Commentary on "Fire and Blood"

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
Commentary on "Fire and Blood"

The best conclusion any fanboy could wish for.

Read Full Article
 

MatsVS

Tea & Grief
Nov 9, 2009
423
0
0
Thank you for the thoughtful and contagiously giddy commentary throughout the season, Mr. Tito, I've greatly enjoyed it. I've yet to catch the final episode, knowing all too well the inevitable, inexplicable emptiness I'll feel once it's over and the credits roll. I'm sure I'll be better served by savouring it for when my mood is perfect, and I have a whole evening to properly absorb it.

Funny thing is, before this series started, I did not count myself a great Martin fan, having found the latest title lacking, but now my excitement has been ignited yet again, and I am eager to consume the newest title. Hopefully, it will be more focused than Feast and prove that Martin actually knows where he intends to take this jumbled narrative.
 

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
MatsVS said:
Thank you for the thoughtful and contagiously giddy commentary throughout the season, Mr. Tito, I've greatly enjoyed it. I've yet to catch the final episode, knowing all too well the inevitable, inexplicable emptiness I'll feel once it's over and the credits roll. I'm sure I'll be better served by savouring it for when my mood is perfect, and I have a whole evening to properly absorb it.

Funny thing is, before this series started, I did not count myself a great Martin fan, having found the latest title lacking, but now my excitement has been ignited yet again, and I am eager to consume the newest title. Hopefully, it will be more focused than Feast and prove that Martin actually knows where he intends to take this jumbled narrative.
Thanks, MatsVS, I've enjoyed writing it throughout the season. I was disappointed by Feast as well, I even thought that Robert Jordan's successor did a better job keeping my interest, which sounds like blasphemy but it was true.

Hopefully Dance will redeem Martin as much as this series has.

Greg
 

ThaBenMan

Mandalorian Buddha
Mar 6, 2008
3,682
0
0
Man, the season flew by. It was an amazing ride, though - HBO did an incredible job with the adaptation, staying true to the spirit of the books but also adding some great content and making it their own. Bravo, HBO, I can't wait for season 2, and hopefully seasons 3, 4, and 5 after that!

And I've really enjoyed reading these commentaries after each episode - it was great to read some interesting thoughts from a fellow fan of the books and show. Well done, Greg.

So, we have A Dance with Dragons to look forward to, and the DVD release. But it's still going to be a long wait for season 2...
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Odd. I assumed that the whole Daenerys/ Drogo thing would be way more graphic and awful in the books than in the TV series (I watched that part in the series first before delving into the books) but it seemed, to me, that the whole thing was somewhat less forceful in the books. There's the whole "No" part when they first have sex where in the books, where Dany was a lot less tentative whereas in the series she's on the verge of breaking down at the thought of getting raped right then in there, which was followed by the later stuff both in the book and the series where she basically swoons for the guy while at the same time she finds her strength.

I'm not sure if I misunderstood it, badly, or if somehow I'm missing the point made in the separate novella about her (Blood of the Dragon) that better explains her misadventures with the Dothraki.

Can anyone clear that up for me?
 

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
unabomberman said:
Odd. I assumed that the whole Daenerys/ Drogo thing would be way more graphic and awful in the books than in the TV series (I watched that part in the series first before delving into the books) but it seemed, to me, that the whole thing was somewhat less forceful in the books. There's the whole "No" part when they first have sex where in the books, where Dany was a lot less tentative whereas in the series she's on the verge of breaking down at the thought of getting raped right then in there, which was followed by the later stuff both in the book and the series where she basically swoons for the guy while at the same time she finds her strength.

I'm not sure if I misunderstood it, badly, or if somehow I'm missing the point made in the separate novella about her (Blood of the Dragon) that better explains her misadventures with the Dothraki.

Can anyone clear that up for me?
Yeah, the Dany/Drogo relationship is a little muddy for me.

