This is a phenomenon that has gone on long enough. How quickly "Hardcore" players forget that they too were a noob as some point.
Exactly. Just what he said.Zirat said:Personally, I dont mind noobs, I often help them out when I can anf give them some constructive criticism while everyone else in the server often just yells at them to go away.
My justification is that we were all noobs at one point and need help to reach better levels of gaming
There is still a difference between newbs and noobs, you know. Noobs are those who do not take any advice from more experienced players, ignore everything someone tels them, sometimes even insults those who dare to comment on the way he/she plays, and spoils the gaming experience of other people. These are the kind of people who will instantly make a thread on a game's forum about a problem they're encountering, and bump it every 10 minutes, even when the solution could be in a previously created thread or in a stickied/FAQ thread.Bryan Lufkin said:Curing the Noobonic Plague
Spend any time on the internet speaking to gamers, and you're going to be called a noob at some point. Bryan Lufkin examines the phenomenon of many gamers' unsympathetic attitude towards those with less experience, or anyone, really.
Read Full Article
100% true.Eldarion said:Everyone on youtube is like that, not just the gamers
You know, never really sure where this stereotype came from, I was certainly never picked on for gaming. In fact the people who owned consoles and a shit ton of games were fairly popular, if for no other reason than people wanting to play their games. Besides there was never really a reason to pick on anyone that played video games when I was younger because, sure enough, there were always those weird kids that played magic the gathering or D&D.Nightfalke said:All the pissed off 25-30 year old 'hardcore' gamers are mad because when they started this hobby, they were NERDS and GEEKS and beaten up in gym class by the jocks because they played video games. Now the people who were beating them up want to play video games too, but never had to be labeled as nerds when they were young.
Not all of us. I was the first kid on the block to get an NES. It had the opposite effect than the one you describe.Nightfalke said:This.Madigan believes that the experimental group in Aronson and Mills' study is similar to "old school gamers who had to endure years of what used to be a much less socially acceptable or expensive hobby. They may overvalue their history and knowledge of gaming trivia while resenting new entrants to the scene who didn't have to go through what they did to get it."
All the pissed off 25-30 year old 'hardcore' gamers are mad because when they started this hobby, they were NERDS and GEEKS and beaten up in gym class by the jocks because they played video games. Now the people who were beating them up want to play video games too, but never had to be labelled as nerds when they were young.
And there is a certain value, in their eyes, to all that torment. A badge of honor that is being sullied by these new entrants into their domain. They don't want to be mainstream, because the mainstream took their lunch money when they were kids.
This is true also to a degree. I concur with what you've said, but please take note that over here we've really stumbled into a bigger philosophical question.Arcane Azmadi said:Personally, I think this assessment is inaccurate. Since the GIFT has already been referenced, allow me to use it to explain my take on the theory:Loonerinoes said:There's a reason, I think, as to why most hardcore gamers seem to be fine peeps IRL while usually being the kinds of twats who insult casuals over the internet to make themselves feel better.
Here's my take:tehbeard said:The problem with 'n00bs' however is proven by John Gabriel's Greater internet fuckwad theory.
Total fuckward+lack of anonymity+audience+consequences=Someone who pretends to be a "normal person"
In other words, while the Penny Arcade guys prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt and act as if it's just the anonymity and audience making them act not like themselves, I see it in reverse.
See, the common defence a lot of internet jackasses use when confronted about their behavior is "I just act that way online, I'm not like that in real life". Which from my perspective is utter bull. Someone who acts like an asshole online does so because they, in real life and everywhere else, are an asshole. The thing is, if they act like an asshole in real life, everyone would hate them, they'd have no friends, wouldn't be able to hold a job and would run a severe risk of being beaten up on a regular basis. So they curtail their natural behavior to conform to more socially expected norms and project a facade of being a "decent, normal person". But they're still an asshole.
This theory is based on the concept (and Trope) What You Are In The Dark [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WhatYouAreInTheDark], the idea that your true nature is revealed by how you act when you think no-one will know (or at least not know it's you). If you scroll down to the bottom, the Tropes page even lists people's behavior on the internet as a real-life example of the trope in effect.
So, going back to Loonerinoes' original quote which I cited, these "hardcore gamers" you mentioned are not "fine peeps" in real life. They're douchebags. They just act like "fine peeps" in real life to stop you from punching them in the balls- they prefer to bully people who can't fight back.