GameStop Sued Over "Deceptive" Used Game Sales

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
GameStop Sued Over "Deceptive" Used Game Sales


GameStop [http://www.gamestop.com] has been sued over its "deceptively misleading" pre-owned game sales after a customer bought a used copy of Dragon Age: Origins and then discovered he'd have to pay extra to get the downloadable content advertised on the box.

In January, James Collins purchased a pre-owned copy of BioWare's hit RPG Dragon Age: Origins [http://dragonage.bioware.com] from a GameStop in Hayward, California, paying $54.99 rather than the $59.99 cost of a new copy. "Weeks later," however, he discovered that the DLC advertised on the package would actually cost him another $15, putting the price of his used game $10 higher than the cost of a new one. When he attempted to return the game, he was told that he'd gone beyond the store's seven-day return policy and was therefore out of luck.

But rather than just learning his lesson and getting on with life, Collins did what everyone does these days: He sued. "GameStop fraudulently, unfairly, unlawfully, and deceptively misleads consumers at the time of their purchase to believe that the game comes with free downloadable content, when in fact, it does not," Collins claimed in his lawsuit. "Despite the representation on the packaging that the game comes with a free use code, unbeknownst to consumers who purchase a used copy of one of these games, upon attempting to download the content identified on the game's packaging, consumers are unable to do so unless they pay an additional fee. This occurs because the use codes have already been used by the individual who purchased the game as new."

"GameStop, who makes more than 20% of its revenue and nearly $2 billion from the sale of used video games, is aware of this issue, and continues to fail to alert customers that this content is not available on used games," it adds.

I checked out my own copy of Dragon Age: Origins and it does specify, on the back, that it includes Shale, The Stone Prisoner [http://dragonage.bioware.com/addon/] and Blood Dragon Armor as DLC, but each is marked with an asterisk; reading further, the asterisk is revealed to mean, "One time use code available with full retail purchase. Expires April 30, 2010." It seems clear enough, but then again, who's got time to read and comprehend when there's five bucks on the line?

It's an interesting and, I would imagine, entirely unforeseen consequence of EA's "Project Ten Dollar [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/98497-Retailers-Warn-Project-Ten-Dollar-Will-Hurt-Consumers]," the company's creative, hopefully successful attempt at combating used game sales by offering bonus content to people who buy new. But who is actually responsible for making consumers aware of the program and others like it: GameStop or the publishers who provide and, ultimately, limit the content?

Collins is seeking restitution, punitive and compensatory damages, legal fees and other monetary awards. A full copy of his lawsuit is available here [http://ps3movies.ign.com/ps3/document/article/107/1079852/Gamestop.pdf]. (PDF format)

Source: IGN



Permalink
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
It wasn't unforseen. That is why they put in the *. Shouldn't the lawsuit be directed at EA though? It wasn't GS who packaged it. The end result would be the same sure but he might have a chance at some free swag. If EA wasn't bitter about him buying used.

It is stupidity like this that gives "gamers" a bad name.
 

slowpoke999

New member
Sep 17, 2009
802
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
I checked out my own copy of Dragon Age: Origins and it does specify, on the back, that it includes Shale, The Stone Prisoner [http://dragonage.bioware.com/addon/] and Blood Dragon Armor as DLC, but each is marked with an asterisk; reading further, the asterisk is revealed to mean, "One time use code available with full retail purchase. Expires April 30, 2010." It seems clear enough, but then again, who's got time to read and comprehend when there's five bucks on the line?
God Damn how can people be so retarded to not read the god damn games they buy but go to the trouble of taking on a massive retailer-chain?

Edit:Can Gamestop even be sued for what they did?I mean sure it's deceitful as hell, but who the heck buys a used game for $5 less then a new one?
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
How has this dude not heard of Project 10 dollar? It's been all over the net.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
slowpoke999 said:
Andy Chalk said:
I checked out my own copy of Dragon Age: Origins and it does specify, on the back, that it includes Shale, The Stone Prisoner [http://dragonage.bioware.com/addon/] and Blood Dragon Armor as DLC, but each is marked with an asterisk; reading further, the asterisk is revealed to mean, "One time use code available with full retail purchase. Expires April 30, 2010." It seems clear enough, but then again, who's got time to read and comprehend when there's five bucks on the line?
God Damn how can people be so retarded to not read the god damn games they buy but go to the trouble of taking on a massive retailer-chain?

Edit:Can Gamestop even be sued for what they did?I mean sure it's deceitful as hell, but who the heck buys a used game for $5 less then a new one?
I did it once. I had an Edge card to take off 10% of a used game, and a coupon to do the same again.
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
Surely there's no case here?It says on the packaging that the free DLC is only for new purchases so how can this possibly be Gamestop's fault?Cheapskate should have just forked out the extra $5 and bought it new
 

Kross

World Breaker
Sep 27, 2004
854
0
0
squid5580 said:
It wasn't unforseen. That is why they put in the *.
Indeed, at least one developer has equated used games sales to piracy when viewed from the standpoint of revenue* going to the developer (and other costs like support requests from those same non-paying customers). So, outside of the piracy reasons, Project 10 dollar was likely squarely targeted at reducing/profiting from used game sales as well.


