A Discussion About Games Journalists

Recommended Videos

AcacianLeaves

New member
Sep 28, 2009
1,197
0
0
I don't know how the gaming community at large feels, but I personally have very little trust in 'big time' games journalists. People like Geoff Keighley and Luke Smith are either so invested in their own money-grabbing projects that their only interest in games is as a financial one, or are easily swayed to change their opinions based on swag and how much a developer can butter them up.

Sites like Gamespot, Gametrailers, or IGN have zero credibility in my mind. They're so busy fighting over who gets the exclusive announcements or one-on-one interviews that they tip-toe around issues that we're actually interested in. They don't ask hard questions, because that might mean they lose an exclusive with a developer.

Its starting to turn into an issue as bad as political journalism, where the people who are supposed to expose the problems in the system are actually a part of the system.

I'm getting to the point where the only games journalists I trust are split between two websites: Blistered Thumbs and The Escapist. The Escapist has made a name for itself by not being afraid to challenge the status quo and call developers out on their bullshit. Hell, that's basically all that Yahtzee does - point out that even though a game may be getting perfect 10s on the big websites it still has flaws that need to be mentioned. And Blistered Thumbs is literally just a site made up of amateur journalists who are fans first, reporters second. I can trust Angry Joe to tell it like it is. I know that Bennett the Sage is going to give an honest assessment no matter what the prevailing opinion is.

G4TV is trash, and anything related to Spike is about as credible as Gamespot.

Does anyone actually watch G4TV, except to catch an odd rerun of COPS? Did anyone here actually sit down and watch any of the VGAs? Am I the only one that cringes when some news network gets a 'games journalist' on their program to discuss violence and sexuality in games? Its like the very worst of our media is at the forefront, and all the honest and trustworthy reporters are stuck in the niche of the internet.

I don't know if it matters to anyone, or if I have a point, but its something that's been bothering me. Especially with the recent VGAs, which were (again) just a long commercial meant to line the pockets of these "journalists".
 

insectoid

New member
Aug 19, 2008
701
0
0
I generally don't trust reviews from those sites either. Exclusives usually involve some sort of deal, where a site only gets the exclusive if their review is above a certain score. Advertising, also, can be a bit iffy. However, at least advertising is justifiable in the sense that it supports an organisational financially.
 

Aur0ra145

Elite Member
May 22, 2009
2,096
0
41
I agree to a point, but I understand the places you mentioned and being bad. Everyone has to make money, and if that's my enticing fan boys and making them look at your adds, well, that puts food on the table. Though I must say, I am an Escapist fan, and I love independent reviews that do it because they love it rather than for the money.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
My advice is to completely ignore the ratings any of these sites give and stick to reading the actual review. The reviews tend to be comprehensive, and will detail flaws and problems with the AAA games. Unfortunately, these flaws often don't seem to factor into the final rating, which is always positive.

You get a real impression from reading the review, not from the numbers (which are there to please the game devs).
 

BENZOOKA

This is the most wittiest title
Oct 26, 2009
3,919
0
0
I don't really care what video game journalists have to say. I use reviews just to find out what kind of a game it is.

As for guesses, promises, hype and such for a to-be-published game. I'm not interested in the slightest.
 

AcacianLeaves

New member
Sep 28, 2009
1,197
0
0
Really this pissed me off: http://www.blisteredthumbs.net/2010/12/geoff-keighley-vgas-interview/

Angry Joe is pretty much the only person I trusted to ask honest questions about the VGAs. I was super excited to hear that he was going, he was going to ask Geoff about the nature of the show, about stopping the idiotic slack-jawed catering to the lowest common denominator - and to see him disrespected like that by a fellow journalist is just infuriating.

Especially considering how the show was just as bad as its always been. Its like they were so excited that they had some minor celebrities this year they forgot that its supposed to be a show about the cream of the crop of video games. But no, let's just throw in half an hour of advertisements and some D-list actresses and that will make those idiot gamers happy.
 

LightspeedJack

New member
May 2, 2010
1,478
0
0
Yep IGN and Gamespot pretty much slap a 9 on every AAA release. If it sucks they'll give it an 8*. If it's good it'll get a 10**.

*COD Black Ops
**Halo:Reach