Updated Twitch Conduct Rules Institute Dress Code Prohibiting Nudity

roseofbattle

News Room Contributor
Apr 18, 2011
2,306
0
0
Updated Twitch Conduct Rules Institute Dress Code Prohibiting Nudity

Broadcasters using Twitch's service must wear clothing that is not sexually suggestive, and nude torsos are not allowed.

Twitch updated its rules of conduct yesterday to clarify its policies on the behavior depicted in videos, sexually explicit content, hate speech, and a dress code. Twitch states people on camera must clothe their torsos regardless of their gender.

The rules of conduct stipulate "wearing no clothing or sexually suggestive clothing - including lingerie, swimsuits, pasties, and undergarments - is prohibited, as well as any full nude torsos, which applies to both male and female broadcasters." Twitch added that if broadcasters are in an area where it's hot enough that people may not be wearing shirts or if they're wearing swimsuits, the webcam picture must be cropped to a person's face.

Twitch's reason for instituting this rule is to keep content "about the games." A rule at the end of the list also states channels' primary focus should be about games.

A Twitch representative downplayed the significance of the company's rule on acceptable dress [http://www.polygon.com/2014/10/27/7079631/twitch-topless-ban-code-sexually-suggestive], calling it "common sense."

Some have reacted to the new rule by calling attention to women streaming on Twitch, claiming they wear low-cut tops for more views. [http://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/2ki4t5/twitch_cracks_down_on_topless_and_sexually/] However, women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive," according to Twitch's examples, which focus on underwear and swimsuits.

Twitch did, however, prohibit content that places nudity as the core focus or feature of the game. Modded nudity is also not allowed.

Harassment, racism, sexism, and homophobia, and other hate speech are all prohibited, and Twitch states anyone engaging in hate speech will "disappear from Twitch." Twitch also asks broadcasters to respect non-disclosure agreement periods and to refrain from "hacking, botting, or cheating" in online games.

An earlier update to Twitch's terms and conditions required broadcasters participating with Twitch and a third-party to label videos that are part of an influencer campaign. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/137808-Twitch-Transparency-Policy-Highlights-Sponsored-Content]

Source: Twitch [http://help.twitch.tv/customer/portal/articles/983016-twitch-rules-of-conduct]


Permalink
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
This honestly all makes a lot of sense. At the end of the day Twitch is a brand and it's trying to protect itself from bad PR. If you want to stream games in the nude I am sure there are other services out there geared towards that exact concept.

The only thing I find kind of odd is the "no modded nudity" clause. Sure, keep it about the game, but a lot of people mod in nudity for games like Skyrim for immersion, not to wank to. As long as you put a content warning on your channel I don't see what the issue would be.
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
which applies to both male and female broadcasters
+1
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all. If the stupid idea of not showing nipple isn't classed as nudity then -3.
rule is to keep content "about the games."
+1
prohibit content that places nudity as the core focus or feature of the game. Modded nudity is also not allowed
-100212024352462439493463274

Seems like Twitch is starting to get more authoritarian on us.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
mad825 said:
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all.
I think they're considering male and female torso nudity to be equivalent, so if you banned tank tops on women you'd have to do the same for men.

I think it's the only fair way to do this.
 

Kieve

New member
Jan 4, 2011
128
0
0
Well damn. There go my plans for being a nudist hit on Twitch. Curse their sensible rules and common sense!

Then again... since when do tigers wear clothing anyway?
 

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,355
1,042
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
roseofbattle said:
The rules of conduct stipulate "wearing no clothing or sexually suggestive clothing - including lingerie, swimsuits, pasties, and undergarments - is prohibited"

WHAT DID THE CORNISH EVER DO TO YOU, TWITCH?!
 

mecegirl

New member
May 19, 2013
737
0
0
Fappy said:
mad825 said:
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all.
I think they're considering male and female torso nudity to be equivalent, so if you banned tank tops on women you'd have to do the same for men.

I think it's the only fair way to do this.
Yep. Cuz believe it or not, for those of us who are attracted to men, a well built man in a tank top or v neck shirt is distracting. And there are well built men who wear such shirts because they don't mind showing their muscle. But that doesn't make the garment sexually suggestive just because it shows skin, it just means that the person under it is hot. And I don't think anyone would be down with banning hotness.
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
Fappy said:
mad825 said:
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all.
I think they're considering male and female torso nudity to be equivalent, so if you banned tank tops on women you'd have to do the same for men.

I think it's the only fair way to do this.
But you don't need to ban this either way, just an a exception like "but if in a prerogative manner then no" or "only if in a non-sexual manner".

It doesn't need to be a binary state.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
mad825 said:
Fappy said:
mad825 said:
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all.
I think they're considering male and female torso nudity to be equivalent, so if you banned tank tops on women you'd have to do the same for men.

