Warner Bros. Admits Green Lantern Trailer Wasn't Very Good

Logan Westbrook

Transform, Roll Out, Etc
Feb 21, 2008
17,672
0
0
Warner Bros. Admits Green Lantern Trailer Wasn't Very Good


Studio says that the really good effects weren't ready to show when it released the trailer last year.

People all over the world got their first proper look at the upcoming Green Lantern movie last November, following the release [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/105363-First-Official-Green-Lantern-Trailer-Falls-to-Earth] of the first official trailer. The reaction to the trailer was fairly lukewarm, but fortunately for fans of the comic - not to mention moviegoers - Warner has said that that first trailer did not represent the quality of the final movie.

While at CinemaCon, Warner Bros.' worldwide marketing president, Sue Kroll, said that the problem was that the big-scale effects that a trailer would normally have been stuffed full of weren't ready to show, and the trailer suffered because of it. She noted that it was a mistake that the studio couldn't afford to make again, especially not with the movie's $200 million budget on the line, as well other associated costs, like marketing and promotion.

Apparently, Warner underestimated how long it would take to finish the elaborate 3D effects, many of which are set in space and feature aliens. Jeff Robinov, Warner Bros.' motion picture group president, said that the studio had learned its lesson about production and marketing schedules for big, effects driven, movies, and wouldn't be in a position again where the two were out of sync.

Green Lantern stars Ryan Reynolds and opens in theaters on June 17th.

Source: Company Town [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/03/warners-green-lantern-marketing-campaign-delayed-by-effects-work.html]








Permalink
 

Hungry Donner

Henchman
Mar 19, 2009
1,369
0
0
Talking about it doesn't help your cause WB, releasing a new trailer might.

Oooo a curly bracket in my captcha, at least it's not as bad as the time I got a Σ.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Nah.

I reckon that trailer is completely representative of what the movie will be like.
 

GasparNolasco

New member
Dec 13, 2010
80
0
0
Oh yeah. I believe you Warner....
Warner is lying to us. Seems like they are not 'Bros' at all!
 

manythings

New member
Nov 7, 2009
3,297
0
0
GasparNolasco said:
Oh yeah. I believe you Warner....
Warner is lying to us. Seems like they are not 'Bros' at all!
Does a Bro ever just take your money? A true Bro just borrows.

OT: I'm not sure how they think this helps. We all managed to notice how shit it looked at the time. I think the trailer was a tester to see if they could get away with cheaping out.
 

David Bray

New member
Jan 8, 2010
819
0
0
I think the shoddy prostetics, horrible lantern, useless buddy, car driving, and 'I know, right?' sum up what this movie will be
 

CrashBang

New member
Jun 15, 2009
2,603
0
0
It wasn't the effects that made the trailer bad at all, it was the awkward comedy by Reynolds, juxtaposed with the seriousness of speaking the oath etc. It didn't work
Judging from the way he behaves in trailer, he's not playing Hal Jordan, he's playing Kyle Rayner or even Wally West (the third Flash). I know they have free reign, to a degree, but it just doesn't sit right with me
 

snfonseka

New member
Oct 13, 2010
198
0
0
Actually you don't need A LOT OF 3D effects for a trailer. Take a look at X MEN First Class Trailer as an example.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
I'll reserve judgement... but yeah, I doubt it will be great. Like moviebob said, DC can't market anything that isn't Batman
 

Mumorpuger

This is a...!
Apr 8, 2009
606
0
0
Hungry Donner said:
Talking about it doesn't help your cause WB, releasing a new trailer might.

Oooo a curly bracket in my captcha, at least it's not as bad as the time I got a Σ.
Give this man a mind-reader badge.
 

SinisterGehe

New member
May 19, 2009
1,456
0
0
News flash! "Big corporations never lie in order to save money or get money!" Read all this from FÖX news.
/cough...

Yeah, I think Ill skip this movie... After all those 8 euros could be used better... In so many ways!
They will probably do some "THREEE DEEEE -*In big booming noise*" release, in order to "increase the quality of the release"... :p
 

koroem

New member
Jul 12, 2010
307
0
0
So the trailer was bad because the film's 3D effects weren't complete? Ok makes sense to me.
 

For.I.Am.Mad

New member
May 8, 2010
664
0
0
Uh oh, somebody's nervous. It's a bad sign that they're not showing ANY trailers so close to release. With Cap and Thor coming I almost forgot about Green Lantern.
 

marscentral

Where's the Kaboom?
Dec 26, 2009
218
0
0
For.I.Am.Mad said:
Uh oh, somebody's nervous. It's a bad sign that they're not showing ANY trailers so close to release. With Cap and Thor coming I almost forgot about Green Lantern.
I'm afraid I agree. The hype machine should really be gearing up and it is worryingly quiet. I think it's only because I'm a bigger fan of GL than Cap and Thor (though I like them too) that I'm really keeping track of this film.
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,794
0
0
I work at a cinema and the GL trailer is on the rotation that they show in the lobby. So I've seen it dozens of times and, unlike the Thor trailer, my expectations for the film go down each time it's on.

As a big GL fan I really hope it does well. Marvel are owning DC in the feature film department (Batman notwithstanding), and I'd like to see DC's greatest on the big screen. that said DC are putting out some excellent Animated movies.
 

ZeppMan217

New member
Apr 13, 2010
172
0
0
For.I.Am.Mad said:
With Cap and Thor coming I almost forgot about Green Lantern.
While Cap seems to be pretty...good, I suppose, Thor and GL are in the same league.