$2.50 Reviews: Gladiator (2000)

Recommended Videos

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.335353-2-50-Reviews-Sleeping-Beauty-2011>Sleeping BeautyNext Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.335644-2-50-Reviews-The-Killer-Inside-Me-2010>The Killer Inside Me
$2.50 Reviews:
Gladiator
http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/poste201.jpg

Gladiator is an example of a film that doesn't do anything special, but pretty much everything it does feature is done well. You've seen almost all of this movie in other movies before -- it's definitely missing something to make itself unique and stand out from other similar films -- but it's worth watching just because it's well-made and rarely gets boring. Plus, winning the Best Picture Oscar for 2000 doesn't hurt.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="181" Caption="Lots of fights in this film." Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/77293-10.jpg[/Img_Inline]

We begin with a battle scene which I only hope wasn't supposed to inspire or make us care, because it didn't do that for me. Our setting is Ancient Rome, and this scene shows us how the Roman General named Maximus (Russell Crowe) is a pretty solid soldier and leader, as he gets his squad to win the battle against some German fellows. Maximus is then talked to by the current Caesar (Richard Harris). Seeing as how Harris' character believes that he is dying, he asks Maximus to take over the job once he departs from this world, despite having a son named Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix) who is eager to take the position.

Maximus is reluctant, although whether he would or would not accept the job doesn't matter, as Commodus kills his father in the middle of the night and gets the job thanks to being next in line for the title. This makes him the villain of the story, as he is a greedy character who also sentences Maximus to death for not shaking his hand. Being our hero, Maximus escapes, but ends up being captured and forced into the slave trade, which he took with good graces, never really complaining about it. I found that weird, but hey, he found out that his family was killed, so maybe he was suffering from depression -- something that wouldn't be diagnosed back then, nor would it anyway as he's now a slave. Too bad for him, I suppose.

Even though his squad won the battle in the first scene, there were a couple of times when he was knocked down and was almost killed; his squadron saved him in these situations. Once becoming a slave, he is forced to become a gladiator, someone who is forced ot fight in an arena, and is expected to die. As a gladiator, he becomes an unstoppable force, rarely even getting hit, and it never seemed like he could be killed.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="189" Caption="So many of these people I don't remember." Align="right"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/8699_t10.jpg[/Img_Inline]

The plot follows Maximus' attempts to get all the way back to the Colloseum and kill Commodus, effectively getting revenge for the betrayal that he and his family suffered. He meets some friends inside the gladiatorial arena, such as Juba (Djimon Hounsou) and Hagen (Ralf Möeller). Their purpose is largely to sit back and watch Maximus slay the people they've been sent to fight, as, after all, he is unstoppable.

Basically, it's a story about a man both wanting revenge, and also wanting to recover from the lowest point in his life. See, nothing you haven't seen before. But it's done well enough to keep it interesting, while also feeling somewhat fresh if you aren't sick of the Ancient Greece time period. It's not entertaining all the way through though, especially in the plots involving Commodus' sister, Lucilla (Connie Nielsen), who exists largely to pump up Maximus, which is something that I didn't think he needed anyway.

There's a fair bit more action in Gladiator than I thought there would be going in, although despite the choreography being fine, it does get dull after a while. It's just sword fight after sword fight here, with little deviation from that idea. Oh, there's also a fist fight too, but that comes late and is even less interesting. There needed to be more creativity here, or less action scenes in total, because it does become uninteresting after a while. Granted, I don't know how much more inventive you could get given the time frame, which is why skipping some of the lesser fights might have been a good idea.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="195" Caption="They get to fight, don't worry." Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/gladia11.jpg[/Img_Inline]

Russell Crowe makes a good soldier here, even if he did seem invincible at times. At one point, his shoulder is cut open, but despite the remarkable amount of blood he loses, the worst that happens is he blacks out for a bit. He doesn't seem to care about what blood loss does to a person, especially after he started to lose consciousness, and then realized that wouldn't be smart at the moments, so he picked up his pace. A later scene partially rectifies this issue, but even then, he still manages to fight a great deal before the blood loss catches up to him.

The best thing that Gladiator does is bring us into its setting and get us involved in the era. It sets a mood, a time period, and it sticks with it and makes it feel real. That's one of the things that has to be almost perfect, and Gladiator hits the nail on the head in this area. It's an immersive film, and it largely succeeds as a whole production because it encapsulates us so well.

Gladiator isn't anything special or unique, but what it does bring to the table is all well-done. There's not much wrong with it, even if its lead character seems far too unlikely to die, meaning that there's little-to-no tension during the often boring action scenes. But it sets a great mood and has a solid plot, which makes it a worthwhile watch, even if I don't think it was worthy of the 2000 Oscar for Best Picture.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
 

thelonewolf266

New member
Nov 18, 2010
708
0
0
I've got to disagree with you on this one though that doesn't mean I think its a bad review but Gladiator is one of my favourite films to date.Though your opinion of this film did spur me to post so that's a win for you.
 

BlueInkAlchemist

Ridiculously Awesome
Jun 4, 2008
2,231
0
0
Marter said:
t sets a great mood and has a solid plot, which makes it a worthwhile watch, even if I don't think it was worthy of the 2000 Oscar for Best Picture.


I think what made it Oscar-worthy was the way in which it was told. It is earnest, uncontrived and direct in its storytelling, while being neither terribly heavy-handed nor needlessly obscure. The acting and dialog are presented quite well, even if the plot, as you pointed out, is pretty standard Campbellian fare.

