I'm not going to call it for definite, but I think the "braaaaaains" thing actually came from the first Return of the Living Dead (the gloopy zombie that gets released from one of the barrels of toxic waste). Romero's zombies just grunt, groan and growl - apart from Bub!Carpenter said:People to this day will argue that the zombies saying "braaaaains" was in night of the living dead. I can't think of any other zombie movie that does that but I have seen it done in countless zombie movie parodies, most notably the simpsons.
That's what I was saying. Maybe that wasn't clear the way I said it, I was pointing out that the Return of the Living dead movies, despite being forgotten by most have heavily influenced people's perception of zombie movie lore.DocZombie said:I'm not going to call it for definite, but I think the "braaaaaains" thing actually came from the first Return of the Living Dead (the gloopy zombie that gets released from one of the barrels of toxic waste). Romero's zombies just grunt, groan and growl - apart from Bub!Carpenter said:People to this day will argue that the zombies saying "braaaaains" was in night of the living dead. I can't think of any other zombie movie that does that but I have seen it done in countless zombie movie parodies, most notably the simpsons.
And while there are nits to be picked:
1) in NotLD, the creatures are never referred to as "zombies", although "ghouls" gets a mention (and would be more historically accurate for a monster that craves human flesh...)
2) in 28 Days/Weeks Later, the infected aren't trying to eat their victims - biting is just a way of doing more damage
With that said, I'd rather include 28 Days Later and remove the Evil Dead movies from the list and, since the "zombie genre" didn't exist until Romero made NotLD, I'd exclude White Zombie and Dr Blood. Definitely on board with Braindead/Dead Alive going on the list, though!
Yup - totally agree!Carpenter said:That's what I was saying. Maybe that wasn't clear the way I said it, I was pointing out that the Return of the Living dead movies, despite being forgotten by most have heavily influenced people's perception of zombie movie lore.
This seems to be the crux of the entire thread - what exactly constitutes a "zombie"? Since "traditional" zombies (voodoo-derived) bear few of the traits now associated with "modern" zombies, I proposed that we owe much (if not most) of what we NOW accept to be a zombie to Romero, initially in NotLD, but refined in Dawn of the Dead. That's why I put quotes around "zombie genre" - I'm not saying that Romero invented zombies, or zombie movies, but I'm suggesting that his movies define what up until then hadn't been a "genre"...Carpenter said:And that's all fine nitpicking but it doesn't matter what they are called, a zombie is a zombie. A werewolf is still a werewolf even if they just call it a monster.
Yes they were not trying to "eat their victims" but that isn't what defines a zombie, in fact the idea of zombies eating people is something that was invented later in the movies. Keep in mind that zombie mythology existed long before movies depicted zombies in any way.
...so, yup - we actually agree again!Carpenter said:Saying the "zombie genre didn't exist before Romero's NOTLD" is a bit unfair considering Romero did not invent zombies, he just formed what is now considered a zombie.
Well we are talking about art so we can't expect to stick with a strict definition of "zombie" but personally I consider a "zombie" to be a normal creature (human or animal) turned savage and violent through some means. Usually they are reanimated corpses but they could also be living things affected by a virus.DocZombie said:Yup - totally agree!Carpenter said:That's what I was saying. Maybe that wasn't clear the way I said it, I was pointing out that the Return of the Living dead movies, despite being forgotten by most have heavily influenced people's perception of zombie movie lore.
This seems to be the crux of the entire thread - what exactly constitutes a "zombie"? Since "traditional" zombies (voodoo-derived) bear few of the traits now associated with "modern" zombies, I proposed that we owe much (if not most) of what we NOW accept to be a zombie to Romero, initially in NotLD, but refined in Dawn of the Dead. That's why I put quotes around "zombie genre" - I'm not saying that Romero invented zombies, or zombie movies, but I'm suggesting that his movies define what up until then hadn't been a "genre"...Carpenter said:And that's all fine nitpicking but it doesn't matter what they are called, a zombie is a zombie. A werewolf is still a werewolf even if they just call it a monster.
Yes they were not trying to "eat their victims" but that isn't what defines a zombie, in fact the idea of zombies eating people is something that was invented later in the movies. Keep in mind that zombie mythology existed long before movies depicted zombies in any way.
...so, yup - we actually agree again!Carpenter said:Saying the "zombie genre didn't exist before Romero's NOTLD" is a bit unfair considering Romero did not invent zombies, he just formed what is now considered a zombie.
They didn't really run in that movie, just staggered quickly.DVS BSTrD said:Actually The first film to have a running zombie was Night of the Living Dead. 28 Days Later was the first to show more than one zombie running.Bob_F_It said:I would have to second 28 Days for being the first to speed up zombies.12th_milkshake said:eerrr Dawn of the Dead? 28 days later? ZombieLand - icon concepts in all these.