I thought Blood of the Dragon was just Dany's POV chapters from GOT bound together. Is that not the case? Is there more detail given?

Greg
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Greg Tito said:
unabomberman said:
Odd. I assumed that the whole Daenerys/ Drogo thing would be way more graphic and awful in the books than in the TV series (I watched that part in the series first before delving into the books) but it seemed, to me, that the whole thing was somewhat less forceful in the books. There's the whole "No" part when they first have sex where in the books, where Dany was a lot less tentative whereas in the series she's on the verge of breaking down at the thought of getting raped right then in there, which was followed by the later stuff both in the book and the series where she basically swoons for the guy while at the same time she finds her strength.

I'm not sure if I misunderstood it, badly, or if somehow I'm missing the point made in the separate novella about her (Blood of the Dragon) that better explains her misadventures with the Dothraki.

Can anyone clear that up for me?
Yeah, the Dany/Drogo relationship is a little muddy for me.

I thought Blood of the Dragon was just Dany's POV chapters from GOT bound together. Is that not the case? Is there more detail given?

Greg
The way I understand it, and I may be wrong, is that Blood of the Dragon is comprised of both the contents of the book with a little bit more content to flesh everything out, and that I may be forming an incomplete picture of the whole deal.

Why do I say that? I've read that a lot of people, especially females, tend to look at the TV adaptation in a way that makes it seem like it was somewhat sanitisized in that part, making Dany's experience less gruesome, but somehow I can't wrap it around my head just by seeing what was there in the written page. To me, it seemed as if it was made a bit more shocking than in the books.

Was it awful? Yeah, very, especially when considering Dany starts as a 13 year old tween, but the way I saw it, if only going by what I've read, is that Khal Drogo was a lot more tender to her in the beginning in the books than in the series. Especially during their first time together.
 

MajorDolphin

New member
Apr 26, 2011
295
0
0
This is why I hate television.. I find something I really like and watch it as often as I can and then the season ends and the long wait for the next one begins. Grr.

Feast for Crows is killing me. Why the author decided to forget about all the interesting characters and the interesting things they're doing is beyond me. Is it just me or does Martin rely far too much on story twists? He constantly builds up expectations only to go the completely opposite direction and it was old by book 3.
 

rickthetrick

New member
Jun 19, 2009
533
0
0
MajorDolphin said:
This is why I hate television.. I find something I really like and watch it as often as I can and then the season ends and the long wait for the next one begins. Grr.

Feast for Crows is killing me. Why the author decided to forget about all the interesting characters and the interesting things they're doing is beyond me. Is it just me or does Martin rely far too much on story twists? He constantly builds up expectations only to go the completely opposite direction and it was old by book 3.
Think waiting till spring is bad? Think about how long ago Feast came out. As for why it doesn't have all the characters. GRRM explains it as he wrote too much, and had to put out Half of his book. That doesn't really explain why it's taken forever and day for Dance to come out though.

OT: I'm looking forward to season two and three.
I have to wonder who they'll pick to play Briene of Tarth.
Here's hoping they keep her ugly :)
 

MajorDolphin

New member
Apr 26, 2011
295
0
0
rickthetrick said:
MajorDolphin said:
This is why I hate television.. I find something I really like and watch it as often as I can and then the season ends and the long wait for the next one begins. Grr.

Feast for Crows is killing me. Why the author decided to forget about all the interesting characters and the interesting things they're doing is beyond me. Is it just me or does Martin rely far too much on story twists? He constantly builds up expectations only to go the completely opposite direction and it was old by book 3.
Think waiting till spring is bad? Think about how long ago Feast came out. As for why it doesn't have all the characters. GRRM explains it as he wrote too much, and had to put out Half of his book. That doesn't really explain why it's taken forever and day for Dance to come out though.

OT: I'm looking forward to season two and three.
I have to wonder who they'll pick to play Briene of Tarth.
Here's hoping they keep her ugly :)
True. I was just looking at the release dates. I'll have to find something worth reading after I knock out Dragons.

