149: I've Got to be a Macho Man

Kieron Gillen

New member
Dec 31, 1969
19
0
0
I've Got to be a Macho Man

At the time of its release, Gears of War was arguably the most technically impressive game ever created. Its production values are as high as the very best games have managed, before or since. The developers even managed to distinguish it from the pack, deciding that desaturation controls were put in Photoshop for a reason, and they're bloody well going to use them. So, what's the problem?

Read Full Article
 

Sniper_Zegai

New member
Jan 8, 2008
336
0
0
A good read although as I read through the article I couldn't help constantly thinking "What kind of people would take a game like Gears of War so seriously?" I thought the over the top macho characters were am amusing throwback to games like DOOM and Duke Nukem.

I'm getting sick and tired of games and gamers who seem to want it all. When I played GoW, I wasn't expecting a harrowing tale about the last hope of humanity. I was expecting a mindless shooter with mindless characters and that's exactly what I got. You can call me stupid for enjoying such a game but I don't really care because the key word is "game", its not meant to be taken seriously, its meant to be a source of entertainment.

I've strayed into a bit of a rant here. It just annoys me how seriously people take video games sometimes. I don't enjoy fan boys and 12 year old douche bags screaming "fag" down their mic's on Xbox Live but in my opinion the kind of people who think they are too good to play a game like Gears of War and enjoy it for what it is are just as bad.

Good article, I'll look forward to more.
 

Beery

New member
May 26, 2004
100
0
0
GoW really is a closet homosexual's dream game. I mean for this title to be so incredibly successful there must be a HECK of a lot of insecure guys out there.

I bought it based on the hype, but after a few hours trying not to laugh at the 12 year-old's idea of what tough guy dialogue sounds like, and trying not to laugh at the homo-erotic OVERcurrents, and trying TO laugh at the horrible Albert-Speer-inspired architecture, and trying to come to terms with the fact that in the future everything is built like Fort Knox and grey on grey (hey, we've had COLOUR TV for donkey's years), I just gave up.

Most over-hyped game in history as far as I'm concerned. And really, if you like this stuff, ask yourself if you need to live the lie that you like girls your whole life. I mean nowadays we're all liberal on issues of sexuality - it's really okay if guys like other guys. It's not something that dudes need to hide anymore.

So I guess I don't agree with the writer's conclusions - yeah, this game is laughable - but not joyously so. Most of it is just bad, and it's way too serious (and too sexually confused) for its own good.

By the way, I hear GoW2 is in the making. I'll be keeping an eye out to see which of my friends likes it a bit too much, LOL.
 

Sniper_Zegai

New member
Jan 8, 2008
336
0
0
Beery said:
GoW really is a closet homosexual's dream game. I mean for this title to be so incredibly successful there must be a HECK of a lot of insecure guys out there.

I bought it based on the hype, but after a few hours trying not to laugh at the 12 year-old's idea of what tough guy dialogue sounds like, and trying not to laugh at the homo-erotic OVERcurrents, and trying not to laugh at the horrible Albert-Speer-inspired architecture and the fact that everything was grey on grey (hey, we've had COLOUR TV for donkey's years), I just gave up.

Most over-hyped game in history as far as I'm concerned. And really, if you like this stuff, ask yourself if you need to live the lie that you like girls your whole life. I mean nowadays we're all liberal on issues of sexuality - it's really okay if guys like other guys. It's not something that dudes need to hide anymore.
A lot of people complain about hype but nowadays its just part of the marketing of games. Am I saying Gears of War wasn't an over hyped game and ultimately didn't live up to what was promised? No, in fact, I agree. But its just the way games are sold in modern times, live with it.

On another note it disheartens me that people think saying stuff like "If you like this game you are clearly some kid of closet homosexual" is any better than shouting "fag" at someone over Xbox Live, it isn't. There are clearly jokes to be had about the characters and dialogue in Gears of War but what the hell were people expecting? I saw an action game, I played an action game. I don't know where people come off complaining about Gears of War on the basis that gays-in-denial would only enjoy such rampant macho BS as if there isn't some genuine entertainment to be had from this game because of that fact.

People these days are taking video games way too seriously. Its a "macho" game, or I guess what people think "macho" is, but does that mean it isn't fun. Is there something I am missing in the rulebook of games that dictates that I should only buy games that prove how liberal, intelligent and open-minded I am?

Bah, I think I'm not going to take any more life lessons from games and just stick to playing games for fun (Its so crazy it just might work)
 

Beery

New member
May 26, 2004
100
0
0
"it disheartens me that people think saying stuff like "If you like this game you are clearly some kid of closet homosexual" is any better than shouting "fag" at someone over Xbox Live, it isn't."

