SimuLord post=6.72223.763582 said:
Playing Tecmo Super Bowl as "the San Francisco Giants"? I assume he meant the 49ers with Montana and Rice. And "snausages"? Those were a brand of dog treats, which brings up an image of frat boys, all right. It brings up an image of fraternity initiations.
You're right there, I meant the 49ers. But snausages is slang in my group of friends for sausages of any kind. We think it's funny. Good catch though. Glad you're reading with a fine-toothed comb. It's so much more fun that way, isn't it?
SimuLord post=6.72223.763582 said:
Would it kill a gaming publication not to play into the nerd stereotype any more than necessary? As a sports fanatic by day (ESPN.com is my browser homepage) and a hardcore gamer by night, the jock in me really doesn't appreciate the "woe is me, jocks are so much cooler than me" self-loathing that so many geeks seem so insistent on practicing. We get it. Nerds internally debate whether to ask out girls while jocks simply go out and get laid. The trope's been done to death.
Not that I have to prove myself to a forum commenter, but I did get laid in college. Did I mention that I was a drama major? If you don't believe me, go to a cast party after a play someday. You'd be amazed at what happens.
I've been a Red Sox fan since the '86 season broke my heart, and I still follow my alma mater's basketball team religiously. I also play D&D every week and log too many hours on my dwarf paladin in WOW. Been married for five years too, to a woman! And I asked her!
Point is, you're the only one perpetrating stereotypes here. It is possible to be a geek and also like sports. It's possible to like gaming but not be able to identify with cocky meatheads who have no tolerance for something that is different than them. The article described a specific instance in my life in which social gaming transcended the trope which you are railing against. Me, the nerd, was able to make friends with those who would normally regard me with disdain.
I find it odd, Simulord, that your comment seemed to ignore the basic point of the article and infer a stereotype that just wasn't there.