On Multiplayer
Yahtzee explains why multiplayer isn't the most important part of a game.
Read Full Article
Yahtzee explains why multiplayer isn't the most important part of a game.
Read Full Article
This bit is so true. This was a great read because multiplayer should never be the first priority.Article said:5. Because people are shit.
When you play online with someone, you're not a human being to them. You're just another little mewling voice in the magic box of secrets. If you're not in the same actual room, poised to punch them in the face, only their entertainment matters. You might as well just be an AI bot that swears. Surely playing against an actual AI bot would be preferable. They might not speak and get stuck in corners a lot, but at least they'll never ragequit, and you can program them not to shoot you, and you don't have to pay broadband internet fees for the privilege.
I'm a believer of Penny Arcade's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory: "Ordinary person + audience + anonymity = fuckwad." I would suggest a few alterations, though, such as removing the "+ anonymity" part. And the "+ audience" part. The default state of all human beings is fuckwad. The only reason they don't always act like fuckwads is because they're afraid of getting punched. So they're not just fuckwads, they're cowardly fuckwads.
Huh. I thought that was perhaps the weakest of the five points he provided. I've met seriously decent people online. Yahtzee's cynicism seems to extend far beyond my own. I can't really say I'm surprised though.Aura Guardian said:snip
Lucky you. I haven't met a decent/nice person online. Just people yelling [add any "insult"]latenightapplepie said:Huh. I thought that was perhaps the weakest of the five points he provided. I've met seriously decent people online. Yahtzee's cynicism seems to extend far beyond my own. I can't really say I'm surprised though.Aura Guardian said:snip
And was it just me or was the article conspicuously lacking in any discussion of non-online multiplayer?
He's already told you what he'd say to those people - it's all there in the article. Just link them to it.jtesauro said:Yahtzee,
Ok so I'm going into this fully expecting to get ignored, but what the hell, it's worth a shot.
As a side project/night job sort of thing, I've started up a website dedicated to gaming, reviews and features mostly. So far so good, but here's the rub, I hate multiplayer in games as a rule. For alot of the reasons you've already stated, I dislike playing games online.
So now when I publish a review of Halo 3: ODST or Call of Duty and I get flack for not going into the multiplayer, what do I tell people when I'm accused of critical unfairness? So far it's been mostly, "Fuck you, I don't like multiplayer and I made no pretense otherwise" but I admit it's probably worth trying to flesh out that logic to be fair to readers who may expect a more comprehensive review.
Any thoughts from a professional like yourself are welcome here. ( But yeah, I'm not holding my breath. ) Either way, thanks for the article, entertaining as always.
Noob, I tottaly would have killed you if I hadn't uh... Been Drinking coke!Aura Guardian said:Just people yelling [add any "insult"]
The split-screen LAN section about switching over to Tekken was about just that, so yeah it was you.latenightapplepie said:Huh. I thought that was perhaps the weakest of the five points he provided. I've met seriously decent people online. Yahtzee's cynicism seems to extend far beyond my own. I can't really say I'm surprised though.Aura Guardian said:snip
And was it just me or was the article conspicuously lacking in any discussion of non-online multiplayer?