You're confused. Calling someone a 'closet homosexual' is not the same as calling them a homosexual AT ALL. 'Closet' is the operative word. While there's nothing at all wrong with being homosexual there IS definitely something wrong with the idea that it's healthy to hide your sexual identity.

This game's only value, as far as I can see, is in helping certain people pretend to be macho while clutching their joystick and avoiding the company of the opposite sex.
 

ccesarano

New member
Oct 3, 2007
523
0
0
And really, if you like this stuff, ask yourself if you need to live the lie that you like girls your whole life
I like Gears of War, aaaaaand yeah, I am pretty sure I prefer chicks to dudes.

Instead of making a real response to you specifically, I'm just going to hope you're being a complete jack-ass on purpose and just trying to get a rise out of people.


Anyway, I wasn't aware there was THAT much hatred for the look of Gears of War. I mean, personally, I didn't care until people kept making jokes about it. "So what? It's just an art style". I mean, that's how I looked at it. If you check out the graphics for Fable, people's hands and feet are too big. Is it a flaw? I prefer to think of it as an art style (one I very much like, too).

I've always been a fan of games that attempt to simulate warfare, and Gears does a pretty damn good job of it. Gears 2 looks to do an even better job. I'm hoping you get huge battlefields like in the original Halo or in certain areas of Call of Duty 4 as well as the enclosed combat. I mean, that's pretty much why I'm playing the game, and it does a fantastic job at it. I look at Gears of War as one of the next evolutions of shooting games. Particularly, ditch the first person view since third person allows for so many more gameplay possibilities.

However, there is one thing I don't like. That whole "doesn't take itself too seriously" thing is, in one way, true, but I don't think Epic really had their mind made up. As you progress through the game, a shit ton of back story is constantly hinted at, but you never get to it. All that happens are quick, less than a minute cut-scenes that push the basic action plot forward. If there was no backstory, fine. But there is, and they did try to give their characters depth, but they did nothing with it. Something similar happened to Metal Arms: Glitch in the System, but unfortunately that's never getting a sequel (especially since Swingin' Ape was swallowed up by Blizzard).

The setting for Gears is simple enough, but I can't stand when a game adds in story elements that they never dig deeper into.


Lastly: people just need to accept something as being FUN for a change. Gears of War needs to be considered for its gameplay FIRST, and its gameplay is completely solid. Everything else comes second because IT IS A VIDEO GAME. I'm all for games that can deliver all three, but Jesus Christ, stop taking yourself seriously and play Earth Defense Force 2017 for a change. Sure, rapid-fire rocket launchers are a ridiculous idea, but God dammit they're fun.

It's like movies. Not everything is going to be a masterpiece like, say, Suicide Kings. Sometimes you just need to watch a movie like "The One", because it's fun to watch Jet Li beat the shit out of himself in totally unrealistic ways.
 

BobisOnlyBob

is Only Bob
Nov 29, 2007
657
0
0
Unrelated to the main article, I have to comment on the My Chemical Romance thing...
I'm 19, right inbetween your 12 and 30 year old example.

Some days, I can't stop laughing whenever I hear it. But place it against the right sort of setting, or I just need to amp myself up for something, and Welcome to the Black Parade is suddenly the most inspiring and awesome song.

To tie it back to the article... I can laugh at Gears from a distance, and especially laugh at people who foam at the mouth about it when they're NOT playing it. But sit me down in front of it, and my social clock ticks back 5 years and I'm hunched over the controller, screaming "F***ING ******" down the headset every time I get killed.

It's interesting to note the overlap with sexuality, especially when I myself am bisexual. I just like using the term "fag" as a generic insult anyway, it's so... par for the course. It's not overly heavy-handed, and it distresses insecure brats, right-wing macho men and bleeding-heart liberals alike.
 

ElArabDeMagnifico

New member
Dec 20, 2007
3,775
0
0
Sniper_Zegai said:
A good read although as I read through the article I couldn't help constantly thinking "What kind of people would take a game like Gears of War so seriously?" I thought the over the top macho characters were am amusing throwback to games like DOOM and Duke Nukem.

I'm getting sick and tired of games and gamers who seem to want it all. When I played GoW, I wasn't expecting a harrowing tale about the last hope of humanity. I was expecting a mindless shooter with mindless characters and that's exactly what I got. You can call me stupid for enjoying such a game but I don't really care because the key word is "game", its not meant to be taken seriously, its meant to be a source of entertainment.

