StarCraft II Will Have Monthly Fees, But Only In Russia

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
StarCraft II Will Have Monthly Fees, But Only In Russia



Would-be StarCraft II [http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=65548] buyers in Russia will have the option to buy the game at a greatly reduced cost, but after a year they'll have to pay a monthly subscription fee.

Okay, wait. If you just read the part of the title that says "StarCraft II Will Have Monthly Fees," then just take a deep breath and put the pitchforks and torches down. It's not that clear-cut at all.

Last week, Blizzard announced that StarCraft II would be retailing for $60 here in the States - just like Warcraft III and Diablo II - unless you wanted to pick up the $100 super-special-awesome mega collector's edition. However, regional prices do vary, thanks to currency exchange rates, taxes, and the like.

As it turns out, someone in Blizzard Europe either thought that people living in Russia couldn't afford a $60 game, or that they wouldn't pay for it - Russia is infamous for record rates of software piracy. A Blizzard representative has confirmed that [http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=24038768365&sid=5015] the pricing plan for Russian gamers will be one based on "installments."

Essentially, StarCraft II will be sold in Russia in two versions: A standard DVD case for 999 rubles ($34.36, £22.38 or €25.41 - approximately half the price of the regular European version) or a jewel-case version for 499 rubles ($17.16, £11.13 or €12.63). Players who shell out 999 rubles will have a year of access to the Battle.net multiplayer - but only on Russian servers, not with the whole of Europe - while those who buy the cheaper version will get four months of access to the same.

After the time has run out, the players will have to pay 100 rubles ($3.44, £2.23, €2.53) a month for continued access to Battle.net. However, Russian StarCraft II buyers will, at any time, be able to "upgrade" to the complete version of the game that will be sold elsewhere in Europe for "about 30 Euros," giving them full, unlimited access to Battle.net there on out.

The Blizzard rep confirmed to worried Polish gamers that this pricing model would only apply to Russia, and not any other countries anywhere in Europe.

I'm betting that most of you shared my initial reaction on reading that SC2 would have a subscription - uneasy surprise - but the more I read about this, the more I think it's actually a very clever way to approach selling a product in a part of the world where people have comparatively less disposable income, and where piracy is so high as a result.

I'd be willing to bet that a lot of gamers - Russian or not - wouldn't be playing StarCraft II for more than a year (some might not even stay four months), so they'll never have to worry about the subscription fees. For those who are interested in more long-term play, there's the option to upgrade for a one-off payment.

Giving people options - especially on how they pay for things - isn't a bad thing, is it? Of course, that won't stop the knee-jerk reactions from people who read "monthly subscription" and scream fleeing for the hills, but what can you do?

Update: According to Blizzard poster Xordiah [http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=24262386737&sid=5010&pageNo=3], Russian gamers will have the option to buy the standard European version for the full cost and not have to bother with any of this at all:

"Of course that is also an option that Russian players have. The subscription model is mainly for those players that would not be able to afford the European version. This will also give them the option of buying the less expensive game and then afterwards deciding that the game is worth upgrading to the European version and as such they will have access to European as well as the Russian servers."

(Via IncGamers [http://starcraft.incgamers.com/blog/comments/monthly-fee-for-battle.net-in-russia/])

Permalink
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Simalacrum said:
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
No, there is. You buy the game and then immediately upgrade for about 30 Euros (which was the price listed on IncGamers, I don't know what that translates into in Rubles).
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
John Funk said:
I'd be willing to bet that a lot of gamers - Russian or not - wouldn't be playing StarCraft II for more than a year (some might not even stay four months), so they'll never have to worry about the subscription fees.
Isn't Starcraft still being played a lot around the world and now only starting to be replaced by the Starcraft 2 Beta? Given the longevity of Blizzard games in terms of player base, not to mention that they have two major expansion packs for the game ready to be brought out, are you sure that few people will be playing it after only a year?
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
John Funk said:
Simalacrum said:
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
No, there is. You buy the game and then immediately upgrade for about 30 Euros (which was the price listed on IncGamers, I don't know what that translates into in Rubles).
...*reads article again*

Oh yeah!

If thats the case, then fair enough... that makes more sense.
 

Tehlanna TPX

New member
Mar 23, 2010
284
0
0
Seems like a smart, and practical, business decision to me.

I don't get all the pissing and moaning about monthly fees. But, people have cried about them for as long as there -have- been monthly fees, so... guess I'll just put my earplugs back in.
 

