$2.50 Reviews: Predators (2010)

Recommended Videos

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.307923-2-50-Reviews-Predator-2-1990>Predator 2Next Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.308288-2-50-Reviews-Alien-vs-Predator-2004>Alien vs. Predator
$2.50 Reviews:
Predators
http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/poster68.jpg

Predators is a closer sequel in both nature, tone and setting to the original Predator film than Predator 2, and eventually plays out almost exactly like it, save for the fact that a few more people make it past the halfway point, and that there is no turnaround by a human character trying to hunt one of the aliens of the title. Apart from that, this film and the first one are one in the same, which may actually be its main problem.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="177" Caption="This was a fun scene." Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/10061810.jpg[/Img_Inline]

The film opens with a man falling from the sky. He turns out to be a slightly more muscular version of Adrien Brody named Royce, who speaks in a deep voice, seemingly trying to make us think that he's an action star. He pulls his parachute and lands in a jungle, and beside him land a few other people, some of whom try to kill him, but nobody dies yet. Danny Trejo, Topher Grace, Alice Braga, Oleg Taktarov, Walton Goggins, and Mahershalalhashbaz Ali end up falling close to him, and they decide to team up and fund out just what's going on here.

The thing is, they're all bad people, which is probably why they were picked. Or so they believe. They're all murderers or people who have violated some other law. One is a Yakuza member, one is on death row, and one is a doctor. The doctor doesn't seem to belong with them, and therefore doesn't get a gun or get to do any of the fighting. They eventually discover that they're not on Earth, but have instead been dropped off on a planet where the sun doesn't move, and seems to entirely jungle. This is a good setting, as the first Predator film proved, so at least we'll get decent action scenes.

As we know from the title, this planet will contain predators, the creatures from the first two Predator films. We know that they exist, whether from the title alone or because of the advertisements. It turns out, that our heroes have been dropped off as wild game for these creatures, because, as we've learned before, they enjoy a good hunt. Most of the film deals with the humans attempting to both kill and escape from the predators, all while hoping that they won't begin backstabbing one another.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="177" Caption="Here's most of our cast." Align="right"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/mwc-2010.jpg[/Img_Inline]

What this leads to is a film almost exactly like the first film, except more than 2 characters make it past the first half after the predators start going to town on them. Then the killing really starts to pick up, leading to many deaths in a short time period. If you can already guess just by the actors I listed, I wouldn't be all that surprised. If not, well, once the killings begin, you will no longer be surprised given how much screen time everyone is given. The only surprise in this film is the very first person killed, and all I have to say about that is that it was a serious miscalculation, because this person is talented and probably would have made the rest of the film better with his pretense.

Resulting from this premise are a bunch of action scenes, (mostly gunfights), and a couple of hand-to-hand combat sequences. The only truly entertaining part is one where a character fights a predator with a sword, only because we get to see how well these creatures can do when the human is armed, but not with a gun (for a change). But this scene ends too quickly, just like most of the other ones in the film. There's little filler, which is good, but I feel like the action scenes were trimmed down too much from what they could have been. They are simply too short to make much of an impact either as entertainment or a component to the story.

However, it becomes clear that this premise is just there so that the predators have some people to kill for a couple of hours. That's fine, but it's not very interesting after it happens over and over again. Sure, the characters do try to escape and fight back, but we've seen how strong these predators can be. In the first two films, two predators took out at least two-dozen people, if not more. Imagine now, what a whole group of them could do.

[Img_Inline width="275" height="170" Caption="Shoot!" Align="left"]http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/09/70/40/predat11.jpg[/Img_Inline]

Apart from the first death in Predators, you're going to figure out how all of the scenes are going to play out rather quickly. As soon as one get a couple of moments deep, you're going to realize what's going to happen, and as a result not find the film all that entertaining. Explosions and gunfire can only sustain so much energy, and when you know how the firefight is going to end, that energy drains rapidly.

At the very least, this is the first Predator film that had unique characters both in their appearance (they're not all just macho men with army suits) and in their personality. This helps differentiate them, although it doesn't make us care that they're pigs to the slaughter. However, I will make note that for a bunch of people who are supposed to be representative of the world's worst people, they're surprisingly nice and well-mannered.

Predators ends up being better than the second film in this series, but slightly worse than the first, if only because it's more or less the same film. The set-up is similar, and while the characters are better, there's not a lot to keep you entertained. It's an okay action film, but not one you actively need to seek out, unless you want to watch the first Predator with a more diverse cast, and with much less build-up.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
 

ImSkeletor

New member
Feb 6, 2010
1,472
0
0
I was surprised when that character died so early. I also really enjoyed the character of Stans(The Convict). He was really funny in a dark comedy type of way.

I liked this movie enough that I would watch a sequel in the theater, but im not sure if ill see it again anytime soon.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,834
0
0
I personally enjoyed this one enough to see it with a friend for a second time in theaters. It's probably because I liked it better than the original :p
 

BlueInkAlchemist

Ridiculously Awesome
Jun 4, 2008
2,231
0
0
To reiterate what I've said previously [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.266972-IT-CAME-FROM-NETFLIX-Predators] this is a B-movie. It's unapologetic about being a B-movie, but it's a damn fine B-movie.

This is, as always, a damn fine review, as well.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,971
5,850
118
This movie doesn't carve out its own identity. It references the first movie so much you can turn it into a drinking game. It's basically the first movie without Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jesse Ventura, Bill Duke, Carl Weathers, and Sonny Landham.

And I don't know if anyone else noticed, but the Predators in this movie move like sluggish ogres. Probably because the actors playing them are wearing heavy bodysuits which don't grant much mobility. The first film however found a way around this with clever editing and trickery, making the Predator come across as agile and athletic as it does.

And the only interesting concept this movie had going for it was nipped in the bud within the first few minutes it's introduced (Laurence Fishburne).
 

Spitfire

New member
Dec 27, 2008
471
0
0
Predators was a disappointment for me.

The writing was absolutely atrocious. It's not like the original Predator was some highly intellectual movie, but at least the characters had personality and were fun, and the dialogue was instantly memorable, neither of which can be said here.
In Predators, each of the characters is supposed to be some form of cliche badass, something that might have come across better, if only the characters weren't so fucking insipid. There are almost no distinguishing traits to any of them, in terms of personality, aside from the doctor, and Laurence Fishburne's character. This is only made worse by the fact that you can tell who will live and who will die right from the start of the movie, so you're not even going to be surprised when someone gets their skull repurposed as a teacup.

Don't even get me started on the dialogue, particularly the one-liners in this movie. Fuck, they're so uninspired, that the writers of the original movie could practically sue Robert Rodriguez for plagiarism. And the delivery of the lines is so wooden, that I can't believe that any filmmaker, let alone someone of Rodriguez's supposed status, could think that was good acting.

Also, a noteworthy fact about this movie is that it was marketed as the "true" sequel to the original Predator, denying the horrible Alien vs. Predator movies, but also Predator 2, weirdly enough. Not that Predator 2 was some untouchable masterpiece, but for the creators of Predators to claim that their movie was the only one deserving to be called sequel was a huge dick move, especially given the quality of their movie, or rather, the lack thereof.

I don't know what happened to this movie. It had a concept that sounded like it could make for a really fun experience, though unfortunately, it was anything but.