NASA Downplays "Earthshaking" Discovery on Mars

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
NASA Downplays "Earthshaking" Discovery on Mars


The space agency says that Curiosity Rover lead scientist John Grotzninger was perhaps a tad overexcited when he claimed that a recent discovery on the red planet will be "one for the history books."

John Grotzninger caused a bit of a stir last week with comments about a recent analysis of the Martian soil conducted by the Curiosity rover. NASA hasn't yet announced the results of the analysis, but Grotzninger implied that whatever the rover had found, it was big. "This data is gonna be one for the history books," he told NPR. "It's looking really good."

That led very naturally to all sorts of speculation about what might be happening on, or under, the surface of Mars. The presence of alien life, perhaps? Evidence of life at some point in the past? A buried Shadow ship? Alas, Grotzninger refused to spill the beans.

But now NASA is moving to downplay the cryptic tease and dial back the excitement. "It won't be earthshaking but it will be interesting. As for history books, the whole mission is for the history books," spokesman Guy Webster told Time. "John was excited about the quality and range of information coming in from SAM [Curiosity's Sample Analysis at Mars] during the day a reporter happened to be sitting in John's office last week. He has been similarly excited by results at other points during the mission so far."

The agency's concern may be stoked by an earlier Curiosity analysis of the Martian atmosphere that appeared to contain methane, which could suggest the presence of life, but that was later found to be a false positive. NASA has also been burned by similar over-excitement in the past: In 1996 it had to step back from an announcement of the presence of organic compounds in a Martian meteorite that suggested the possibility of life on the planet at one point in its history.

NASA will unveil Curiosity's findings, whatever they may be, on December 3.

Sources: Time [http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/nasa-says-mars-discovery-is-not-earthshaking-after-all-1115437]


Permalink
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
No shit.

Sure I'm excited about Curiosity (or any other space mission or similar scientific endeavor).

But anything "groundbreaking" always has to be taken with a grain of salt. Just like the "Superluminar" particle at CERN that supposedly flew faster than the speed of light. At CERN it was shown to be a timing error and with this Curiosity discovery it'll likely be something interesting for people who know what they're doing but at the same time a huge let-down for all the armchair-scientists out there.
 

Mahorfeus

New member
Feb 21, 2011
996
0
0
I've got my tinfoil hat on. Conspiracies ho!

In all seriousness, scientists who are passionate about their work tend to see things differently than us, so I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up being some thing rather acute.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Well if its not alien life, alien artifcts or a message from beyond the stars, then its bound to be something thoroughly dissapointing, assuming that was what you were looking for.
 

L34dP1LL

New member
Mar 6, 2010
195
0
0
THEY FOUND THE PROTHEAN RUINS!!!11!ELEVEN!!

But seriously, I guess that they could have found traces or evidence that suggest that there used to be life on mars. But nothing definitive.
 

Pinkamena

Stuck in a vortex of sexy horses
Jun 27, 2011
2,371
0
0
Called it! Scientists are often very compassionate about their field of study, and something that seems amazing to them might be a little more mundane for the average Joe. So when I read how excited he was about the data, I had to laugh a little at all the alien life theories :p
Nothing to see here folks, just an overly excited scientists that happened to be in the vicinity of a journalist.
 

Carrots_macduff

New member
Jul 13, 2011
232
0
0
"As for history books, the whole mission is for the history books"

perhaps im just be a paranoid conspiracy freak, but this sounds suspiciously like bs political doublespeak no?
 

Sean951

New member
Mar 30, 2011
650
0
0
Carrots_macduff said:
"As for history books, the whole mission is for the history books"

perhaps im just be a paranoid conspiracy freak, but this sounds suspiciously like bs political doublespeak no?
Well, lowering what is essentially a tank with a laser turret via a rocket boosted skycrane is already pretty historic.
 

Carrots_macduff

New member
Jul 13, 2011
232
0
0
Notsomuch said:
He's like NASA's very own Peter Molyneaux.
i hope you mean he is the opposite of Molyneux, because an ambiguous statement like "we've made an exciting discovery" is definitely not what Molyneux is so infamous for
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
Curiosity found a cat. Successfully disposed of. That's another one for the history books.

(alternate version: Curiosity found remains... of itself! Mind: blown.)
 

Zakarath

New member
Mar 23, 2009
1,244
0
0
Results not earthshaking? ...but I was betting that it had studied a martian earthquake...
 

Ukomba

New member
Oct 14, 2010
1,528
0
0
Zakarath said:
Results not earthshaking? ...but I was betting that it had studied a martian earthquake...
Well as Marsquake wouldn't shake earth, now would it?
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,721
0
0
PLEASE be the Mars Archives! Tell me Bioware are psychic about this stuff and that Mass Effect was a premonition of the future!