$2.50 Reviews: Dark Shadows (2012)

Recommended Videos

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.855069-Marter-to-the-Movies-Begin-Again>Begin AgainNext Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.855300-2-50-Reviews-Airplane-1980>Airplane!
http://www.pictureshack.us/images/87929_250_Reviews.gif
Dark Shadows
http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/16/09/70/40/poste131.jpg

Based on a soap opera that had something like a thousand episodes during the course of its run, Dark Shadows is another movie in which Johnny Depp acts like a Johnny Depp character. Oh, and it has other people acting strange, too, simply for the sake of it. It's about a 200-year-old vampire being set free after being buried alive, and how he's going to deal with the silly people -- his descendants -- who now run his estate.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="left"]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/16/09/70/40/clipb148.jpg[/Img_Inline]

I should back up. The film begins approximately 200 years earlier, before Barnabas Collins (Depp) was a vampire. He fell in love, but not with the right woman. A jealous witch, who was acting as a maid, cursed him and then locked him away and buried him. Her name is Angelique (Eva Green), and she winds up being the villain, even 200 years later. In present day (1976), she has essentially become the beloved leader of the entire town. She runs the primary fishing company and this has drained the Collins' fortune, as it was they who originally established the fishery.

The present-day Collins family consists of these people: Elizabeth (Michelle Pfeiffer); Carolyn (Chloë Grace Moretz), the teenage girl; David (Gulliver McGrath), the young boy who sees ghosts; Roger (Johnny Lee Miller), someone whose role I'm not quite sure; Dr. Hoffman (Helena Bonham Carter), David's psychiatrist; Willie (Jackie Earle Haley), the caretaker; and Victoria (Bella Heathcote), who looks a suspicious amount like Barnabas' former lover, probably because they're both played by Bella Heathcote. No points for guessing what happens in respect to that.

What a cast, huh? Wouldn't it be nice if this didn't transform into the Johnny Depp show? But you know it will. The film is directed by Tim Burton, who cast his most favorite actor ever in the lead role. Of course it's going to be all about him. And, sure enough, as soon as Barnabas is released from his earthly prison (he was buried in the ground, you see), it becomes all Depp, all the time. That's fun for a while, but since we've seen it before, it grows tiresome rather fast. And without an actual plot, we're left basically watching Depp wander his way through various, semi-connected, events.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="right"]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/16/09/70/40/clipb149.jpg[/Img_Inline]

I'm not saying that Dark Shadows is without promise or that it's completely lacking in fun. If you're not burnt out on Depp acting silly, you're likely going to have a grand time. When someone from 200 years ago comes to the present day and is scared of all the new technologies, that's funny. It just can't carry a film. The problem here is that it sort of tries to, and that's just not fair to Depp. He's given such little story to work with that he really does often seem lost.

I suppose one can focus on the Gothic aesthetic with which Burton fills Dark Shadows. This is a great looking film, if nothing else. That's also not enough to carry a production whose running time is almost two hours. Maybe a 90-minute film can get by with this slight a story and characters, but this one can't do it. It can look as pretty as punch, but without any reason to care, you might as well just take a trip to the local art gallery. Or the internet, which has millions of Gothic paintings you can see.

I ... I struggled to find the point, okay? I can't justify telling you to watch it, because I can't think of anything that I took from it other than a little bit of fun at Depp's expense and the gorgeous visuals. There's barely any plot, the characters are shallower than skin-deep, there isn't anything on its mind, and most of the actors are just going through the motions. A great cast has been assembled here, but most of them don't get to do much of anything.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="180" Caption="" align="left"]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/16/09/70/40/clipb150.jpg[/Img_Inline]

Well, there are two actors who stand out. I've already mentioned Depp, who brings some comedy to the role, which I don't think a lot of actors would have been able to do. Eva Green is the other one, who here puts on a spotty but good enough American accent and plays the role as hammy as possible, ensuring that whenever she's on-screen, we have something to watch. I wish the roles were flipped. She could play the protagonist, and Depp would be the villain. That might have been even more fun.

But, alas, that isn't the case. The film is an adaptation of a previous series, after all, and the original Dark Shadows has 1,000+ episodes from which to draw ideas, and flipping around key characters would only anger fans. It's those fans, coincidentally, who should watch this new version. They'll at least have something to which they can compare it. For everyone else? It's too empty to recommend seeing.

