KungFuJazzHands said:
I have a feeling the author is taking the piss.
Honestly, I think the author of this is doing that with EVERY "8 list" released on here. Putting differences of opinions aside, many times the choices are just plain weak, if not wrong.
White Zombie does nothing to define the genre, as it did little more than play off Voodoo practices. It's "zombies" in the very loosest of terms nowadays.
Just because a movie has a segment in it, doth not mean it made any differences to the overall genre. "People thought it was rad!" is hardly a reason, much less any defining reason.
Evil Dead 1 (technically 2 as well) get's a bit of a pass here, but even then they hardly define the genre. Deadites were Deadites, not zombies seeing as they could be both living and dead, and in the case of living be 'cured' so to speak. 3 though? Hardly. If anything, all it defined was both Sam Raimi's career and part of the reason why people love Bruce Campbell.
The list shows little of how they evolved or were defined, and even less so explains. Night of the Dead is so painfully an obvious inclusion of the lists that it shouldn't be listed in the first place, seeing as Romero's take on zombies has quite literally been the single film to really define the modern zombie. Everything else is just a play on it.
Of course, often times articles rely on "hits", and what better way to gain some cheap easy hits than to make lists people will nag and hate on?