That said, this is a favorite of mine. If you want more stories from this period, which are both more interesting and more historically accurate (give or take), check out the HBO/BBC series Rome. You can thank me later.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,585
0
0
Well I imagine being a roman soldier and general gives you maybe just a Slight edge in a pit where you fight to the death against slaves, thieves, and rapscallions. Though he handles those animals rather suspiciously well I will admit.

hoesntly, I thought gladiator should have just kinda stuck to more action. it always seemed dull when Commodus started talking and we had to go and learn soem story. maybe thats just me though, and i've been known to dislike good movies for less reasons.
 

Cain_Zeros

New member
Nov 13, 2009
1,494
0
0
BlueInkAlchemist said:
If you want more stories from this period, which are both more interesting and more historically accurate (give or take), check out the HBO/BBC series Rome. You can thank me later.
Great series, that.

Anyway, on the topic of the review, I have a question. Did you watch the extended cut, or the regular one?
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
Cain_Zeros said:
Anyway, on the topic of the review, I have a question. Did you watch the extended cut, or the regular one?
I watched the theatrical version. Never even seen a copy of the extended version for sale (not that I've looked that hard).
 

Levethian

New member
Nov 22, 2009
509
0
0
Largely agree. I loved the action as a kid, but it has soured on me.

Which film do you think deserved the 2000 Best Picture Oscar?
O Brother, Where Art Thou? Requiem for a Dream? Billy Elliot?

I think my preferred film from that year was American Psycho...

Marter said:
its lead character seems far too unlikely to die, meaning that there's little-to-no tension during the often boring action scenes.
A touch unfair? I can't recall any protagonists in action films who felt anything other than 'unlikely to die'. ;)
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
Levethian said:
Which film do you think deserved the 2000 Best Picture Oscar?
O Brother, Where Art Thou? Requiem for a Dream? Billy Elliot?

I think my preferred film from that year was American Psycho...
Well, I know it definitely wasn't American Psycho. I really, really didn't like it. :p

I would prefer Billy Elliot (or, perhaps, Unbreakable) over Gladiator, although 2000 wasn't exactly a strong year from the films I've seen from it. (Haven't seen O Brother, Where Art Thou? though.)
Marter said:
its lead character seems far too unlikely to die, meaning that there's little-to-no tension during the often boring action scenes.
A touch unfair? I can't recall any protagonists in action films who felt anything other than 'unlikely to die'. ;)
I can see that, although there's at least some tension during them in many films. I don't remember (and it's been 3 months since I watched it now, so forgive me if I'm omitting something) a time when there was even a chance for Gladiator-dude to die. He seemed too invincible, if you get what I'm saying. We should believe that he can be killed -- that he's human -- even if that doesn't happen.
 

Levethian

New member
Nov 22, 2009
509
0
0
Marter said:
Well, I know it definitely wasn't American Psycho. I really, really didn't like it. :p
Just read your review, and indeed, you really didn't :). It's turned out to be the only film of that year that I ever re-watch. Probably for the performance; Bale's insights and descent into madness.

Marter said:
He seemed too invincible, if you get what I'm saying. We should believe that he can be killed -- that he's human -- even if that doesn't happen.
Can't deny that. He was a badass. Cameron could have opted for an almightily depressing ending and have Commodus defeat him at the end, but that would have been cruel to an audience baying for the Emperor's blood. I think excitement from the action-scenes come more from their execution rather than our imaginings of possible outcomes, or from reveling in the bad-ass-ness of the heroes. There's nothing dirty about male empowerment fantasies :)

I still recall the Hector v Achilles fight from Troy and the first Neo vs Smith encounter. They were great scenes that distracted me from the realisation that there was only 1 way they were going to end.
 

Cain_Zeros

New member
Nov 13, 2009
1,494
0
0
Marter said:
Cain_Zeros said:
Anyway, on the topic of the review, I have a question. Did you watch the extended cut, or the regular one?
I watched the theatrical version. Never even seen a copy of the extended version for sale (not that I've looked that hard).
Yeah, I haven't really looked, I just know my dad has a copy. Not the best thing to start watching at 11:00 at night. Damn is that a long movie.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
Cain_Zeros said:
Yeah, I haven't really looked, I just know my dad has a copy. Not the best thing to start watching at 11:00 at night. Damn is that a long movie.
However, it's definitely not the worst thing to watch that late either. I can think of worse things.

For example, on Wednesday morning, at 2:00AM, I decided it would be fun to watch Ghost Rider. You know, maybe it'll get better because I was fairly tired.

Nope.
 

Cain_Zeros

New member
Nov 13, 2009
1,494
0
0
Marter said:
Cain_Zeros said:
Yeah, I haven't really looked, I just know my dad has a copy. Not the best thing to start watching at 11:00 at night. Damn is that a long movie.
However, it's definitely not the worst thing to watch that late either. I can think of worse things.

For example, on Wednesday morning, at 2:00AM, I decided it would be fun to watch Ghost Rider. You know, maybe it'll get better because I was fairly tired.

Nope.
Well, yeah, bad is bad regardless. I don;t think sleep deprivation would make Napoleon Dynamite actually funny, for example.
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,461
0
0
I really loved the execution of this movie with the cinematography, soundtrack, and the feeling of actually being in the setting

 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,862
0
0
I just like Gladiator because it helped pave the way for all the other epic historical/fantasy/war movies in the following years such as Lord of the Rings, 300, Troy, Hero, King Arthur, The Last Samurai, Mongol and Kingdom of Heaven.