I've strayed into a bit of a rant here. It just annoys me how seriously people take video games sometimes. I don't enjoy fan boys and 12 year old douche bags screaming "fag" down their mic's on Xbox Live but in my opinion the kind of people who think they are too good to play a game like Gears of War and enjoy it for what it is are just as bad.

Good article, I'll look forward to more.
Unlike Duke Nukem, GoW took itself seriously, so if it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously then I missed it.
 

Sibren

New member
May 13, 2008
18
0
0
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Unlike Duke Nukem, GoW took itself seriously, so if it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously then I missed it.
I don't really understand this statement. How can anyone think GoW takes itself so seriously? When you have a 2 meter tall tank Cole screaming at every moment: "Yeah, whhoo baby!!!!"? As the article says, this is ridiculously fun. And if it isn't your taste, no problem. It's the same thing as the Naked Gun films. A lot of people love its terrible jokes, others don't understand it at all.

Very nice article by the way
 

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
Sniper_Zegai said:
When I played GoW, I wasn't expecting a harrowing tale about the last hope of humanity. I was expecting a mindless shooter with mindless characters and that's exactly what I got. You can call me stupid for enjoying such a game but I don't really care because the key word is "game", its not meant to be taken seriously, its meant to be a source of entertainment.
You just summed up my feelings. Gears isn't supposed to be about why you do what you do, it's about how you do it. Gameplay, not story. It isn't supposed to make you think, it isn't supposed to be realistic, it's supposed to be an outlet to beat some Locust, or 12-year-olds if you play on Live.
 

ElArabDeMagnifico

New member
Dec 20, 2007
3,775
0
0
Sibren said:
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Unlike Duke Nukem, GoW took itself seriously, so if it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously then I missed it.
I don't really understand this statement. How can anyone think GoW takes itself so seriously? When you have a 2 meter tall tank Cole screaming at every moment: "Yeah, whhoo baby!!!!"? As the article says, this is ridiculously fun. And if it isn't your taste, no problem. It's the same thing as the Naked Gun films. A lot of people love its terrible jokes, others don't understand it at all.

Very nice article by the way
Ok so token black man says some jokes, big deal, it still took itself too seriously.
 

Cousin_IT

New member
Feb 6, 2008
1,822
0
0
I wonder, if the COG soldiers werent built like tanks but everything else stayed the same would people be so quick to cry brokeback mountain about it? Are there homoerotic undertones in GoW? There certainly are if you go looking for them. I certainly dont see how it can be considered a game for closet homosexuals, & besides masculinity & homosexuality are not incompatible; not every gay is a "fag." Unless, that is, you arbitrarily define your masculinity by what causes a stir in your trousers in such a binary way; but thats a whole other debate.

Its a decent game, not exactly my cup of tea but I like the multiplayer (though not the people who play it, as with most Xbox games). I quite liked the gothic art style, was a bit monochrome but it suited the game atmosphere well I thought.

As for taking itself seriously, I guess in ways it did. But personally I think anyone who plays a game "seriously" is in for a dissapointment, especially if you expect it from a AAA title about space marines fighting wierd insect alien locust things. I didnt think it felt like it was taking itself too seriously, but this thread reads like a few people expected a serious game & lament that it wasnt serious enough by attacking what little there was. Like the article said, GoW is like films in the vein of Bad Boys II or Aliens etc. It was silly & melodramatic, but it was entertaining. Entertaining, the point of a "game." If you wanted an interactive Fritz Lang film, you wont find it here; but you'd be a fool for looking.
 

Fire Daemon

Quoth the Daemon
Dec 18, 2007
3,204
0
0
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Sibren said:
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Unlike Duke Nukem, GoW took itself seriously, so if it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously then I missed it.
I don't really understand this statement. How can anyone think GoW takes itself so seriously? When you have a 2 meter tall tank Cole screaming at every moment: "Yeah, whhoo baby!!!!"? As the article says, this is ridiculously fun. And if it isn't your taste, no problem. It's the same thing as the Naked Gun films. A lot of people love its terrible jokes, others don't understand it at all.

Very nice article by the way
Ok so token black man says some jokes, big deal, it still took itself too seriously.
Hardly, some of the community took it seriously but the game was never set up as a serious game. Any game in my opinion has some aspect of it that does not takes itself serious, some humour if you will.

Many gamers on any Online service are "In the closet", not just in Gears of War. This is nothing new, just because people play Gears that does not make them "Trapped in the closet". If anything people who buy Dead or Alive beach Volleyball are gay, just they want to fool themselves into thinking they are not.
 

