The other thing being ignored is how the current iteration of Lara won't get off her ass unless someone else goes and does the thing she refuses to do and dies in the process of doing the actual hard work of getting the next macguffin(don't plan on playing Rise until it gets ported sometime in the next six to eight years if Arkham Knight is any indication, so she might actually do something useful on her own).Samtemdo8 said:Or we can just you know keep Lara as an animated CG character? I mean none of these actress' look like Lara Croft too me.
Yeah, she also looks the part and is a decent enough actress. I'd like to see that.linkblade91 said:Doesn't Camilla Luddington demand a spot on the list somewhere? After all, Luddington is the voice-actress and model for the rebooted Tomb Raider games. Who could be "more in line with the current iteration of her character" than the lady who is the current iteration of Lara Croft? lol
Why not? She can do intellectual, nuanced, and even action.RJ 17 said:Emma Watson? As much as I like her, getting her to play Lara? Ummmmm...how about no?
Eh, I can see intellectual and nuanced sorta...but action? I don't think I've disliked a movie that she's been in, but the closest she's been to action is punching Malfoy and running through the woods with CGI...bigfatcarp93 said:Why not? She can do intellectual, nuanced, and even action.RJ 17 said:Emma Watson? As much as I like her, getting her to play Lara? Ummmmm...how about no?
Whilst I love this version of Lara, and believe Luddington's performance is superb, does she really have the in-front-of-camera acting chops to nail a live action version? Her live action CV's not exactly inspiring.linkblade91 said:Doesn't Camilla Luddington demand a spot on the list somewhere? After all, Luddington is the voice-actress and model for the rebooted Tomb Raider games. Who could be "more in line with the current iteration of her character" than the lady who is the current iteration of Lara Croft?
Dude, really? What do you expect, for her to do her own stunts or something? Very, VERY few actors do that. What she's done, herself, in Potter is easily enough to qualify her. Looking strained, frightened, determined, winded, whatever.Redryhno said:Eh, I can see intellectual and nuanced sorta...but action? I don't think I've disliked a movie that she's been in, but the closest she's been to action is punching Malfoy and running through the woods with CGI...bigfatcarp93 said:Why not? She can do intellectual, nuanced, and even action.RJ 17 said:Emma Watson? As much as I like her, getting her to play Lara? Ummmmm...how about no?
I never said any of that. So that's sorta on yo. Bnd I never meant anything but that I haven't seen her do action...bigfatcarp93 said:Dude, really? What do you expect, for her to do her own stunts or something? Very, VERY few actors do that. What she's done, herself, in Potter is easily enough to qualify her. Looking strained, frightened, determined, winded, whatever.Redryhno said:Eh, I can see intellectual and nuanced sorta...but action? I don't think I've disliked a movie that she's been in, but the closest she's been to action is punching Malfoy and running through the woods with CGI...bigfatcarp93 said:Why not? She can do intellectual, nuanced, and even action.RJ 17 said:Emma Watson? As much as I like her, getting her to play Lara? Ummmmm...how about no?
EDIT: Though as a counterpoint I will admit that she may not have the physicality for the Croft look. I'm not saying she's strictly ideal, but dismissing her out of hand seems iffy.