Dear Origin, You Stink
Shamus believes EA is the underdog here, with Steam the clear favorite.
Read Full Article
Shamus believes EA is the underdog here, with Steam the clear favorite.
Read Full Article
Except that Battlefield 3 and SW:TOR has been recieved very well, so I'm not sure what constitutes as a fail here. Of course you're right though about SW:TOR's staying power, that's something it has yet to prove.RedEyesBlackGamer said:It seems like all of their projects to top big dogs fall short. Battlefield 3, Origin, and SWOTOR
How can something so obviously moronic even happen?Baller195 said:Even EA games like Crysis are cheaper on Steam!
You realize that TOR doesn't need origin if you buy it retail right?elvis-66 said:SW:TOR and BF3 HAVE been well received but due to the feelings towards origin they havent done as well as they could, case in point a gaming geek with disposable income (me) has made a point of ignoring both titles purely because of origin and so have a considerable number of my friends.
Another reason why this has been posted now is possibly so the Steam christmas sale could be included in the article as a point of evidence? You know? The article above comparing steam and origin?
Regarding the article it says everything I think about origin. I have no desire to use the system due to my invested time in steam coupled with my distrust of EA. This is along with my game to dollarpound value felling. Why does a game that is just a download cost more than a physical copy? Why does a game with no middle man taking a cut cost more than a direct sale from the publisher?
Origin is a system with no reason to exist apart from the greed of its creator.
BF3's multiplayer has only been well received by players too young to have owned BF2. I don't think I've read a single positive review of BF3's single player campaign, about the best I've seen of it has been 'average'.Cowabungaa said:Except that Battlefield 3