SniperWolf427

New member
Jun 27, 2008
974
0
0
Options are always good, however, I feel like they should still include full 60 dollar (whatever that translates to in Russian currency) options in retail stores. It seems almost like a slap to Russian consumers if they still have to activate their product later on for 30 more Rubles, simply because an American company thought they were too poor to pay the full price immediately.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
John Funk said:
Simalacrum said:
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
No, there is. You buy the game and then immediately upgrade for about 30 Euros (which was the price listed on IncGamers, I don't know what that translates into in Rubles).
That would be approximately 1200 roubles.
Hooray for useless information.
OT: Do not like this.
Seriously, this sounds pretty dodgy.
 

microhive

New member
Mar 27, 2009
489
0
0
Heard about this last week. It's an awesome idea actually.

Anyhow, I read that this wasn't due to Blizzard but some Russian request. Got that info from a poster on TeamLiquid but not sure of its validity.
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
Mackheath said:
Well, whats the odds that the BlizzCon 2010 plane crashes after this?
Ohhh...Topical!

But, it does seem a little buit of a farce...not fair to them at all..
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Not G. Ivingname said:
John Funk said:
I'd be willing to bet that a lot of gamers - Russian or not - wouldn't be playing StarCraft II for more than a year (some might not even stay four months), so they'll never have to worry about the subscription fees.
Isn't Starcraft still being played a lot around the world and now only starting to be replaced by the Starcraft 2 Beta? Given the longevity of Blizzard games in terms of player base, not to mention that they have two major expansion packs for the game ready to be brought out, are you sure that few people will be playing it after only a year?
Oh, I'm sure plenty of people will be playing it after a year, but those are the people who will probably find enough value in it to want to spend the extra money to upgrade to the unlimited version.

JourneyThroughHell said:
John Funk said:
Simalacrum said:
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
No, there is. You buy the game and then immediately upgrade for about 30 Euros (which was the price listed on IncGamers, I don't know what that translates into in Rubles).
That would be approximately 1200 roubles.
Hooray for useless information.
OT: Do not like this.
Seriously, this sounds pretty dodgy.
Thanks for the clarification. Which is a bit more than the original box price... assuming you wanted to upgrade to the full version off the bat, then, there doesn't seem to be any reason to go with the 999 ruble version.

redmarine said:
Heard about this last week. It's an awesome idea actually.

Anyhow, I read that this wasn't due to Blizzard but some Russian request. Got that info from a poster on TeamLiquid but not sure of its validity.
Oh? If you could get me a source on that it'd be interesting.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
John Funk said:
Not G. Ivingname said:
John Funk said:
I'd be willing to bet that a lot of gamers - Russian or not - wouldn't be playing StarCraft II for more than a year (some might not even stay four months), so they'll never have to worry about the subscription fees.
Isn't Starcraft still being played a lot around the world and now only starting to be replaced by the Starcraft 2 Beta? Given the longevity of Blizzard games in terms of player base, not to mention that they have two major expansion packs for the game ready to be brought out, are you sure that few people will be playing it after only a year?
Oh, I'm sure plenty of people will be playing it after a year, but those are the people who will probably find enough value in it to want to spend the extra money to upgrade to the unlimited version.
Oh... sorry, didn't know what you mean.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Dude could I have that option here in the states? I don't care about multiplayer battle.net because I suck at RTS but I would like to beat up on the computer and play through the storyline.

Go go blizzard, give us $17 option in the US!
 

Monocle Man

New member
Apr 14, 2009
631
0
0
John Funk said:
Simalacrum said:
So, wait, theres no option for Russian players to buy a more expensive non-sucsciption based version?

Giving people the choice to may monthly and pay cheaper is one thing... giving people that as the only choice when there are other ways available is another.
No, there is. You buy the game and then immediately upgrade for about 30 Euros (which was the price listed on IncGamers, I don't know what that translates into in Rubles).
What if they are unable to pay online? Because of a lack of creditcards, lack of Paypal support in Russia or similar?
They'd be left in the very cold if they can't buy the complete game from the store, aren't they?
Obviously they would be a minority, but the point stands.
 
Feb 19, 2010
964
0
0
shit, i hope this dosnt count in ukraine.

OT:a very bad money sucking idea. i'd rather shell out 200 grivins
(1 euro is 12 grivins work it out for yorself)

to not pay for fees like that. blizzard are getting evil.
 

Corven

Forever Gonzo
Sep 10, 2008
2,022
0
0
In other words, if they pay the original full price for the game they don't get stuck with a monthly fee.

If that's the case then why did Blizzard even bother making these other subscription based editions at all, since nobody with a working brain would keep shelling out a monthly fee if it just costs an extra 30 bucks to upgrade to the normal free version.