( Is it just me or would this series make a great MMO. :D All the hints at long past times and kings almost lends itself to it )
 

Rashkavar

New member
Jun 20, 2011
6
0
0
From what I've heard (I'm a neophyte to the Song of Ice and Fire - I've only read Game of Thrones as yet), Martin made the same mistake in Book 4 that Robert Jordan did...in book 4. Character overexposure. Some viewpoint characters are dropped in book 4 and book 4's will be dropped in book 5 - they happen concurrently. Or so I've been told.

And to be fair, Brandon Sanderson is one of the best fantasy writers of the day. In the gap between deciding it was inevitable that Robert Jordan would die before Wheel of Time was completed and Sanderson being declared his successor, I feared it would be like reading the batch of Foundation books written after Asimov's death. He's a different sort of writer than Jordan or Martin, but still good.

For me, as a Sanderson fan, the agony is waiting for book 2 (and the remaining 8 or so) of the Stormlight Archive. He's been quoted as saying the project will take him 12 years, and, according to his website's progress logs, he's not even working on book 2 yet. That said, I can't blame him for prioritizing the last of the Wheel of Time books before going back to his own megaproject.

The TV buffs have it easy - they at least have guarenteed timelines. It's not uncommon for the megaproject book series to take nearly 2 years between installments, and I've heard of even longer waits. And to us rabid fans, each installment lasts 1-2 weeks, rather than the 10-26 of a "season."

And despite the parallels to Dune, the inspiration is the War of the Roses. Many of the major characters have direct parallels in history. Heck, when I was first reading Game of Thrones, my Dad was reading an in depth history of that time period, and several house and place names were quite comparable between the two. That said, there weren't any ice zombies (white walkers) or dragons involved in any part of the War of the Roses. Would've made history class in grade 9 more interesting, but sadly...
 

Lex Darko

New member
Aug 13, 2006
244
0
0
Noelveiga said:
By the way (spoilers for Dune and this), I would have been waaaaay more shocked at Ned's death (the use of misspelled common names in the show is one of the little things that annoy me) if I hadn't realized early on that this is just fantasy Dune.

I mean, a nobleman forced to go rule in a place he has no particular interest in? Suspiciously friendly allies that may or may not be setting up a trap? Betrayal from one of them out of left field? Friends and children left to escape by their own devices? A counterattack built out of a grassroots movement? Yeah, it's pretty close and not quite as original as people make it out to be. But still cool, don't get me wrong.
I don't know of any grass roots resistance movements in ASOIAF series other than maybe what Dany starts up in A Clash of King and A Storm of Swords; and even then she is still in the free cities far from Westeros.

Vary's and Baelish were never Stark's friends they are master manipulators.

I'm sorry I just don't see the parallels with Dune.

OT: I enjoyed the adaptation but can't help but feel like big chunks of the back/connecting stories are still missing.

For example think about how many times Lyanna's name is mentioned in the book compared to the show. By the end of AGoT you knew that Ned had promised Lyanna something more than just a burial plot under Winterfell; that sense of missing information conveyed by Ned's constant thoughts about the promise made to his dying sister is sorely absent from show.

Another example missing back story would be the speeches given to John Snow by Lord Mormont and Meister Aemon. Both of those were cut short for the show. For me it was those types of connecting threads that made the story really enjoyable and immersive but are missing in the TV series.

Then there are the missing dreams of the POV characters, and the forgone insights due to change in medium. I'm re-watching episode 10 now and from what's shown you would never guess that Catelyn blames herself for Ned's death; or that Dany had visions about the death of her son (and his would be destiny) while he was still in the womb.

On the other hand, they did do a fantastic job with most of the supporting characters especially Tywin Lannister. His introduction in episode 7 (You win or You Die) was perfect. And how they've built up the role of Theon Greyjoy was nicely done also, give his role as a POV character in A Clash of Kings.

