Preaching to the choir makes enough money to keep the yearly cycle going, sadly. The upside is that these films tend to be so incompetently shot and/or directed and/or written and/or acted that there's occasionally a fantastically bad one to look forward to on Midnight Screenings - along with the often entertaining anecdotes about who else was present in the theatre.erttheking said:The problem with these films is that they confirm the existance of God, but only people who already believed in God watches them. As a result, intentional or not, it comes off as a circle jerk.
See, this sort of thing happens *all* the time in these Christian affirmation movies, and it bothers me far more than the preachiness, or cheesiness.It kills the sick child of a non-believer, while saving the one from a believer, and then the father of the kid who died instantly believes the family's story and is now, himself, a believer - and his change of faith means that there's no way that anyone should question this story.
The problem with religion or atheism in movies and tv is that there is a god in movies and tv, its the director.erttheking said:The problem with these films is that they confirm the existance of God, but only people who already believed in God watches them. As a result, intentional or not, it comes off as a circle jerk.
It's especially funny because the era of prophecy has ended according to Christian tradition. Oh, and Islam as well but that's beside the point. There was even an added bonus of 'and if anyone says otherwise, they're an asshat'.hentropy said:It always seem hypocritical to me that these kinds of religious folk want to talk constantly about having faith- but at the same time, welcome any and all "proof" to "affirm" their faith. Doesn't that defeat the whole point of having faith?
From a theological perspective, if someone "goes to heaven" and "talks to God and/or Jesus", they are prophets, which is a pretty big freaking deal. If a child had a fever dream in the middle ages and say they talked to God, their parents would tell them to shut the hell up about that, as claiming to be a prophet and being unable to prove it came with extremely serious consequences.
I suppose you could chalk it up to new-world willy-nilly fantastic Christianity, but it seems like these movies do less to actually inspire or "affirm" genuine faith, and do more to provide what they see as "evidence" of God and the Bible in the face of a lot of counter-evidence.
I always figured Satan was like a second rate loan shark. You can get a miracle from heaven if your a decent Christian, and then pay it back with a lifetime of faith and proscelatizing. If your a filthy sodomite, however, and your soul-credit sucks, then you'll have to get a back alley loan from old Lucy. Which is all well and good, but I heard the interest is soul crushing.Xsjadoblayde said:Now...i don't want to force anybody to reveal their sources for their miracles, but don't they all allegedly come from heaven? Isn't heaven the sole provider of miracles? Or does hell get in on the action.
No one finds it more worrying than the average Christian. Even people I know who liked God's Not Dead were irritated by "offing the atheist".rcs619 said:I dunno, using the God-induced deaths of unbelievers/people the Christians this movie is targeted at don't like as some kind of cheap prop just speaks to a very worrying worldview.
Just wait until the sequel, when an evil atheist takes the good Christian woman to court over her saying the "Golden Rule" in answer to a student's question.lacktheknack said:No one finds it more worrying than the average Christian. Even people I know who liked God's Not Dead were irritated by "offing the atheist".
lacktheknack said:One day, there's going to be a faith movie that my Mom and I can watch that we'll both like.
Not this day, though.
I feel like Christian genre films that encourage Christians is missing the point of a powerful tool of evangelicism.Albino Boo said:Ahh so preachiness is ok as long as it's against evil stock brokers in the big short but not when its Christians. This film is a genre film that is not designed for you in just the same way the the big short is genre film designed for you.
It is true. You're watching the work of the creator. But unlike The Creator in The Bible and Christian, Jewish and Islamic belief, this creator is a flawed human who will communicate a biased world view.Worgen said:The problem with religion or atheism in movies and tv is that there is a god in movies and tv, it's the director.erttheking said:The problem with these films is that they confirm the existance of God, but only people who already believed in God watches them. As a result, intentional or not, it comes off as a circle jerk.
A film is there to make money by appealing to a target audience. Christian films are genre films in the same way western or kung fu films are. Each have their own conventions which the audience want to see.scw55 said:I feel like Christian genre films that encourage Christians is missing the point of a powerful tool of evangelicism.Albino Boo said:Ahh so preachiness is ok as long as it's against evil stock brokers in the big short but not when its Christians. This film is a genre film that is not designed for you in just the same way the the big short is genre film designed for you.
It's a chance for Christianity to be accessible to people from outside The Church. But if the film is merely patting the back of existing believers, it's just going to alienate Agnostic or Atheist people. It will push them further away.
I think it risks exploiting people's faith to provide something that can be supplied in another way.
Why is it so hard to produce a good film that portrays what it is to be a Christian to the masses?