UK Government Investigates Ethics of Freemium Games

Cognimancer

Imperial Intelligence
Jun 13, 2012
1,906
0
0
UK Government Investigates Ethics of Freemium Games



In-app purchases that encourage kids to buy premium content might be breaking UK laws.

We've all heard the horror stories - an unsuspecting parent leaves their child alone with the tablet for two minutes, and when they come back the kid has spent the family fortune on power-ups and bonus outfits. Though adults can download a free game and resolve not to spend a dime of their paycheck on premium content, it's harder for kids to understand which levels they're allowed to play and which levels are off-limits. This has the UK's Office of Fair Trading concerned about the "fairness" of in-app purchases targeted at children. To that end, the Office has launched an investigation into whether children are being exploited by pressure to pay for addition content in "free to play" games.

The grounds of the investigation are the UK's Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, which protects children from "direct exhortations" to make a purchase or take action that will require a purchase. The OFT is also looking into whether freemium games are misleading or commercially aggressive, causing children or parents to buy or download the apps without understanding what they are (or more critically, are not) getting for their purchase.

The OFT has reached out to major companies behind free to play web and mobile games about the investigation. The Office also asks parents and consumer groups to let them know about any "potentially misleading or commercially aggressive practices" in freemium games. If these games are found to be using exploitative methods aimed at children, enforcement action may be taken.

"We are concerned that children and their parents could be subject to unfair pressure to purchase when they are playing games they thought we free, but which can actually run up substantial costs," says the OFT's Cavendish Elithorn. "The OFT is not seeking to ban in-game purchases, but the games industry must ensure it is complying with the relevant regulations so that children are protected."

The next steps of the investigation should be published by October. You can argue about where the blame lies in situations like these, but the numbers speak for themselves: currently, 80 of the 100 top-grossing Android apps are free-to-play with premium content, and 28% of UK children aged five to 15 own a smartphone (as cited by the OFT). With in-app purchases never a menu or two away from your bank account, it can be hard to keep an unknowing child away from that digital candy shop.

Source: Office of Fair Trading [http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2013/33-13#.UWgHULWsiSp]

Permalink
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
As an up standing Englishman, I have alot of quips with my goverment but when it comes to games, it seems they're fairly mature on the matter.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat šŸ
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,162
130
68
Country
šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§
Gender
ā™‚
Dr.Awkward said:
I never thought the term "save the whales" would go this far...
It took me a minute to work out what you meant but it was worth it, funniest post I've seen for ages!

OT: Seems fair, too many of those games are set up as traps for unsuspecting kids with ridiculously over-priced items. Hopefully the coalition government can enforce some strict standards of the industry.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Finally we get some attention on the matter, microtransactions are going more rampant every day and the devs are only now fully realizing no one is wise to their game.
 

PoolCleaningRobot

New member
Mar 18, 2012
1,237
0
0
This was why I didn't like Zanga. Not because I thought their games were bad and unoriginal but because they make most of their money by exploiting people who don't know better. I read in Game Informer that even though a huge amount of people played Zanga games like Farmville, only a tiny percent of them were will to spend money on the game. The thing is, those who spent money spent a lot of money every month which where most of Zanga's profits came from. Those could be kids or even mentally disabled adults who don't understand what they're getting
 

AstaresPanda

New member
Nov 5, 2009
441
0
0
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
 

Senare

New member
Aug 6, 2010
160
0
0
AstaresPanda said:
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
Blaming parents may just be shifting the blame. It is better to investigate thoroughly than to go for easy excuses, which goes for all parties.
 

Johnson McGee

New member
Nov 16, 2009
516
0
0
AstaresPanda said:
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
In many of these cases the kids managed to rack up thousands in charges despite parental restrictions on purchasing in the phone and the child being in the same room as the parent at the time. I don't think it's lazy parenting to let your child play games without looking over their shoulder the whole time.
 

