Legal Hurdles Foil Mass Effect 3 "Space Edition" Lottery - UPDATED

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Legal Hurdles Foil Mass Effect 3 "Space Edition" Lottery - UPDATED


A plan to raffle off a "space edition" of Mass Effect 3 and donate some of the money to Child's Play has been called off after the owners learned that the idea was totally, seriously illegal.

The copies of Mass Effect 3 Child's Play [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/115885-EA-Launches-Mass-Effect-3-Discs-into-Space] and the rest to help fund a new videogame company.

It seems like a pretty solid idea to me but as Law of the Game [http://kotaku.com/5888619/early-mass-effect-3-winners-may-have-jumped-into-legal-hot-water] blog, it contravenes a lot of laws, beginning with a Nevada law stating that such things are legal only if all money raised goes to charity.

"You can pretty much never rely on a charitable gaming exemption unless 100 percent of the money goes to a charity [though you can often use part of the funds to cover event costs, ie. dealers at a charity casino night]," Methenitis said. "Diverting the funds here is about as clear cut as you can get; they're using the funds for personal gain."

Furthermore, the duo made the mistake of promoting the draw on YouTube [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgnY6GoMt8I&feature=youtu.be], which exposes them to federal penalties as well. And this isn't just slap-on-the-wrist stuff, either. "It's often a felony, which usually means something like 1-10 years in prison and/or a fine [usually in the thousands to tens of thousands range]," Methenitis added.

Faced with the ugly reality of the law, they first decided to give all proceeds to Child's Play before ultimately pulling the plug on the whole thing. "As of now we are officially canceling this entire thing, and refunding everyone's money through PayPal," Droz said in a statement. "Sorry about that, we should have done our homework first, but in the rush to get this done, hopefully do something cool for charity and get ourselves a kickstart to start our company, we just didn't do our due diligence. Again, we super apologize for wasting anyone's time."

It's an unfortunate end to a nice idea, but I suppose nothing is stopping them from taking their chances on eBay and then doing whatever they want with the money. Ain't the law grand?

UPDATE: Based on the response I've seen here and elsewhere, I don't think too many people see this mini-mess as anything more than a good idea that took a bad turn, but to ensure that nobody has the wrong idea about their intentions, Miguel Droz [by way of Ryan Neal] sent us the following statement:

"Hey guys, I'm the Droz from the article. I wish I could blame it on something else (it was the desert madness! I swear) but the truth is we made a rushed decision based more on excitement than stopping and considering common sense. This wasn't completely thought through, but was done with 100% honest intentions. In our excitement and enthusiasm to get our video online as soon as possible we just never stopped to think about the potential negative outcomes.

Our love for social media just took over our brains and honestly the least important thing to us was the money, we just believed it was a cool way to launch our company. What we were really hoping for was a mention on Kotaku (we just didn't realize the headline would be "Two Idiots Try Something Dumb")!

A representative of Child's Play wrote us a very kind e-mail, and provided us with links to rules and regulations and best practices when trying to do something like this in the future. We've also reached out to EA to assure them we have zero future intentions of profiting from their competition in any way, and that will will not be transferring/gifting/giving/providing this copy of the game to any other party due to the unfortunate massive legalities.

We do however super appreciate (yes, Joystiq, we really talk that way) the very kind words and support we've received from the people who did donate, and the patience and understanding of everyone who donated when it came to getting a refund and the contest being cancelled. We also have very real intentions of starting this video game company (but will be heavily Googling the potential legal troubles of any event we try in the future). So if you're at all interested in seeing how that works out, friend us on FaceBook, follow us on Twitter or subscribe to our YouTube channel for future announcements on our products to be released and fully sanctioned contests and fundraisers. We're not that bad of guys if you get to know us. :)"

(photo [http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/q5lz2/so_my_cousin_found_something_out_in_the_arizona/c3uyztb])


Permalink
 

Qitz

New member
Mar 6, 2011
1,276
0
0
That'll teach those greedy bastards to try and do something nice like donate some money to a charity!

Also, stuff is illegal in Nevada? Bwaaah?
 

shado_temple

New member
Oct 20, 2010
438
0
0
Qitz said:
That'll teach those greedy bastards to try and do something nice like donate some money to a charity!

Also, stuff is illegal in Nevada? Bwaaah?
The trick with this story is that they attempted to host a raffle where a majority of the proceeds went to the creators of the raffle, without consent from the state in a form of a license (which are considerably difficult to obtain). If it's hard to imagine why this is a law, think about it from the other side: two young men are asking people for unlimited (read: any amount of money in $5 intervals) dollars for a chance of winning an early copy of a game, whose existence was never proved in the first place. The only promise these two men made was that some percentage of this money would eventually go to charity.

EDIT: Fixed to reflect the fact that an amount going to charity had been specified.
 

IckleMissMayhem

New member
Oct 18, 2009
939
0
0
I'd have thought there'd be something in the rules of the competition to stop people selling, or otherwise passing on the copies of the game they found...

Seems like they wouldn't have been in any trouble if all the money would have been given to charity, instead of keeping two thirds of it for themselves.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
shado_temple said:
Qitz said:
That'll teach those greedy bastards to try and do something nice like donate some money to a charity!

