Conflict Minerals and the Game Industry: The Problem

Robert Rath

New member
Oct 8, 2010
522
0
0
Conflict Minerals and the Game Industry: The Problem

Our thirst for nifty gadgets is fueling a nonstop war in the Congo.

Read Full Article
 

Avayu

New member
Apr 15, 2009
345
0
0
This column kind of amazes me. In the six articles written, it covered just as many different subjects (while still feeling very coherent in the theme of how video games, and the industry behind them, interact with society, culture und politics). In all of them, the author seems very knowledgable on the subject. So I guess there has to be hell of a lot of research put into these.
Kudos to you, Mr. Rath!
 

Robert Rath

New member
Oct 8, 2010
522
0
0
Blablahb said:
Kind of pointless. What's the alternative? Not trading just means those people either starve to death unemployed, or join some pillagers or militias. The problem isn't in the trade itself, it's in the country where it's from. And there isn't an awfull lot we can do about it from the west, short of sending in an army to impose order and build something.
I'll be addressing that in next week's column--believe me, the difficulties of policing minerals on the ground hasn't escaped my attention, and just cutting off the DRC isn't an attractive option either. However, to cover the topic in any kind of depth I had to spend about 2.5k words defining the problem, which is over twice the length of the usual column on The Escapist, thus I split it into two parts.
 
Jan 12, 2012
2,114
0
0
Thank you so much for writing this, Mr. Rath. It's nice to see an excellent piece of journalism coming from the industry, rather than fluff.
Blablahb said:
Kind of pointless. What's the alternative? Not trading just means those people either starve to death unemployed, or join some pillagers or militias. The problem isn't in the trade itself, it's in the country where it's from. And there isn't an awfull lot we can do about it from the west, short of sending in an army to impose order and build something.
Which does not mean we give up. It means we need to educate the people on ways that they can resist exploitation, and empowering local NGO's (usually with money) to work with them. It's gonna be a messy business, but we can't wash our hands of the business while we still profit from them. Hopefully, next week's article will give some concrete ways we and our governments can help.
 

Sqrt(-1)

New member
Jul 12, 2012
26
0
0
Very nice article. It's good to see that this part of the industry is being brought to light. While the media focuses on the labor conditions in sweatshops, it seldom mentions the working conditions in the mining operations you mentioned, which deserve equal, if not more, attention.

This is a little off-topic, but it does remind me of Gina Rinehart. Her 'willing to work for $2 per day' is their 'no other option but to work for $2 per day.'
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Blablahb said:
Kind of pointless. What's the alternative? Not trading just means those people either starve to death unemployed, or join some pillagers or militias. The problem isn't in the trade itself, it's in the country where it's from. And there isn't an awfull lot we can do about it from the west, short of sending in an army to impose order and build something.
Why is it kind of pointless? to solve a problem it must first be addressed. To ignore it will mean the problem will always remain. Don't be so cynical. If you intend to buy an electrical item research the company first at www.rankabrand.org.
If we start spending our money with more sustainable companies, others might start taking notice and start following suit.

Good article, this has been needed addressing in the gaming community for a good while now. I've mentioned the horrendous environmental policies of Nintendo on here before, but no seemed bothered. Shame really since its everyone's responsibility to tell them to book their ideas up, and we have the most powerful tool to do that with, OUR WALLETS. There seems to be a pandemic of apathy though when it comes to these issues.
 

Mylinkay Asdara

Waiting watcher
Nov 28, 2010
934
0
0
For those interested in learning about the depth of colonial depravity under Belgium (which seems like such a nice, innocuous little country one would hardly suspect of such a criminal injustice) in the Congo and who aren't afraid of some heavy reading I recommend King Leopold's Ghost
 

braincore02

New member
Jan 14, 2008
293
0
0
Blablahb said:
Kind of pointless. What's the alternative? Not trading just means those people either starve to death unemployed, or join some pillagers or militias. The problem isn't in the trade itself, it's in the country where it's from. And there isn't an awfull lot we can do about it from the west, short of sending in an army to impose order and build something.
It's not pointless at all. In a world where we're using and abusing resources and people, yet many, if not most of us, are more concerned with BF3 vs COD, collecting all the Pokemon, or what console is better than what, etc, we need to be exposed to global realities. They may seem far away now, and they may be less pleasant to think about than our frivolous hobbies and interests, but if we don't wake up sooner than later issues like these may consume every society.

People need to stand up to abuse, but before that can happen, they need to know about it.

Good article.
 

Andrew_C

New member
Mar 1, 2011
460
0
0
Actually this is a bit of a non-issue. The electronics companies and smelters have already pretty much taken care of this in a surprisingly successful example of self-regulation. Very little Congolese Tantalum enters the supply chain in the West, and the proposed legislation can do nothing about less ethical far-eastern smelters. See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/29/sec_materials/ for details.
 