Selva Hechicera

New member
Nov 12, 2012
1
0
0
Gee. Wouldn't it be awesome if we could have an investigation like that in the USA? To bad Reagan deleted our governments right to do anything of the sort during deregulation.
 

hickwarrior

a samurai... devil summoner?
Nov 7, 2007
429
0
0
AstaresPanda said:
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
But at one point, you should feel free to ignore the child and let it do whatever it wants without worry. I mean, you do want to take a break from having to care for it right?

Besides that, this is quite new for most people, especially the ones that never pay attention to gaming media, where this is a well known thing.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
JoJo said:
Dr.Awkward said:
I never thought the term "save the whales" would go this far...
It took me a minute to work out what you meant but it was worth it, funniest post I've seen for ages!
....

Psst...

....

I don't get it. What whales?

OT: I can see an issue if kids can buy the in-app items without needing parental permission, passwords, or credit card info. If they can just do it, then the kids could be making purchases against parental wishes. Kids put pressure on parents to buy them things all the time. However, if kids could just MAKE the purchase, that gets out of hand quickly.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
Bara_no_Hime said:
JoJo said:
Dr.Awkward said:
I never thought the term "save the whales" would go this far...
It took me a minute to work out what you meant but it was worth it, funniest post I've seen for ages!
....

Psst...

....

I don't get it. What whales?

OT: I can see an issue if kids can buy the in-app items without needing parental permission, passwords, or credit card info. If they can just do it, then the kids could be making purchases against parental wishes. Kids put pressure on parents to buy them things all the time. However, if kids could just MAKE the purchase, that gets out of hand quickly.
One of the countries that is part of the UK is Wales. I think that's where the joke is.
 

Flatfrog

New member
Dec 29, 2010
885
0
0
thebobmaster said:
Bara_no_Hime said:
JoJo said:
Dr.Awkward said:
I never thought the term "save the whales" would go this far...
It took me a minute to work out what you meant but it was worth it, funniest post I've seen for ages!
....

Psst...

....

I don't get it. What whales?

OT: I can see an issue if kids can buy the in-app items without needing parental permission, passwords, or credit card info. If they can just do it, then the kids could be making purchases against parental wishes. Kids put pressure on parents to buy them things all the time. However, if kids could just MAKE the purchase, that gets out of hand quickly.
One of the countries that is part of the UK is Wales. I think that's where the joke is.
No, I think it's a reference to a 'whale' being a term for an easy mark in a casino - someone who's willing to keep spending no matter how much they lose. I vaguely remember it turning up in a movie somewhere.

(Edit: this is driving me nuts now. I can hear the quote in my head 'He's a fucking whale, I promise you' - I think at this stage someone's trying to con the conman, because the mark in question had nothing. Aargh - was it John Cusack? Leo Di Caprio? Dammit!)
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
thebobmaster said:
One of the countries that is part of the UK is Wales. I think that's where the joke is.
Yes, but... but the OP had nothing to do with Wales.

Okay, if that was the pun, then I did get it. I just didn't realize I'd gotten it because... really, that's what everyone was saying was funny? Were the other posters being ironic?

Flatfrog said:
No, I think it's a reference to a 'whale' being a term for an easy mark in a casino - someone who's willing to keep spending no matter how much they lose. I vaguely remember it turning up in a movie somewhere.
OH! That is actually pretty clever.

I hope that is what the pun was, because that is actually fairly amusing. I just didn't know that term for an easy mark.
 

Aramis Night

New member
Mar 31, 2013
535
0
0
Johnson McGee said:
AstaresPanda said:
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
In many of these cases the kids managed to rack up thousands in charges despite parental restrictions on purchasing in the phone and the child being in the same room as the parent at the time. I don't think it's lazy parenting to let your child play games without looking over their shoulder the whole time.
If your child can't be trusted to not spend your money on a game that isn't theirs then you have failed as a parent already. If they are too young to understand right and wrong then why the hell are you letting them play games on anything that connects over a network? These are not insurmountable problems for a parent to deal with in the slightest. People raise brats because they are terrible parents and then blame everything else for their shortcomings.