Also, stuff is illegal in Nevada? Bwaaah?
The trick with this story is that they attempted to host a raffle where an unspecified portion of the proceeds went to the creators of the raffle, without consent from the state in a form of a license (which are considerably difficult to obtain). If it's hard to imagine why this is a law, think about it from the other side: two young men are asking people for unlimited (read: any amount of money in $5 intervals) dollars for a chance of winning an early copy of a game, whose existence was never proved in the first place. The only promise these two men made was that some percentage of this money would eventually go to charity.
Read the part where it says 33 percent. It was in fact specified.

This is a shame, for once they had a decent marketing stunt which didn't insult anyone and there would be a charity aspect of it. Well, at least they tried.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
This is pretty funny since Charities can take up to like 60% of the profits they raised for whatever they want, but I guess what they're doing is terrible too.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Haha, you aren't allowed to keep 66% of a game raffle but 99% of everything the red cross brings in is used by the red cross.

Haha, here it is: It's just easier to sell the copy for big money and give none of it to charity. That is government at work folks.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
Snotnarok said:
This is pretty funny since Charities can take up to like 60% of the profits they raised for whatever they want, but I guess what they're doing is terrible too.
Is that in the U.S.? I know in Canada that only 25% of charity profits need to be actually used and everything else can be used for payroll and costs, learned that while working for World Vision and Plan Canada.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Blind Sight said:
Snotnarok said:
This is pretty funny since Charities can take up to like 60% of the profits they raised for whatever they want, but I guess what they're doing is terrible too.
Is that in the U.S.? I know in Canada that only 25% of charity profits need to be actually used and everything else can be used for payroll and costs, learned that while working for World Vision and Plan Canada.
I have to confess I don't know the exact percentage, however I was told it's something disgusting like that, I'll have to ask my sister (who's involved in a lot of non profit stuff).
 

willsham45

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,130
0
0
Talk about making the crimb fit the punishment. You would get less time for stealing stuff or beating someone up. Some laws are fucked up.
 

Mike Droz

New member
Feb 29, 2012
1
0
0
Hey guys, I'm the potential negative outcomes [http://www.facebook.com/Droz82].

Our love for social media just took over our brains and honestly the least important thing to us was the money, we just believed it was a cool way to launch our company. What we were really hoping for was a mention on Kotaku [http://kotaku.com/5888619/early-mass-effect-3-winners-may-have-jumped-into-legal-hot-water?tag=masseffect] (we just didn't realize the headline would be "Two Idiots Try Something Dumb")!

A representative of EA [http://www.childsplaycharity.org/] to assure them we have zero future intentions of profiting from their competition in any way, and that will will not be transferring/gifting/giving/providing this copy of the game to any other party due to the unfortunate massive legalities.

We do however super appreciate (yes, YouTube [http://www.joystiq.com/] channel for future announcements on our products to be released and fully sanctioned contests and fundraisers. We're not that bad of guys if you get to know us.
 

TophatEmperor

Regular Member
Feb 12, 2012
46
0
11
i am still waiting for one of them to land in a African Tribe and they began Worshiping Mass Effect 3...

ALL HAIL COMMANDER SHEPARD!! MAY HE PROTECT (insert Tribe name here) FROM THE REAPERS!!!
 

The Pinray

New member
Jul 21, 2011
775
0
0
What a shame, those two seemed like decent-enough chaps. So it's an all or nothing sort of deal? Sucks.
 

spectrenihlus

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,918
0
0
FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST THESE LAWS ARE STUPID!! Why should the state tell me how I wish to spend my money, if I want to put my money into a raffle for the chance of winning a product I should have the right. Why the government has to be involved is beyond me.
 

Right Hook

New member
May 29, 2011
947
0
0
That's too bad, personally I would have went ahead with the charity anyway, giving all the proceeds away, kinda lame on their part to just give up after they got people excited simply because they didn't stand to gain anymore, kinda selfish.
 

ThunderCavalier

New member
Nov 21, 2009
1,475
0
0
A shame. I'd like to see what these guys would do with their new video game company, and, of course, there would still be some compensation to a charity, which is always a good thing in my book.

Plus, they were going to launch a copy of Mass Effect 3 into space. We could be educating aliens of the greatness of Mass Effect this way! (Or we could possibly make every alien xenophobic because they'll think we'll shoot them in the face with our thermal snipers.)
 

Beautiful End

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,755
0
0
Wow, of all things that could be illegal in Nevada...this is one of them. Seriously?

Mike Droz said:
I'm speaking on my behalf, but I think a lot of people would agree on this: No one thinks you're bad guys. What you did was very noble, so to speak, and you did it for a good cause. if the headline would have been "Two idiots attempt to sell mass Effect 3 copy in order to buy booze and naked women", then sure. That would be pretty dumb.

Either way, I think it's funny that out of all the people out there who could have found the game, you guys did. And you got your jumpstart, in a way. So...talk about serendipity.

I can totally relate to your cause. As a 24 year old less than a year away from graduation, I'll probably be trying to start, or join, a company. I probably would have done the same, although I gotta say the idea of donating money to a good cause would have never crossed my mind. Not because I'm a jerk, but because...it just wouldn't have crossed my mind.

You, sir(s), have gained a Facebook follower. Maybe we'll meet one day if we both end up being successful in this industry (Though you guys are like 20 steps ahead of me). Godspeed.