Does your school not have a gym uniform?AlexTheBucket2112 said:In the video they claim to have tried to respect the dignity of the girl.
Lets do a recap...
...see's naked.
...in a school.
...with others watching. (principal, officer, etc.)
That is every childs worst...fucking...nightmare...
Has the definition of respect changed recently? Did I just not get the memo?
I'm guessing that with stiffer drugs (i.e, ones you could actually get high from), it becomes a full cavity search. At least, in that Principal's mind.Jeyal said:Is it different if she's got a stiffer drug than ibuprofen? At what point is it okay?
If she's selling caffiene pills to your child is it okay? What about cigarrettes? Zoloft? A knife?
It's setting a dangerous precedent regardless of which way this case is decided. On one hand, you are further stripping the rights to privacy of school age children. On the other hand, you potentially risk danger to students and faculty alike.
It's easy to decry it in this situation, but there is validity to the argument of schools needing security.
No, clearly the preferred method for this level of suspect would be full body dissection. Protect the students at all costs.orannis62 said:I'm guessing that with stiffer drugs (i.e, ones you could actually get high from), it becomes a full cavity search. At least, in that Principal's mind.
True. As I said earlier, they seemed to think "Hm...that girl who brought Ibuprofen to school said that she got it from that girl. Clearly, she isn't just trying to get away without punishment, but is instead an informant! Huzzah!"Naeo said:The student had had absolutely no disciplinary actions against them in the past and was a straight-A student. Then they get a random on the spot no-parents-notified-at-all-by-the-school-ever strip search because (correct me if I'm wrong; heard this on the radio this morning) another student brought the single Ibuprofen tablet to school.
Yeah there were absolutely no grounds for it.
No we bring our own clothes to dress out in. I think I see where your going. The situation of dressing out for gym is different. First: we are not visible to the opposite sex (IDK if the girl was). Second: The situations are far from similar. If your being striped down by a principal and for possible drug possession, your probably very close to messing up your pants. Its an awkward situation where the girl was probably scared out of her wits.WhatsaVagina said:Does your school not have a gym uniform?AlexTheBucket2112 said:In the video they claim to have tried to respect the dignity of the girl.
Lets do a recap...
...see's naked.
...in a school.
...with others watching. (principal, officer, etc.)
That is every childs worst...fucking...nightmare...
Has the definition of respect changed recently? Did I just not get the memo?
Mate, don't worry 2010 is almost here and everyone whose fucked around better hope the bibles wrong lol ><SyphonX said:A thirteen year old girl was strip searched in Arizona's Safford Middle School until she was completely nude. The parent was never contacted and the search was conducted immediately on-the-spot in one of the school's offices.
What would have been so dire as to require an explicit strip search of a child? What possession instituted an immediate search? A weapon you could assume, perhaps a dangerous illicit narcotic of the sort?
Ibuprofen, otherwise known as Motrin.
Again, the parent was never informed by any staff and only found out until the child told her when she was picked up by her mother later that day.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/04/19/scotus.strip.search/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqB5qVzI888
It is currently being taken to the Supreme Court where they will ACTUALLY DISCUSS whether or not it was warranted. Really? This requires a discussion in the supreme court when it's a clear violation of the 4th Amendment of the Constitution. For Ibuprofen of all things. This puts the matter in very dangerous territory, because if the ruling somehow passes as the search being acceptable then it will deem it perfectly acceptable in the future for all time until it is brought to the supreme court again, which would never happen. Completely allowing any school nearly just ground to strip search your child, your young brother or sister, niece.. think about this.
This is something you would expect in the most corrupt and disturbing fascist states in history. The mere notion that the act is going to be discussed from being right or wrong in the supreme court sickens me. Though it really doesn't fucking surprise me anymore.
O, I get it. she was planting pills around for Louis to find during the apocalypse.JoshasorousRex said:PILLS HERE!
Who the hell thought that the search was even necessary or a good idea?
Well of course, someone has to fuel his addictionMusic Mole said:O, I get it. she was planting pills around for Louis to find during the apocalypse.JoshasorousRex said:PILLS HERE!
Who the hell thought that the search was even necessary or a good idea?
lately I have seen quite a few news stories around here, and I click on them going "please let this just be a tasteless fake news joke" only to find they are not. Why do I do that to myself?tiberseptim said:Here, here. America, the beautiful.SyphonX said:This is something you would expect in the most corrupt and disturbing fascist states in history. The mere notion that the act is going to be discussed from being right or wrong in the supreme court sickens me. Though it really doesn't fucking surprise me anymore.
did the cops know PRIOR to the search what kind of drug it was?SyphonX said:A thirteen year old girl was strip searched in Arizona's Safford Middle School until she was completely nude. The parent was never contacted and the search was conducted immediately on-the-spot in one of the school's offices.
What would have been so dire as to require an explicit strip search of a child? What possession instituted an immediate search? A weapon you could assume, perhaps a dangerous illicit narcotic of the sort?
Ibuprofen, otherwise known as Motrin.
Again, the parent was never informed by any staff and only found out until the child told her when she was picked up by her mother later that day.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/04/19/scotus.strip.search/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqB5qVzI888
It is currently being taken to the Supreme Court where they will ACTUALLY DISCUSS whether or not it was warranted. Really? This requires a discussion in the supreme court when it's a clear violation of the 4th Amendment of the Constitution. For Ibuprofen of all things. This puts the matter in very dangerous territory, because if the ruling somehow passes as the search being acceptable then it will deem it perfectly acceptable in the future for all time until it is brought to the supreme court again, which would never happen. Completely allowing any school nearly just ground to strip search your child, your young brother or sister, niece.. think about this.
This is something you would expect in the most corrupt and disturbing fascist states in history. The mere notion that the act is going to be discussed from being right or wrong in the supreme court sickens me. Though it really doesn't fucking surprise me anymore.
yea, did they know BEFORE the search, or did they find out it was Ibuprofen AFTER the searchfontlas said:That's weird. I carried Ibuprofen all the time to school. I never got stripped search... Awww.
Seriously, though what a fucking dick of a principal and drugs!?!?! Ibuprofen? Seriously?!?!
Let me say WTF!!!!
I think the girl that had blamed the girl who got stripped had Ibuprofen. So ya, I think they knew. But even if the didn't it's a bit unnecessary to strip down a 13-year old.JWAN said:yea, did they know BEFORE the search, or did they find out it was Ibuprofen AFTER the searchfontlas said:That's weird. I carried Ibuprofen all the time to school. I never got stripped search... Awww.
Seriously, though what a fucking dick of a principal and drugs!?!?! Ibuprofen? Seriously?!?!
Let me say WTF!!!!