UK Court Force Chokes George Lucas's Copyright Lawsuit

vansau

Mortician of Love
May 25, 2010
6,107
0
0
UK Court Force Chokes George Lucas's Copyright Lawsuit



George Lucas's $20 million lawsuit against the man who made stormtrooper helmets for the original Star Wars movies is over, and Lucas can't be happy with the results.

Andrew Ainsworth has spent over five years and £700,000 going up against George Lucas's lawyers, stuck in a bitter copyright battle with the movie mogul. However, the fight is finally over and Mr. Ainsworth has reason to celebrate: The U.K.'s Supreme Court has sided with him about his right replica Stormtrooper helmets.

If you haven't heard of Ainsworth before now, here's the Reader's Digest version of how this case came to be. The man was a 27-year-old art school graduate when he created the original helmets for the first Star Wars film. In 2002, he was struggling to pay off school costs, so he sold one of the original helmets and some "bits and pieces" that were collecting dust around his house. The gear sold for £60,000 at Christie's, which gave Ainsworth the idea to break out the original molds and start making/selling helmets to dedicated fans.

Unsurprisingly, Lucasfilm wasn't too happy when word of the helmet sales appeared, and that's when things got litigious:

Lucasfilm sued for $20m in 2004, arguing Mr Ainsworth did not hold the intellectual property rights and had no right to sell them - a point upheld by a US court.

But the judgement could not be enforced because the designer held no assets in the US, so the battle moved to the UK.

It turned out that no Lucas and Ainsworth never signed any paperwork, though the courts decided that there was an implied contract between the two men. However, the initial claim was rejected and the court battle centered around whether the helmets being sold were works of art or industrial props. If they were the former, then copyright protection would last for 70 years after the life of the author; the latter, though, only enjoys copyright protection for fifteen years after the date they were originally created and marketed.

The High Court and Court of Appeal ruled in Ainsworth's favor, and the Supreme Court just followed suit. While Ainsworth is undoubtedly thrilled -after all, he turns a pretty tidy profit on the helmets and sets of armor- Lucasfilm clearly is pretty angry. After the ruling, a spokesperson for the film stated, "We believe the imaginative characters, props, costumes, and other visual assets that go into making a film deserve protection in Britain. The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy."

What will be interesting to see is just how this will affect Lucasfilm's revenue. According to Ainsworth's lawyer, the legal decision "opens a 'Pandora's box' as anyone is now free to make the models."

Source: <a href=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12910683>BBC

Permalink
 

Orcboyphil

New member
Dec 25, 2008
223
0
0
Ahh diddums Lucas. Did you just loose your hottub filled with cash to match the olympic sized swimming pool! At last a copyright claim that is settled in the right persons favour.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
"We believe the imaginative characters, props, costumes, and other visual assets that go into making a film deserve protection in Britain. The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy.
Because it's so wrong for the guy who designed and made them originally to make money off of his own work.

What a load of crap, there is no "pandora's box" that's been opened by this case. The guy has a leg to stand on legally because he's the one who made the damn things in the first place. The situation would be completely different if it was Joe blow off the streets making the armor and turning a profit.

If there's a lesson to be learned here it's that a contract would have protected George Lucas' every growing mountain of money had he taken the time to write it up back in the 70's instead of just assuming he could rip off a struggling 27 year old art student.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
Nice slippery slope argument Lucas has going. Too bad UK's judges didn't buy it.
 

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
KeyMaster45 said:
"We believe the imaginative characters, props, costumes, and other visual assets that go into making a film deserve protection in Britain. The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy.
Because it's so wrong for the guy who designed and made them originally to make money off of his own work.
He didn't rip him off, and yes the guy did originally make them, the answer to both points however is that the guy was contracted to make these things. That said, Lucas should have drafted a contract 30 years ago and it wouldn't have killed him to actually offer to pay this guy to close this loophole before it became public/grew larger. He has the resources one would think to have made a generous offer.

canadamus_prime said:
Why not just grant the guy exclusive licensing rights to distribute the stuff in the UK, then?
A beautiful idea for how lucas could have amicably settled this with a little more flexible thinking.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
vansau said:
"We believe the imaginative characters, props, costumes, and other visual assets that go into making a film deserve protection in Britain. The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy."
Well then Lucas, you should have followed up with the proper paperwork establishing the props as official industrial props. You fail at just taking things for granted as well as treating your contributors as shit. Considering what the original movies brought in, it is a travesty this guy wasn't paid enough in the first place to pay off his school costs.