With the books I had to look up on the wiki just who Theon was again by the time I started on A Clash of Kings, from you show you wouldn't know it but he really is only mentioned about 5 times in the entire book.

In the end I really do hope that get a better budget for Season 2 given the number of battles that happen and that fact that Dany almost always keeps at least one of the those Dragons with her at all times.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Noelveiga said:
Ok, this is freaking me out, now. Why does Greg Tito keep referring to the books as if they had actually happened and talking about "historical accuracy". At first, earlier in the season, I thought it was some sort of rethorical resource, but now it's seriously starting to come across as nerd delusions.

Anyway, yep, it was pretty cool. Not quite as cool as some made it out to be. It wasn't more shocking or detailed than Rome and, frankly, a lot of smaller threads didn't pay off. Sure, they *will*, but like I've said elsewhere, at that point we're in FFXIII's 40 hour tutorial territory.

By the way (spoilers for Dune and this), I would have been waaaaay more shocked at Ned's death (the use of misspelled common names in the show is one of the little things that annoy me) if I hadn't realized early on that this is just fantasy Dune.
"Historical accuracy" is used because they are researched and intended to be historically accurate to medieval customs. That's why. It's not some kind of "nerd delusion." That's just ignorance speaking on your part.

I mean, a nobleman forced to go rule in a place he has no particular interest in? Suspiciously friendly allies that may or may not be setting up a trap? Betrayal from one of them out of left field? Friends and children left to escape by their own devices? A counterattack built out of a grassroots movement? Yeah, it's pretty close and not quite as original as people make it out to be. But still cool, don't get me wrong.
Who have you been talking with, then? Nobody has been making it up to be as something groundbreaking and original as you were expecting it to be. Those particular plot strands, especially, have been around for thousands of years and you could fill the back of trucks with all kinds of different stories about the same thing. JRRM just does it exceptionally well, that's all.
 

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
unabomberman said:
Noelveiga said:
Ok, this is freaking me out, now. Why does Greg Tito keep referring to the books as if they had actually happened and talking about "historical accuracy". At first, earlier in the season, I thought it was some sort of rethorical resource, but now it's seriously starting to come across as nerd delusions.
"Historical accuracy" is used because they are researched and intended to be historically accurate to medieval customs. That's why. It's not some kind of "nerd delusion." That's just ignorance speaking on your part.
This. Fantasy is always stronger to me when it has real-world analogues, and Martin does that expertly. This is the reason I prefer playing D&D with rules that adhere to how humans actually lived in history, rather than supermen with super human powers at level one. And it's why Game of Thrones resonates with so many people, especially me.
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
I read the first few paragraphs and didn't spoil anything for myself.

But as a newcomer to the series, I said "Oh shit" each time I saw a new dragon. And I agree, they really did a great job with the special effects.

But we have to wait an entire year for the next season? Sadface maximum. Guess I now have a reason to read the books.

Come on Susan, I want my Recap.
 

snowfi6916

New member
Nov 22, 2010
336
0
0
I have not started reading the series yet, but after watching Season 1 I fully intend to.

Coming into watching the show I was a big LOTR fan, now I think I might be a Martin fan as well. I enjoy how he doesn't hold onto his main characters like Tolkien did...no "coming back to life" heroes here.

As a side note...DAMN YOU HBO FOR MAKING ME WAIT UNTIL NEXT SPRING TO SEE A NEW EPISODE!

Aw well, like I said, go to Barnes n Noble, buy the series(up to this point), then wait for Season 1 to come out on DVD.
 

the7ofswords

New member
Apr 9, 2009
197
0
0
Roz has some sort of magical power, have you noticed? As soon as she takes her clothes off, people around her just begin yammering on about all sorts of things. I move she be referred to henceforth as "Roz the Magical Exposition Whore."