I think it's the only fair way to do this.
But you don't need to ban this either way, just an a exception like "but if in a prerogative manner then no" or "only if in a non-sexual manner".

It doesn't need to be a binary state.
The problem with that kind of language is that it's rather subjective. Some people may report a streamer for inappropriate attire simply because she's really hot, wearing a tank top and getting a lot of views. I get what you're saying though. Maybe they should just add an addendum to the whole thing basically saying, "don't try to seduce viewers with your body" or something to that effect.
 

rasputin0009

New member
Feb 12, 2013
560
0
0
I think this is to address the ridiculous amount of men going shirtless on Twitch rather than complaints from jackasses about women wearing low-cut tops. I just hope the dress-code doesn't apply to cosplay, for which many a Twitch streamer does.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Here is the list of the top videos on Twitch this week.
http://www.twitch.tv/directory/videos/week

I'm not saying putting your boobs on camera and exploiting morons for money is wrong, but it seems kind of sleazy on a site about video games.
 

JaceArveduin

New member
Mar 14, 2011
1,952
0
0
Weaver said:
Here is the list of the top videos on Twitch this week.
http://www.twitch.tv/directory/videos/week

I'm not saying putting your boobs on camera and exploiting morons for money is wrong, but it seems kind of sleazy on a site about video games.
So much Kaceytron on there... I've got a friend that claim's she's bestTrollNA
 

Spotteh Chocobo

New member
Jan 4, 2012
5
0
0
Laggyteabag said:
roseofbattle said:
The rules of conduct stipulate "wearing no clothing or sexually suggestive clothing - including lingerie, swimsuits, pasties, and undergarments - is prohibited"

WHAT DID THE CORNISH EVER DO TO YOU, TWITCH?!
I think adhesive nipple covers would have been less tactful. Lol.
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
mad825 said:
Fappy said:
mad825 said:
women's tank tops are not "sexually suggestive,"
-1
A loop hole if I've ever seen one seeing as the existence of cleavages is not mentioned at all.
I think they're considering male and female torso nudity to be equivalent, so if you banned tank tops on women you'd have to do the same for men.

I think it's the only fair way to do this.
But you don't need to ban this either way, just an a exception like "but if in a prerogative manner then no" or "only if in a non-sexual manner".

It doesn't need to be a binary state.
UGH. Sorry I completely disagree with you on this. Women have breasts, it is great women have breasts. No women should not be forced to hide the fact they have breasts because you find their breasts offensive. It was bad enough some women have to tape their breasts down to participate in gymnastics but they should not also have to do so to stream on twitch.

Two women the same shirt size can wear the exact same tank top and on one woman it shows her cleavage on the other it does not. Why? Because they do not size our clothing by our cleavage. Some women just have larger breasts than others, that does not mean they are " wearing the top in a sexually suggestive manner" it means their breasts are larger. If you buy a larger shirt, they just make the holes larger so MORE of your breast shows rather than less.

Say these two girls are streaming a star wars game wearing star wars tank tops:
Are either one of these more sexually suggestive simply because they have different figure shapes? Women come in all shapes and sizes and to determine that one is more sexually suggestive than another simply because of her physique, having a more defined waist or larger breasts is extremely sexist. Women should not be forced to hide the fact they have breasts, to suggest such is absurd.

ALSO, why would it be not okay for a woman to show cleavage but it would be okay for a game to? YIKES? you want to restrict ACTUAL women more than in game women? ;s Please elaborate because that comes across as very strange.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
Honestly I dont care, if they want to take advantage of people that somehow know how to use the internet but cant seem to be able to find a porn site then good for them.
 

Kaimax

New member
Jul 25, 2012
422
0
0
Weaver said:
Here is the list of the top videos on Twitch this week.
http://www.twitch.tv/directory/videos/week
Egad...I don't usually watch Twitch as my connection isn't strong enough for streams, but that is a concerning issue.

inb4 it becomes a women equality thing again...god damn it Ninja'd
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
Kaimax said:
Weaver said:
Here is the list of the top videos on Twitch this week.
http://www.twitch.tv/directory/videos/week
Egad...I don't usually watch Twitch as my connection isn't strong enough for streams, but that is a concerning issue.

inb4 it becomes a women equality thing again...god damn it Ninja'd
Is it concerning that busty women are reviewing the games or that more guys are choosing to watch those videos over others? Busty women and cosplay girls are fine to review games, and I see no problem with what they are doing. Guys can wear tank tops and costumes as well. The concern seems to be that more viewers are choosing these videos over the others. Maybe you should address the guys who choose these videos over others rather than trying to restrict the women making them to adhere to standards that are not equally applied to both genders.
 

deth2munkies

New member
Jan 28, 2009
1,066
0
0
It's the Kacyetron code coming into effect. Then again, she only wears really low cut shirts AFAIK so even she won't be affected. If that's the case, this is a solution without a problem.