Take-Two CEO: "Exclusivity Does Work"

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Take-Two CEO: "Exclusivity Does Work"



Think that this generation marks the end of the Exclusive Era? Think again. Take-Two CEO Ben Feder thinks that there are still advantages to publishing exclusive titles mid-console cycle.

Speaking with Gamespot [http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6211640/take-two-grooming-agent-to-be-the-next-gta], Feder said that the publisher was grooming the upcoming PS3-exclusive Agent - in development by Rockstar North - to be for the PS3 what the studio's landmark Grand Theft Auto titles were for the PS2.

"We think this has the potential to be yet another great Rockstar North franchise title. ... It's the Houser Brothers and Rockstar North. It's the A team working on an AAA title. I think the subject matter, the characters, the story, the environment, the background--all the elements are there. It's such a rich environment to play in," said Feder.

Feder went on to explain the decision to make Agent exclusive for Sony's console, a choice that flies in the face of current trends. In the middle of a global economic downturn, sales are everything, and going exclusive limits the potential audience. To make matters worse, the PS3 is in last place worldwide by a fairly healthy margin, trailing competitor Microsoft by 22 million units sold to 30 million Xbox 360s - especially in the West, the traditional market for GTA style games.

That was something that Take-Two was well aware of, said Feder. "The trade-offs a publisher will typically make is, if you're platform-agnostic, you get a larger installed base." However, going exclusive has benefits of its own: "You're platform exclusive when you get the right kind of support from first parties."

With Sony's support, Feder thinks that Agent could be a worthy followup to last generation's tremendously popular Grand Theft Auto trilogy: Grand Theft Auto III, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, all of which were initially PS2 exclusives, and all three of which went on to become some of the best selling games of all time: "At this phase in the cycle, when you're trying to launch a new franchise, exclusivity can really help you launch the franchise. It can give you the kind of platform that you need to start exclusive, start in the right kind of way with the right kind of partner. Exclusivity does work."

Nor does Sony's last-place standing bother him - Feder thinks there's plenty of time left in the race for Sony to scramble back to the lead. "I have a lot of confidence in Sony. I have a lot of confidence in their ability to lead the market, as they always have," he said. "Their console is a terrific platform to be developing for, and Agent is a great testament as to our belief in what that platform can do, and what they can do with us as part of a partnership."

(Via Edge Online [http://www.edge-online.com/news/%E2%80%9Cexclusivity-does-work%E2%80%9D-says-take-two])

Permalink
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Whaaaat? SA was the best of the trilogy, mang.
 

isay

New member
Apr 15, 2009
62
0
0
If its more profitable for a developer then I guess that we don't really have any base to argue against it; however as a gamer I would love to see all games reach a wider market (and stop the curse that is fanboy-ism)
 

Eagle Est1986

That One Guy
Nov 21, 2007
1,976
0
0
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna be the equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Pretty sure the point was meant to be, that this game will do for the PS3 what GTA III did for the PS2. Which is quite a tall order if you ask me.
What's this game even about? I've heard enough about people complaining that Rockstar are going back to being Playstation exclusive developers but nothing about the actual game itself.
 

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
These are the same people who shipped the demo of bioshock with rootkit drm and then lied about it's existence.

PR monkeys spout bullshit, how's that even news by now?
 

bue519

New member
Oct 3, 2007
913
0
0
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna be the equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Well, I don't remember the part where he said it was going to be San Andreas 2, he was just comparing their exclusivity. So you might want to add something to the conversation instead of just stating an opinion thats extremely off topic.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
CantFaketheFunk said:
To make matters worse, the PS3 is in last place worldwide by a fairly healthy margin, trailing competitor Microsoft by 22 million units sold to 30 million Xbox 360s - especially in the West, the traditional market for GTA style games.
that's over all sales, mostly coming from north america, in Japan and even Europe the 360 isn't selling as well. except for one or two odd weeks, 1 week of ps3 sales is a month of 360 sales. also those stats are considering the year head start the 360 had and the gap is getting smaller

the thing about exclusives is there are certain things one of the consoles can't do
 

bue519

New member
Oct 3, 2007
913
0
0
Psychosocial said:
bue519 said:
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna be the equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Well, I don't remember the part where he said it was going to be San Andreas 2, he was just comparing their exclusivity. So you might want to add something to the conversation instead of just stating an opinion thats extremely off topic.
He said it's gonna do what San Andreas did, which is a bad thing in my eyes, and in what way are you adding anything to the topic?

