There's only one relevant word in all of that, 'fantasy'.. This is disappointing considering the place and time period in which it is set. Both the studio and director have apologized for this - and, to be fair, many of the extras are of different races. And it's about as historically accurate as any fantasy movie, so there's that, too.
Yeah, honestly, when I first saw the trailers, all I could think was "This looks like a cheaper-looking version of Clash of the Titans".undeadsuitor said:You're not far off, it's basically Egyptian Clash of the Titans, which was already very God of Warish (especially the remake)Dalisclock said:The Trailer makes me think of God of War but set in Egypt, except without any of the set pieces that made God of War actually work as spectacle and without a tragic plot that made GoW's main character.....well, not as unlikable as he later became.
I...yeah, this.Jadak said:Re: whitewashing
There's only one relevant in all of that, 'fantasy'.. This is disappointing considering the place and time period in which it is set. Both the studio and director have apologized for this - and, to be fair, many of the extras are of different races. And it's about as historically accurate as any fantasy movie, so there's that, too.
There's plenty of fantasy movies that try to mix some fantastical material into a historical context and in those movies maybe it's relevant to complain about the locale and time period. This isn't one of them.
This movie was less 'Egypt if gods were real', and more 'what if an entire world completely unrelated to our own thematically resembled Egypt and was created and ruled by Egyptian Gods'. I mean, come on, the planet itself is a giant disc floating in space, it's more sci-fi construct than Earth.
Now don't get me wrong, the movie does kind of suck and I'm all for having some more diversity in casts. I'm just saying, if you're going to use the place and time period as an argument, pick your battles. This isn't a case of waving away the issues because the film isn't 'historically accurate', it's not even history. Both the place and time are completely made up using a popularized mythology as it's base, that's it.
tldr; Not Egypt, not even semi-historical nor does it claim to be, Egyptian-looking actors would have been no more appropriate than brits, koreans or martians.
It is bad that I thought this movie and that movie were the exact same? Who would have thunk Egyptian Mythology would be such a popular movie setting?tf2godz said:Exodus: Gods and Kings.
Exactly.Jadak said:Re: whitewashing
There's only one relevant in all of that, 'fantasy'.. This is disappointing considering the place and time period in which it is set. Both the studio and director have apologized for this - and, to be fair, many of the extras are of different races. And it's about as historically accurate as any fantasy movie, so there's that, too.
There's plenty of fantasy movies that try to mix some fantastical material into a historical context and in those movies maybe it's relevant to complain about the locale and time period. This isn't one of them.
This movie was less 'Egypt if gods were real', and more 'what if an entire world completely unrelated to our own thematically resembled Egypt and was created and ruled by Egyptian Gods'. I mean, come on, the planet itself is a giant disc floating in space, it's more sci-fi construct than Earth.
Now don't get me wrong, the movie does kind of suck and I'm all for having some more diversity in casts. I'm just saying, if you're going to use the place and time period as an argument, pick your battles. This isn't a case of waving away the issues because the film isn't 'historically accurate', it's not even history. Both the place and time are completely made up using a popularized mythology as it's base, that's it.
tldr; Not Egypt, not even semi-historical nor does it claim to be, Egyptian-looking actors would have been no more appropriate than brits, koreans or martians.
I actually thought it's what Stargate would be if the Goa'uld weren't lying about being Gods. Also Osiris was played by an Australian, huh.Dalisclock said:The Trailer makes me think of God of War but set in Egypt, except without any of the set pieces that made God of War actually work as spectacle and without a tragic plot that made GoW's main character.....well, not as unlikable as he later became.
There's been a lot of ethnic intermingling over the years, especially with the various Arab and Mediterranean cultures due to where Egypt sits geographically (traditionally a super important location for trade to pass between Africa and the Middle-East). Both Arabs and Mediterraneans are considered Caucasian, or a very close offshoot thereof, so yeah. If an Egyptian has a lot of Arab or Mediterranean ancestry, it's very likely they would look pretty "white" by most standards.Zontar said:You know of the three Egyptians I've known well in my life (1 teacher, 2 friends) only one of them was something other then what one would call "white" given how they look. And I'm not talking about a situation like Rami Malek being called white despite being of Egyptian ancestry, I'm talking "would sooner think they're from Italy or the Balkans" white.
That's not to say all Egyptians look white, far from it, but like the Levant there are many people who one would call white who are from there due to three thousand years of migration into the region by people from North African, Arabia and Europe.
Though like Jadak stated this isn't really a historical depiction of Egypt in any way.
"What if Egyptians were white?" That sounds like a fantasy that has already been done to death.MrFalconfly said:Exactly.
It's a fantasy. A thought experiment. A "what if".
I've haven't really heard that response at all. I've heard people use medieval European influences as an explanation for why it was originally written that way (although, I'm not really sure if the precise ethnic make up of the entirety of Middle Earth is ever explicitly given), but the argument given for why it would be strange for black people to be there is usually that changing the ethnicity in adaptions would contradict established lore.The Almighty Aardvark said:"What if Egyptians were white?" That sounds like a fantasy that has already been done to death.MrFalconfly said:Exactly.
It's a fantasy. A thought experiment. A "what if".
Generally if you're going to use a setting, your changes should be somewhat deliberate. "What if in ancient Egypt the gods walked among the mortals?" is a cool premise and you could definitely do some interesting stuff with that, bringing mythology to life. Or maybe you want to have something deviate from historical accuracy because it allows for a more compelling story. That's also fine, you're making the movie better.
I'm not sure "It's fantasy, they don't have to be at all representative of reality" really works in an argument. Sure it's fantasy, but people would probably be complaining if at the end of the movie someone decided to walk on air and it was never given any explanation or setup. A fantasy setting doesn't give you license to ignore reality carte blanche, it just gives you the freedom to when doing so makes the setting more interesting.
Hell, I don't hear the same argument coming up in Lord of the Rings when people comment about how white everyone is in it. The response is always "It's a setting based on medieval England, it'd be weird if there were black people". I suppose it just isn't weird when we do it with Egypt because we're used to seeing the rest of the world depicted as white