I would say parents since its only parents of kids who like these characters that I have ever seen buy these type of games.Wuggy said:A movie license game is bad. Is anyone surprised by this? My question is, who keeps buying these games? I mean, obviously they're profitable enough because they keep producing them.
Yeah, I liked the first one MUCH better than the second one. The sequel got rid of the RPG stuff I liked so much the first time around.Onyx Oblivion said:Concerning Marvel UA 1&2 at the end...I recommend UA1 if you want a bit of a hack n slash RPG. UA2 is more of a straightforward beat em up, with less skills and equipment. I also recommend both in general.
Well, considering they only cost $20 to make and they release them for every single platform known to man, they probably don't have to sell very many to make a profitWuggy said:A movie license game is bad. Is anyone surprised by this? My question is, who keeps buying these games? I mean, obviously they're profitable enough because they keep producing them.
It's either that or a bragging rights thing. The producers want to have a video game to go with the movie because it's an action movie made from a comic book and that's what you're supposed to do.Vigilantis said:I would say parents since its only parents of kids who like these characters that I have ever seen buy these type of games.Wuggy said:A movie license game is bad. Is anyone surprised by this? My question is, who keeps buying these games? I mean, obviously they're profitable enough because they keep producing them.
Also this.Fr said:anc[is]
Well, considering they only cost $20 to make and they release them for every single platform known to man, they probably don't have to sell very many to make a profit
Yeah I guess that makes sense. It's like what The Asylum does, if you don't know what that is, look it up. They make mock-ups of popular movie titles with low budget to make people accidentally buy their movie instead. Their mock up of Transformers 2 was actually better than the original though.Fr said:anc[is]Well, considering they only cost $20 to make and they release them for every single platform known to man, they probably don't have to sell very many to make a profitWuggy said:A movie license game is bad. Is anyone surprised by this? My question is, who keeps buying these games? I mean, obviously they're profitable enough because they keep producing them.
Speaking of the Asylum...which is worse, Thor: God of Thunder video game or Almighty Thor the mockbuster from the Asylum?Wuggy said:Yeah I guess that makes sense. It's like what The Asylum does, if you don't know what that is, look it up. They make mock-ups of popular movie titles with low budget to make people accidentally buy their movie instead. Their mock up of Transformers 2 was actually better than the original though.Fr said:anc[is]Well, considering they only cost $20 to make and they release them for every single platform known to man, they probably don't have to sell very many to make a profitWuggy said:A movie license game is bad. Is anyone surprised by this? My question is, who keeps buying these games? I mean, obviously they're profitable enough because they keep producing them.
Twilight.falls said:I really wish at least one licensed game would be good. Not just fine, but good.
Yes, movie tie ins. I suppose I should have been more specific.Canid117 said:Twilight.falls said:I really wish at least one licensed game would be good. Not just fine, but good.
Oh did you mean a movie tie in game?
Sega has made good games......I wouldn't use a movie tie in game as an example of any companies skill in video game making.Fursnake said:Sega is to video games what Uwe Bol is to movies...
Plus, Sega did not develop the game, they only published it. Liquid Entertainment did the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions, with Red Fly and WayForward Technologies picking up the Wii and DS versions respectively. You can blame those companies for a bad game - all Sega did was basically say, "yes, we would like free money."Swifteye said:Sega has made good games......I wouldn't use a movie tie in game as an example of any companies skill in video game making.Fursnake said:Sega is to video games what Uwe Bol is to movies...
Technically this is not a movie tie in game. It's based mostly on the comic book world/mythos, but in general on the entire Batman "universe".Canid117 said:Twilight.falls said:I really wish at least one licensed game would be good. Not just fine, but good.
Oh did you mean a movie tie in game?