Better move would have been giving the guy recognition for his hard work. Now Lucasfilm just looks like the big bully all over again, who now is a big loser as well.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
hold on, what's this doing in featured content? isn't it news?
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
KeyMaster45 said:
What a load of crap, there is no "pandora's box" that's been opened by this case. The guy has a leg to stand on legally because he's the one who made the damn things in the first place. The situation would be completely different if it was Joe blow off the streets making the armor and turning a profit.
Nope. He won the case because the helmets and armour were ruled to be industrial props, which only get 15 years of IP law protection. That means anyone with the skill to make them can start turning them out... in the UK anyway.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
While I abhor piracy, this is a case of the auteur or maybe the auter's lawyers getting "to big for their boots".

If they and Lucas had won, what next? people getting sued for the use of the word "Star"?

On a serious note, hardcore Star Wars fans will go to this guy for authentic costumes, he should be applauded Lucas (and Lucas Lawyer missiles) not chided because he's given fans an outlet for there hobby, this stuff is original and made from the mold as it were.

Come on Lucas, make some stormtrooper outfits yourself, lets see how you measure up?
 

ramboondiea

New member
Oct 11, 2010
1,055
0
0
that bit about the british courts becoming a haven for piracy really rubbed me the wrong way when i first read it, in fact a lot of the things lucasfilm's lawyers said pissed me off.

we have a legitimate system and if lucasfilms ad followed proper procedure when they first hired the guy there would have been no problem.

lastly, there is no pandoras box here, this was already an established piece of legislation, in fact if the decisions would have had disastrous consequences, then the courts wouldnt have ruled against lucasfilms because in those situations, the courts weight up the potential flood gate of problems there rulings will have, against the rights of the parties, and if they deem the decision would have massive repercussions, they would rule against it
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
KeyMaster45 said:
"We believe the imaginative characters, props, costumes, and other visual assets that go into making a film deserve protection in Britain. The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy.
Because it's so wrong for the guy who designed and made them originally to make money off of his own work.

What a load of crap, there is no "pandora's box" that's been opened by this case. The guy has a leg to stand on legally because he's the one who made the damn things in the first place. The situation would be completely different if it was Joe blow off the streets making the armor and turning a profit.

If there's a lesson to be learned here it's that a contract would have protected George Lucas' every growing mountain of money had he taken the time to write it up back in the 70's instead of just assuming he could rip off a struggling 27 year old art student.
While I agree the artist should've won this case, it DOES open a can of worms, as the ruling means that anyone in the UK can make them. I'm not quite sure how you'd go about sealing up that can of worms, as I think it should be limited to Lucas Arts and the Artist making them, otherwise now any shmuck can make them and not be in infringement of copy write (and as much as I think George Lucas is a hack these days) and that just isn't right, as it does technically cut into the artists theoretical IP rights of the Storm Troopers physical look. While it now official has no IP protection, it was still his idea, and he's won...but at a cost, if you catch my drift.
 

minimacker

New member
Apr 20, 2010
637
0
0
"The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy."

Because a lifetime + 70 years of copyright is cool.
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
minimacker said:
"The UK should not allow itself to become a safe haven for piracy."

Because a lifetime + 70 years of copyright is cool.

Yes, especially when the creator is a corporation... which, when you take Work for Hire and Commissioned Works IP into account, is more common than people might think.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
ColdStorage said:
If they and Lucas had won, what next? people getting sued for the use of the word "Star"
Or next thing you know, Edge Games will be suing people for using the word "<link=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/104152-Court-to-Cancel-Tim-Langdells-Edge-Trademarks>Edge"!
..wait a minute...
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
jamiedf said:
lastly, there is no pandoras box here, this was already an established piece of legislation, in fact if the decisions would have had disastrous consequences, then the courts wouldnt have ruled against lucasfilms because in those situations, the courts weight up the potential flood gate of problems there rulings will have, against the rights of the parties, and if they deem the decision would have massive repercussions, they would rule against it
Well there goes my dreams of moving to the UK and starting a business making movie prop knock offs. :D
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
Just lost a lot of respect for George Lucas. Instead of suing the guy he should have given him licensing rights to create and distribute the suits in exchange for a percentage of the profits, I bet Ainsworth wouldn't have said no to that and Lucas would have been in a better position right now.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
(I think there is only one way to describe how I feel about Lucas getting pwnded with Star Wars)



"YEEE HAAAA!!! Great shot, kid. That was one in a million!"

Here, this is for you:


Remember Andrew, the Force will be with you... always.

[/nerd mode]