You give idiots too much credit.Beery said:"it disheartens me that people think saying stuff like "If you like this game you are clearly some kid of closet homosexual" is any better than shouting "fag" at someone over Xbox Live, it isn't."
You're confused. Calling someone a 'closet homosexual' is not the same as calling them a homosexual AT ALL. 'Closet' is the operative word. While there's nothing at all wrong with being homosexual there IS definitely something wrong with the idea that it's healthy to hide your sexual identity.
This game's only value, as far as I can see, is in helping certain people pretend to be macho while clutching their joystick and avoiding the company of the opposite sex.
No I dont. Graphics are one of the least important factors of a game. A game is successful if it is fun. Maybe you mean 'meathead gamers' as I call them.Sylocat said:The problem I have with Gears is different, and a more serious one: The graphics are held up as the pinnacle of next-gen gaming.
Yeah, yeah, it's impressive from a technical standpoint, I know that. The shading and textures are very well-done and the architecture is mapped out amazingly well. I just came out of the game design program at MATC, I know nice graphic specs when I see them.
And the spectacularly high-quality graphics... look boring as hell. There is nothing interesting about the way the game looks. Every damn level in Gears of War looks exactly alike, and that would be bad even if they didn't look spectacularly uninteresting.
So why are the graphics in this game so popular? Very simple: "Hardcore" gamers are ashamed of the fact that they like video games. They don't like the designation that they're playing with toys, since they're determined to act macho at all costs. This leads to them craving "realism" in games, even at the expense of fun (in a way, especially at the expense of fun) so they can pretend they're not sitting on their ass playing with a toy.