TheEndlessGrey

New member
Sep 28, 2009
120
0
0
Blablahb said:
Kind of pointless. What's the alternative? Not trading just means those people either starve to death unemployed, or join some pillagers or militias. The problem isn't in the trade itself, it's in the country where it's from. And there isn't an awfull lot we can do about it from the west, short of sending in an army to impose order and build something.
I must be the only one who doesn't immediately disagree with this. Let's say we somehow eliminate these minerals from the supply chain, and the mines are now worthless to the militias... what's to stop them from taking the miners and putting them to work out in a poppy field (or whatever plant they can grow in that environment)? Actually, I'd be surprised to find out they're not already involved with the drug trade in some way or another. I don't think the minerals are the source of the conflict or the brutality, that falls on the wealth they provide.

The distinction being that if the militias can no longer exploit the people to gather minerals for their profit, they will find some other way to exploit the people. Worst case scenario is we stop buying their minerals, and the militias cannot find any other way to profit off these people... well they don't need to be alive anymore, do they? It's a terrible situation, but the demand for the minerals is not the cause of it, it's the fact that the region is controlled by thugs and warlords rather than any "civilized" government. Strike too hard at the source of their wealth (and therefore the source of their power), and it will only get worse for the people as those in charge push even harder to remain in charge.
 

KingGolem

New member
Jun 16, 2009
388
0
0
I fail to see the issue here. What I took from the article was this: the exploitation of the Congolese people provides us with cheap minerals. Cheap minerals means cheaper electronics, which is nice. As this exploitation allows us to enjoy cheaper electronics, I must endorse it. Cheaper electronics is something that positively affects me, while the suffering of Africans is of no importance at all.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
The Congo, ladies and gentlemen: viable evidence that Adam Smith's "invisible hand" don't correct bupkus.

Thank you for the timely and informative article, Mr. Rath.
 

shiajun

New member
Jun 12, 2008
578
0
0
KingGolem said:
I fail to see the issue here. What I took from the article was this: the exploitation of the Congolese people provides us with cheap minerals. Cheap minerals means cheaper electronics, which is nice. As this exploitation allows us to enjoy cheaper electronics, I must endorse it. Cheaper electronics is something that positively affects me, while the suffering of Africans is of no importance at all.
I truly, truly hope that this is just obvious trolling. That disconnection from the world won't help you in the end. These kind of problems don't get self-contained. Out of mind, out of sight doesn't work here. Sooner or later it all comes back to you, as with environmental abuse (which is also a problem in this case). It's no so far fetched that some Congolese terrorist group may strike somewhere in your country arguing that the blind eye of people with your mentality has favored hell on earth on their families, and that you must pay.

Robert Cath, my hat to you. Yours are the most interesting articles I have ever read on a gaming site. Please, please keep up the good work.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Wow -- this is an amazing piece. It's something that, honestly, never even crossed my mind. We hear a lot about the problems surrounding diamonds, but rarely about others. And, man, when the exploitation is so invisible to us on this side of the ocean, it's so tempting to just ignore it entirely.

Thanks for putting this out there, and reminding me why I've always come to The Escapist for real gaming discussion.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
I look forward to the next section, in which solutions are discussed. People have a knee jerk reaction, both to sweatshops and to exploitative blood minerals, but the sad reality is that the locals workers (and militias exploiting them) have no better choice. Closing down their best sources of income won't keep them fed.
 

Imp_Emissary

Mages Rule, and Dragons Fly!
Legacy
May 2, 2011
2,315
1
43
Country
United States
Very well written. Reading this has left me felling numb.
Hope to see more.
 

KingGolem

New member
Jun 16, 2009
388
0
0
shiajun said:
I truly, truly hope that this is just obvious trolling. That disconnection from the world won't help you in the end. These kind of problems don't get self-contained. Out of mind, out of sight doesn't work here. Sooner or later it all comes back to you, as with environmental abuse (which is also a problem in this case). It's no so far fetched that some Congolese terrorist group may strike somewhere in your country arguing that the blind eye of people with your mentality has favored hell on earth on their families, and that you must pay.
I am always quite frustrated when people assume I am trolling. I assure you, that is my genuine stance on the issue. I can't see how it could possibly affect me. Will their mining procedures ruin the environment? Possibly. In AFRICA. I also reject the notion that the Congolese would strike at us, because that would mean they had stopped fighting each other. Nor do I believe that their problem will spread to the civilized world where we live. The problem in the Congo is that a bunch of ignorant barbarians discovered that they were rich, and set about fighting over it. We in the U.S.A. have plenty of resources of our own, but we don't have their problems. Our mining and business procedures have only become more equitable over time, not less.
 

Shadowsetzer

New member
Jul 15, 2010
173
0
0
KingGolem said:
I am always quite frustrated when people assume I am trolling. I assure you, that is my genuine stance on the issue. I can't see how it could possibly affect me. Will their mining procedures ruin the environment? Possibly. In AFRICA. I also reject the notion that the Congolese would strike at us, because that would mean they had stopped fighting each other. Nor do I believe that their problem will spread to the civilized world where we live. The problem in the Congo is that a bunch of ignorant barbarians discovered that they were rich, and set about fighting over it. We in the U.S.A. have plenty of resources of our own, but we don't have their problems. Our mining and business procedures have only become more equitable over time, not less.
Just because an issue doesn't directly affect you doesn't mean it's a non-issue. Ignore it if you like, but at least respect the people who acknowledge it by not demeaning their efforts. Some people would actually like to make the world a better place for everyone, not just themselves.