Chalee

New member
Jan 14, 2008
42
0
0
Thing is - how is it that everbody is so certain that Gears' super-macho act is not intentionally cheesy? I somehow managed to play through it without coming into contact with internet opinion on the matter, and as I played I kept thinking to myself 'haha they are so doing this on purpose' and laughing out loud at the (in my opinion) intentionally rubbish dialogue. How can people so confidently proclaim that 'it takes itself seriously'? Perhaps the 'non taking yourself seriously' element is just not quite as pronounced as in Duke.

Can anyone say that gears takes itself seriously after looking at Fenix's jaw?
 

Ian Dorsch

New member
Jul 11, 2006
191
0
0
Beery said:
GoW really is a closet homosexual's dream game. I mean for this title to be so incredibly successful there must be a HECK of a lot of insecure guys out there.
The hilarious thing is how completely devoid of irony this is.
 

ccesarano

New member
Oct 3, 2007
523
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Two things about _Gears_ that I thought were very smart:

One, Lieutenant Kim. Asians in games tend to be portrayed as intellectual at the expense of more physical gifts, or else possessing some mystical strength derived from their spirituality. Here was one Asian that was portrayed as big and virile as any Westerner without a hint of computer skills, drunken boxing, or early childhood training by warrior monks. Don't want to give any spoilers, but the game sort of implies that he's the second most capable/courageous soldier behind Fenix, too.

Two, the 'medieval' feel of the game. Between the 'Lancers' used as melee weapons, the ridiculous armor, the spiked ball-and-chain flail-like grenades, the way the Stranded fortified themselves, and just the aesthetic of all the ruins, I felt like the game took its style cues from a pop culture idea of the dark ages instead of from sci-fi or even Mad Max like other futuristic shooters, which was kinda original. The Locust reminded me more of barbarian invaders than any sort of aliens--anyone else get that impression?
I like the way you think.

See, I see attempts at fun and seriousness in this. I mean, it's not like Epic went out to make a parody or anything. They wanted a game that was certainly fun, but I do believe they took a lot of the look, the combat, the style, and even story elements seriously.

People say the writing was rubbish, but honestly, I don't mind it. The writing is not blatantly horrible. Or maybe it is if you got your underwear so tight up your ass you may as well be wearing a thong. I mean, if you people are so critical of the smallest things, you must really hate life. There's a lot more simple and stupid shit to entertain than there is high brow art. Then again, maybe you just want to feel like some ivory tower asshat that's above everyone else. To me, that sounds more like a superiority complex.

I like the Cole Train. Firstly, because the idea of a former athlete jumping into the war willingly? That's not something I'd EVER expect to see in OUR world, so already they've got a respectful character. But even then, me and my brother are playing on co-op, the first time he ever played the game, and as soon as we reach Cole and hear "You need glasses suckah! DAYUM! Bring it on suckah! This is my kinda shit!", he laughs and says "I'm gonna like this guy!". Why? Because the character is....wait for it...it's coming.....FUN!

I mean, haven't any of you guys dropped smack on the computer at any time? I've sat there playing Halo, and when tossing a plasma grenade shouted "CATCH!" or "TAKE IT!". I just get into it. Maybe it's a throwback to watching too much Ninja Turtles as a kid, but part of the fun is to just make that kind of "I'm a bad ass" series of comments when you play. They did it in Republic Commando as well. The characters made comments, and they bantered between each other. It makes the characters that much more real. Haven't you ever had banter with your own friends? Do you even have any friends?

I dunno. I think part of the fun in Gears of War is how the characters themselves are fun. I really could care less if they are hulking monstrosities. When I play online, I play the guy with the helmet since he's got a more natural body type. I like the physical appearance of characters like that better, sure, but I'm not insanely bothered by the muscle bound look, either.

Maybe the people taking the game too seriously are the people that have a problem with it "taking itself too seriously".
 

Novan Leon

New member
Dec 10, 2007
187
0
0
Yes, I think some people take games way too seriously. I didn't care much for Gears of War but that was because the gameplay didn't appeal to me. It did what it was supposed to do, perfectly. It's a 100% adrenaline, over-the-top testosterone-fest in the flavor of Wolfenstein 3D and Duke Nukem. It's not supposed to be cultured, it's supposed to be ridiculous. Enjoy it!

It's also popular at the moment to hate all things American and, to a lesser extent, all things Western. Gears of War is distinctly Western and wholly inspired by 80's Americana. Since the 1920's it has been a fad of the uppercrust in America to look at all things foreign as cultured and sophisticated. Both of these sentiments are simply being passed down to the shallow and impressionable teenager attempting to prove himself to others.