NASA Downplays "Earthshaking" Discovery on Mars

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Carrots_macduff said:
"As for history books, the whole mission is for the history books"

perhaps im just be a paranoid conspiracy freak, but this sounds suspiciously like bs political doublespeak no?
No, just plain PR talk.

Anywho, this reads as 'scientist get excited over something majority important to him, but mandate to 'average joe', and then NASA begin the damage containment'.

Like with the 'microbes' from the Mars rock they found. That said, I like science-type stuff, so I am curious as to what it could be. Sadly, I don't think it'll be 'ancient Mars microbes found', more likely 'water was here a week ago' or something.
 

Notsomuch

New member
Apr 22, 2009
239
0
0
Carrots_macduff said:
Notsomuch said:
He's like NASA's very own Peter Molyneaux.
i hope you mean he is the opposite of Molyneux, because an ambiguous statement like "we've made an exciting discovery" is definitely not what Molyneux is so infamous for
I hope when you said opposite you meant analogous, because even barring the incorrectness of the statement about him being an opposite, it was a joke so obvious I wont bother explaining. Hand in your badge and your keyboard Macduff, you're off the case.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Haha, what else could it be but a buries Shadow ship! Nice shout out to one of the best scifi shows ever made (IMO).

OT: We all get over zealous at times. This could be something huge but NASA and the government could be down playing it (or so says my inner conspiracy theorist).
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
So this is NASA's version of "Cool story bro?"

I am hoping for dinosaurs in space personally.
 

Robot Number V

New member
May 15, 2012
657
0
0
Carrots_macduff said:
"As for history books, the whole mission is for the history books"

perhaps im just be a paranoid conspiracy freak, but this sounds suspiciously like bs political doublespeak no?
Well yeah, of course it is. What does that have to do with conspiracies?

Personally, I'm betting they discovered that Mars' brown-to-red dirt ratio is 48.2% higher then expected.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
So, they have found something big, and it turns out it is so big that they cant tell us. smells like the UFO thing all over again.
 

Milanezi

New member
Mar 2, 2009
619
0
0
Hear me! Sooner or later that curiosity will find a portal into hell, but unlike Doom we don't have space marines to take care of the problem. We're so fucked! not
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,148
3,890
118
What, finding something really, really exciting but not telling anyone what it is turns out to be a bullshit PR stunt because people think NASA is a bit off a joke nowdays?

Pardon me while I don't faint with surprise.

Also, really not helping with the "we're not a joke" thing.
 

Starik20X6

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,685
0
0
At first I was thinking it was going to be something huge, like an underground lake or significant traces of microbial life. Now I'm thinking it's probably just a type of geological formation that only occurs under certain atmospheric conditions, thus showing that Mars once had a similar atmospheric makeup to Earth. Which is still pretty exciting, just not as earth-shattering as first implied. Either way, science!
 

Li Mu

New member
Oct 17, 2011
552
0
0
Lets face it; this is NASA we're talking about. If they found rocks made of compressed solidified methane this would be a BIG thing. Well, I guess that it would indeed be a big thing if they found that, but it's certainly not something your average Joe would find amazing.

What's "One for the history books" for NASA may not be of any major interest to the majority of people.
I bet the discovery is a rock.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Good to see then dial it down a little bit. Honestly, its the last thing Nasa needs is a huge hype letdown.