Dark Shadows is a film that exists so Johnny Depp can do his Johnny Depp thing, Tim Burton can do his Tim Burton thing, and everyone else can stand around watching them do their thing while nothing gets accomplished and millions of dollars get wasted. (Okay, Eva Green also joins in for brief spurts, which is enjoyable.) It looks good, it has some funny moments, but it's so completely shallow and devoid of plot and depth that once you get over Depp being moderately funny and the Gothic aesthetic, there's nothing to keep you watching for almost two hours. Spend your time in a better way.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be notified whenever a new review is posted, please join this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
Talk to me on the Twitter, <url=https://twitter.com/martertweet>@martertweet.
 

shogunblade

New member
Apr 13, 2009
1,541
0
0
I actually have a bad memory about this movie: Back when I was working in the movie theater, I ended up having to set this movie's 35mm up for a private showing, this was after we finished showing the movie for the week. I come in and thread the movie, it's all ready to go, I come in the next day, about to start the movie, it was maybe about 6:00 in the evening, and I'm told by my boss that the private showing cancelled. That sucked, but I could still break down the movie, so I didn't have to sit and watch it for the third time.

The problem is that when you thread a movie, you have to play the entire movie in order for it to become stationary on the platter system that we have, otherwise, you have to hold onto this movie while you rewind it back onto a reel, which take a very long time to do, makes an hour long job, in most cases about four hours long or so. While I'm rewinding this movie, I think to myself that this is taking too long to do, so I decide to start speeding up the process. Again, there is nothing stationary in the center of the film holding it onto the platter system, which means it is freewheeling at this point. I turn the speed up just a little more, and then a second later... the movie clatters to the floor. This movie is now in a pile, and I was maybe three and a half reels into a six reel movie. Ouch.

It took me a day and a half to get this movie back onto the reels, meant to be picked up by UPS on Thursday. Thankfully, it was only Wednesday.

Because of this event in my life, I have a greater respect for projectionists then I ever had before, as I had to fix this mess all by myself. It also means that I don't like this movie very much. Whenever it comes on, I actually get physically ill, because I remember what happened when we had this movie and what I ended up doing wrong so many years ago.

OT: OF what I did remember of this movie before the incident, I thought the first half was excellent, absolutely beautiful, with amazing Gothic imagery, but the 2nd and 3rd half didn't work as well as I would have hoped. The Dark humor is too disorienting to be funny, the 3rd act reveal with Chloe Grace Moretz is not funny, Christopher Lee is used for two seconds and then dropped off on this movie, and having Jackie Earle Haley as the groundskeeper when he has since become a better actor in recent years kind of sat wrong with me. With an amazing Classic Rock Soundtrack being the most memorable to me (Exceptions of "Superfly" and The Carpenters notwithstanding), and some funny parts here and there, plus a final battle that was pretty cool, I couldn't recommended it at all. I do agree, Marter. The movie is too much Depp, not enough Depth.

Great Review, Marter.
 

Bofus Teefus

New member
Jan 29, 2009
1,188
0
0
I don't envy reviewing this movie, since it seems like most watchers have the exact same things to say about it. We all sound like we're repeating each other.
Marter said:
I'm not saying that Dark Shadows is without promise or that it's completely lacking in fun. If you're not burnt out on Depp acting silly, you're likely going to have a grand time. When someone from 200 years ago comes to the present day and is scared of all the new technologies, that's funny. It just can't carry a film. The problem here is that it sort of tries to, and that's just not fair to Depp. He's given such little story to work with that he really does often seem lost.
I've been thinking about something lately. Think back to Jim Carey in the truly original Ace Ventura: Pet Detective. I hadn't seen anything like it, nor had I seen a character quite like Ace Ventura... Pet Detective. This was one of the funniest things I'd ever seen. Now fast forward through the sequel, The Mask, Dumb and Dumber, and the rest of the Jim Carey collection where he more or less played the same jackass over and over again, and I got to the point in the late 90's where I couldn't stand anything with him in it. It made me reluctant to watch anything with him in it, even when he doesn't play his "Ace" persona. I hate to say it, but I'm starting to think of Johnny Depp as the next Jim Carey, if he isn't already. To be fair, though, Depp varies himself by playing many different shades of quirky, but still...

shogunblade said:
...the 3rd act reveal with Chloe Grace Moretz is not funny, Christopher Lee is used for two seconds and then dropped off on this movie, and having Jackie Earle Haley as the groundskeeper when he has since become a better actor in recent years kind of sat wrong with me. With an amazing Classic Rock Soundtrack being the most memorable to me...
I almost hate mentioning Chloe Grace Moretz out of fear of being lumped in with her perv following, but I was especially disappointed with the reveal. It was lame, and I didn't think her part overall put any of her considerable talent to use. I've got the same under-utilization complaint with Jackie Earle Haley.

...but that soundtrack. Damn!