I agree, he should definitely be considered first. Though what he needs isn't a shave, he specifically needs the facial hair for it.immortalfrieza said:Ross Scott, the only guy in the world that could make Gordon Freeman talking sound right, and he could even look like him with a shave and a haircut.
I was just about to bemoan the lack of Bryan Cranston love, well done sir!Senneca said:I'm going to just assume we're willing to overlook how terrible of an idea a Half-Life movie would be, and point out the only logical choice would be Bryan Cranston. We've already established he can play the science nerd/ badass killer. Why even consider anyone else?
This guy.immortalfrieza said:Ross Scott, the only guy in the world that could make Gordon Freeman talking sound right, and he could even look like him with a shave and a haircut.
Or this. Or something like this.COMaestro said:I haven't even read the article, but I'm willing to bet they are all wrong. The only way to do a Half-Life movie correctly is to do it like one of those filmed documentary movies (Blair Witch, Cloverfield, etc), where Freeman is the camera. And he needs to be a mute.
![]()
And here I was thinking I was going to be the first to suggest that, but turns out the thread is starting to fill up with people who all have the same idea.Senneca said:...the only logical choice would be Bryan Cranston.
Yeah, because Freeman is known for his verbostiy.We know from 500 Days of Summer that he can navigate the clunkiest of verbose Kevin Smith-style dialogue, and we know from Looper that he is perfectly believable as a stoic killing machine.