why bother?

On the bright note (which is ironically, not so bright XD), i'm getting tired of the sun, it gives me a lot of headaches, the ash ejected in the eruption would help me a lot :D..... :(
 

A-D.

New member
Jan 23, 2008
637
0
0
Kameburger said:
What is the proper level of terror I should feel on a scale of one to ten?
Worldwide? Its about a 5. US-specific? That'd be an 8.

Supervolcanos are more "dangerous" because, essentially with a Volcano you have one big mountain that can spew forth lava and ash for a specific amount of time, which can be relatively long, but as said its one mountain essentially. A Supervolcano on the other hand can be one really big one, or several normal-sized Volcanos if it erupts, it'd be essentially several Volcanos erupting at once, at the same spot. Earthquakes, Fissures, Lava, thats just the initial issue and wouldnt cause much damage all things considered, the Ash though is a more significant problem because if Yellowstone or another Supervolcano were to erupt, we have no idea how long that eruption could last, or how much Ash and Dirt would be thrown up. We have very little data, or any theories on just how a supervolcano eruption would be like, given we havent seen one in recorded history.

Suffice to say, if Yellowstone were to erupt, one thing is for certain, Yellowstone would be gone after that.
 

Jacco

New member
May 1, 2011
1,738
0
0
Kameburger said:
I always feel a bit like I am constantly underestimating the dangers of a "Super Volcano." Like with many environmental phenomenon it is so hard to separate the fiction and reality. What is really going to happen if this volcano full on erupts? If its twice as big as they thought it was when they were scared about it years before, then is this one going to split the Earth in 2 if it goes off?

I mean that movie volcano didn't seem so bad. ( I mean it just seemed to rain ash, and destroy a tiny country town, but the world still worked.

What is the proper level of terror I should feel on a scale of one to ten?
lol it won't split the Earth in 2. It's erupted before and we are all still here. And Volcano isn't a particularly accurate movie to base your ideas on. Dante's Peak is a much better depiction of what a good full-scale eruption is like (minus all the dramatic parts to make the movie more exciting; you won't outrun a pyroclastic cloud in a truck with no tires, or really in anything but an F22 for that matter) and it's a decent movie too.

As others said above, the effects would likely not be extinction level, but it would certainly flip the balance of world power and cause a lot of socio-economic problems.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Although the (global) threat of the super volcano under Yellowstone weighs heavy on many people, I'm more concerned as to exactly has been stealing all the picnic baskets...

[sub][sub]Way to trivialise an impending natural disaster, Dave.[/sub][/sub]
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
You know...I'm surprised this wasn't the case sooner. I've been hearing rumblings[footnote]Ba dum tish![/footnote] about increased geological activity in the region, including increased temperatures and subterranean pressures.

Regardless, maybe it's time for another visit to Yellowstone. Haven't been there since I was a wee lad.

Jacco said:
Dante's Peak is a much better depiction of what a good full-scale eruption is like (minus all the dramatic parts to make the movie more exciting; you won't outrun a pyroclastic cloud in a truck with no tires, or really in anything but an F22 for that matter) and it's a decent movie too.
Oh gods....SO much better. Volcano was just painful to watch. Especially the wealth of scenes featuring people standing mere friggin' inches from molten-hot lava without bursting into flames.

However, the scene in Dante's Peak with the boat in the lake of acid was a hell of a stretch. If it was that acidic even the fumes would have killed them.

Even so, absolutely agree. Dante's Peak was not only FAR more accurate but at least marginally watchable.
 

BX3

New member
Mar 7, 2011
659
0
0
There's an Volcanic source melting asphalt? Ah yes, the Yellowstone Volcano, the story that caused me to be slightly depressed for 2 straight months after finding out what it was via a Cracked article. That one.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
Wouldn't there be a way to drain the pressure? If only they could dig into it from the sides or something to drain the pressure a little at a time to prevent it from popping all at once.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
I think Yellowstone IS erupting, has been for the past who-knows-how-many-years. A volcano's one pinprick on the planet, a pimple of the Earth, where tons of pressure builds up and blast out. Suppose your volcano was spread out over an area of open fissures and semi-to-fully liquid areas, with very little real blockage. Old Faithful blasts off like clockwork. Other geological wonders in there are bubbling and fuming and steaming at random. Every now and then, you get a bigger burp and the asphalt melts.

Question: Does Yellowstone actually get enough pressure TO go full blast-off? The way it is, it may let off way too much steam to pose that big long crisis. It may be that in order for it to really erupt big-time, the neutrinos would have to mutate THE LATINOS HAVE MUTATED! something enormous would have to be happening to the planet's pressures to create that force.
 

Mik Sunrider

New member
Dec 21, 2013
69
0
0
http://cdn.damninteresting.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/Yellowstone_Ash_Fall_Map.jpg

That is the last three eruptions ... notice that is the breadbasket for most of the world. So starvation is going to be a lot more common, especially here in the USA. And those of us here in the USA will have to get use to losing our superpower status for a very long time. Of course, won't have to worry about immigration for a long time either.
 

Defenestra

New member
Apr 16, 2009
106
0
0
The chance of that volcano doing anthing more interesting than occasionally shaking or blasting hot water in to the air for the next hundred thousand years is pretty low. When it does go off, the whole world will notice, to a degree ranging from inconvenient to apocalyptic. If you are far away when it goes, it will mess with your grocery store prices pretty badly. If you are in the park when it goes, you will be incinerated before you have time to swear.

Overall current threat level: Trivial.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
-Dragmire- said:
I'm curious what would happen if it erupts.

After a little looking, it seems like the people covering the 'what if?' of this scenario are just trying to sell a doomsday story.
It is a doomsday story. This is one of very few "supervolcanos". supervolcano means that its many times larger than regular volcanos. if it erups in the same manner as other volcanos, the ash thrown into atmosphere is enough to cover entire globe for years. this ash does not allow sunlight in, which means plantlife would be dead. how long do you think we can live without plants?

Xan Krieger said:
Wouldn't there be a way to drain the pressure? If only they could dig into it from the sides or something to drain the pressure a little at a time to prevent it from popping all at once.
if the pressure already exists, and you drain a hole into it, it will explode. for a home experiment take a baloon and try to drill a hole in the side with a nail, see how it reacts.