* New game money going back to the developer who made it, paying for their last several years of work or so: anywhere from $5-$20 of the $60 box if I recall correctly.

* Money from a recently released used game (i.e. games that are sold practically "as-new", and usually to the same target market that would buy the new game due to a minimal savings) sold at $55 that goes to the people who made it: $0

I can't fault Gamestop for making the most money with the least effort, as that's what companies are for, but they still have to play fair with their paying customers. And it's up to the people who do care about such things to make sure the people who deserve it get paid for their work. And it's up to us to make sure those people are informed about what's really going on as best as we're able. ;)
 

SpaceSpork

New member
May 15, 2009
2,409
0
0
Both parties are idiots. Gamestop is a stupid company. However, the guy is also stupid.

I can't decide!
 

James Cassidy

New member
Dec 4, 2008
400
0
0
I hate gamestop because they screwed me out of a lot of things. They keep forgetting to give me my code when I pre-order from them. They didn't so this just once. They have done it several times to me.

I also think it is bullshit that gamespot buys games from you saying "Oh we will give you $5 for it" only to turn around and sell it for $40 more.

However, I believe this kid is just plain stupid to be honest. It's what we call "not reading." There is a difference between gamestop screwing me over and myself being stupid causing me to be screwed over.

Although I hate gamestop, they are actually in the right on this one.
 

GrandmaFunk

New member
Oct 19, 2009
729
0
0
there's a creepiness to the editorial tone of this article that i'm not very comfortable with.

Andy Chalk said:
It's an interesting and, I would imagine, entirely unforeseen consequence of EA's "Project Ten Dollar", the company's creative, hopefully successful attempt at combating used game sales by offering bonus content to people who buy new.
why exactly would we, the consumer, be hopeful that this attempt be successful?

why are used game sales a bad thing?
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
slowpoke999 said:
Andy Chalk said:
I checked out my own copy of Dragon Age: Origins and it does specify, on the back, that it includes Shale, The Stone Prisoner [http://dragonage.bioware.com/addon/] and Blood Dragon Armor as DLC, but each is marked with an asterisk; reading further, the asterisk is revealed to mean, "One time use code available with full retail purchase. Expires April 30, 2010." It seems clear enough, but then again, who's got time to read and comprehend when there's five bucks on the line?
God Damn how can people be so retarded to not read the god damn games they buy but go to the trouble of taking on a massive retailer-chain?

Edit:Can Gamestop even be sued for what they did?I mean sure it's deceitful as hell, but who the heck buys a used game for $5 less then a new one?
How is what GS does deceitful? Unless of course the employee specifically said "ya you get the DLC" I don't see how they are to blame.
 

Shockolate

New member
Feb 27, 2010
1,918
0
0
squid5580 said:
It is stupidity like this that gives "gamers" a bad name.
I'm almost both ashamed and offended that I share a similiar name to this guy, Colin being my first name and James my middle name.
 

Tiamat666

Level 80 Legendary Postlord
Dec 4, 2007
1,012
0
0
Buy a used game in order to save 5 bucks? Seriously? You've gotta be kidding me.

In order for me to even consider to buy used, the saving amount should be at least 20% of the full price, otherwise it's just not worth it.
 

xDHxD148L0

The Dissapointed Gamer
Apr 16, 2009
430
0
0
Even though I don't think his lawsuit is as just as that guy makes it out to be, but still at least people are letting game stop know that what they do is bull. Because even though it was ultimately his fault for not "reading the box", Game stop tricks people all the time into buying used games.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
The whole thing is a giant cauldron of stupid and I can only hope that the concentration of dumb rips a hole in the space time continuum and wipes out gamestop, EA, the whiny ***** who filed the lawsuit, his lawyer, and anyone who friended him on facebook for good measure.

The real solution for publishers. Refuse to sell wholesale copies to retailers that also have used sales. That would expose gamestop for the skeezy pawnshop it is.

As far as I'm concerned there hasn't been a single good piece of DLC. Down with DLC, up with expansion packs.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Kross said:
squid5580 said:
It wasn't unforseen. That is why they put in the *.
Indeed, at least one developer has equated used games sales to piracy when viewed from the standpoint of revenue going to the developer (and other costs like support requests from those same non-paying customers). So, outside of the piracy reasons, Project 10 dollar was likely squarely targeted at reducing/profiting from used game sales as well.
I don't think it was to reduce piracy whatsoever. DLC seems to be just as readily available as any other retail game. I remember while waiting for RTO to drop people on Bioware's forums were complaining that pirates were enjoying it while us paying customers were forced to wait. I wonder if the Cerberus Network has been cracked though. It seems like it would be an effective piracy killer for the DLC anyways.