As one of my posts replies said, there's been like nothing said about this game, so it's hard to discuss it anyways.
But what did San Andreas do? Sell a lot of copies and make a lot of money. Just because you don't like the game doesn't mean that it wasn't good. Also if nothing has been released about the game and your already bad mouthing it? You yourself even admitted to that. Besides I'm sorry if I didn't read through your other replies but frankly I don't think that highly of you.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
cleverlymadeup said:
CantFaketheFunk said:
To make matters worse, the PS3 is in last place worldwide by a fairly healthy margin, trailing competitor Microsoft by 22 million units sold to 30 million Xbox 360s - especially in the West, the traditional market for GTA style games.
that's over all sales, mostly coming from north america, in Japan and even Europe the 360 isn't selling as well. except for one or two odd weeks, 1 week of ps3 sales is a month of 360 sales. also those stats are considering the year head start the 360 had and the gap is getting smaller

the thing about exclusives is there are certain things one of the consoles can't do
Yes, but where do GTA games traditionally sell the strongest? North America.

Also, sources on the "1 week of PS3 sales is a month of 360 sales"? Because IIRC, NPD numbers consistently show the PS3 behind the 360 on a month to month basis.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
CantFaketheFunk said:
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Whaaaat? SA was the best of the trilogy, mang.
I have to agree. It's the only one of the series I've ever really felt like playing extensively, the others were okay but SA is the only one that really drew me in.

As for the topic, I hate the idea of exclusitivity. People say that it creates competition between the consoles and between different games, meaning a better quality product and gaming experience all around. Personally I don't think that's true. Since each console is different, releasing games on different platforms will still be different even if the games are the same. Playing something on the Xbox 360 will be a totally different experience to playing the same game on the PS3, because the consoles are built differently and while one focuses on an all round enjoyable gaming atmosphere (the 360), the other focuses more on being a powerful system with good graphics (PS3). People who have one console will have chosen it because of the console itself rather than the games released exclusively for it, and then they'll play their games on that console. Exclusive games aren't and haven't ever been enough to make me, or indeed anyone I know, buy a console simply for the sake of it. The only games I want to play on the PS3, for instance, are Heavy Rain and Arkham Asylum (if only for the Joker levels that aren't on the 360 version). I wouldn't buy a PS3 just for those though. By developing console exclusive games firms basically alienate large proportions of the gaming community who aren't willing to spend money on a new console just for one game. This damages their own profit margins as well. Personally I think exclusitivity is going to end up causing more problems for the industry than it'll solve.
 

bue519

New member
Oct 3, 2007
913
0
0
Psychosocial said:
bue519 said:
Psychosocial said:
bue519 said:
Psychosocial said:
It's gonna be the equivalent of GTA: San Andreas?

Then I guess I won't be missing anything. Because San Andreas was horrible.
Well, I don't remember the part where he said it was going to be San Andreas 2, he was just comparing their exclusivity. So you might want to add something to the conversation instead of just stating an opinion thats extremely off topic.
He said it's gonna do what San Andreas did, which is a bad thing in my eyes, and in what way are you adding anything to the topic?

As one of my posts replies said, there's been like nothing said about this game, so it's hard to discuss it anyways.
But what did San Andreas do? Sell a lot of copies and make a lot of money. Just because you don't like the game doesn't mean that it wasn't good. Also if nothing has been released about the game and your already bad mouthing it? You yourself even admitted to that. Besides I'm sorry if I didn't read through your other replies but frankly I don't think that highly of you.
I'm saying that if it will be like San Andreas then I won't be missing out on anything. Do I look like I care about what you think of me? Not to sound like an ass, but I honestly don't give a shit.
But he doesn't even compare their gameplay or feel. Just how they were released so your argument just makes you look like an idiot.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
I'm already a ps3 owner but I'm still of the opinion that all these exclusive games are more of an insistence from PR reps who think it will move units even though it ends up disenfranchising others. I also feel that unless there's something that only one particular system is capable of, there shouldn't be exclusives. So unless this game is really so spectacular and filled with so much content that only the ps3 could process it and it would only fit on a BRdisc, it should also be available on the pc and 360. But then again, I'm a grownup; usually exclusivity goes the other way around and there's usually a lot of obnoxious gloating involved on gaming forums. SO I guess he's right, it does work.