Too many parents these days are no better than their own children when it comes to taking responsibility. This is half the reason right here that i'm in favor of forced sterilization of the population.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
28% of UK children aged five to 15 own a smartphone
My mum's boss' 6 year old has a laptop, iphone and ipad (all latest ones of course, then when a new one comes out it just has to be upgraded). It seems really silly to me to do this, especially when I'm fixing the laptop every other week getting rid of whatever virus it has this week. Every time I install an anti-virus and firewall and every time I get it back they've been uninstalled, her precious little daughter doesn't like having those programs on there. I'm not arsed though I get Ā£20 every time I fix it.

The problem is most parents aren't responsible these days let alone their kids. I see so many parents who blame anyone else other than their kid or themselves when the kid does something wrong. Example I saw a kid in Tesco not so long ago grab a can off a shelf and throw it at someone, the parent saw this and said to the guy who'd just been hit by a can of beans "god I wish they wouldn't put things on the bottom shelf where he can reach" no apology, no disciplining the kid. Just blame Tesco and carry on shopping.
 

EightGaugeHippo

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,076
0
0
Senare said:
AstaresPanda said:
ffs its just more lazy parenting. Once kids would just get dumped in front of the TV and then when bad or stupid things happend. TV IS THE DEVIL ! WHY WONT ANYONE OR THE GOVERNMENT DO ANYTHING THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!.

NO if your a lazy parent these days it might very well cost you, these days its more important then ever to take more interest in what your kids are doing or where you are dumping them.
Blaming parents may just be shifting the blame. It is better to investigate thoroughly than to go for easy excuses, which goes for all parties.
TV never asked the kids to "CLICK HERE FOR SUPER AWESOME CARTOON OF EPICNESS" at the cost of "virtual" money.
You download a free game for your child to play, come back later to find he or she has spent thousands of pounds on microtransactions.
First of all, it should not be that simple to allow a child to spend their parents money.
The parents didn't make it easy, it was already there in the free game just a click away.

Second don't assume you know how the parent's of this child raise their kid.

Aramis Night said:
If your child can't be trusted to not spend your money on a game that isn't theirs then you have failed as a parent already. If they are too young to understand right and wrong then why the hell are you letting them play games on anything that connects over a network? These are not insurmountable problems for a parent to deal with in the slightest. People raise brats because they are terrible parents and then blame everything else for their shortcomings.

Too many parents these days are no better than their own children when it comes to taking responsibility. This is half the reason right here that i'm in favor of forced sterilization of the population.
People telling others how to raise their kids, thats all I'm seeing in this thread.
Rather than, oh shit people are using CHILDREN to leech money out of parents via micro transactions, a scheme I might add is widely despised by a good portion of this website.

No one can trust a kid not to spend their parent's money when it is disguised as "tokens for teh win teehee"
You expect this child to understand micro transactions and be trusted not to spend all the money, all while at the same time he urrm what is the word I'm looking for? IS A FUCKING CHILD.
It's late, I'm tired and I don't much care for this argument anymore, so I'm going to finish it in bullet points.

1. If the child did understand what he was doing (which I highly fucking doubt)
then yes he should be to blame a good ten minutes on the naughty step should straighten out that bad egg.

2. Parents are not fully to blame, but they are not innocent of blame either.
Yes, they should have checked to make sure their kid did not rack up thousands in a free app game.
They are most likely sorry for not having 20/20 foresight and would like everyone to stop being judgemental pricks and telling them how to raise their kids.

3. Someone within an industry we all love, has made stealing money off parents via their kids a viable business model.
Which in case your moral compass is broken, which I assume yours is, THATS REALLY FUCKING CHEEKY.
And the majority of people here are on the side of the the cheeky, money grubbing scum who make stealing from children their bread and butter.

4. I will under go a voluntary sterilization, if you do it first.