a hypothetical situation

Recommended Videos

Whispering Cynic

New member
Nov 11, 2009
356
0
0
"Your problem, not mine. Now be quiet, Star Trek's on."

Seriously, you wanna be trans-something? Be my guest, I don't care. If you are old enough to make a decision like this, you are also old enough to deal with it on your own.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,897
0
0
I'm having difficulty imagining myself as the parent of a living child old enough to speak. I've never had much patience for children, even when I was one myself.

Assuming all of that isn't an issue, my reaction would probably be along the lines of
"Okaaaay... just remember to apply the birds and the bees thing in reverse, then... and try to be safe about it."
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Arontala said:
lacktheknack said:
I'd probably be fairly upset, and would immediately start grilling with questions of "Why?" and such.

I'd also forbid them from acting on it until they had left my home. I'll have raised them under my general understanding of gender (claiming there are no inherent differences is silly) and will have worked hard to get them comfortable in their own skin. To have them basically invalidate all my work would be pretty upsetting. Not to mention that the various "coming out of the closet"s that I've witnessed have always been messy and tend to involve the person who came out being incredibly insensitive and even cruel to those around them during it, which has soured my feelings towards it.

Oh, I'm sorry, do I not fit this forum's But Thou Must standard of tolerance and understanding?
So you would be mad at them for your own perceived failings?

Or am I not reading that right?
Not what I was going for. Think of it as building a house, only to find out that it's about to be used as a small industrial factory.

Really, it's more about personal hangups over transgenderism, but you can't say those here without being set on terrifying fire.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
Zachary Amaranth said:
Rainboq said:
I'd like to point something out here, Transgenderism isn't purely psychological. There are cases of over exposure to androgens in utero that result in the child having a predisposition towards being transgendered.
It's not really a predisposition, though. Hormonal influences in the womb are one factor in brain setups that simply identify as something different than the body you're born into. But predisposition? You kind of...Are or you aren't.
I'm afraid biology isn't really that cut and dry :/

Being trans can be caused by a variety of factors, and there is no sole cause discovered as of yet, hence why I left out the imperative of saying that the exposure to certain adrogens would directly result in transsexual/transgender-ism, as the child might live their lives as a cis-person and be perfectly happy, or they could not, as I said, biology isn't very cut and dry.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
lacktheknack said:
Arontala said:
lacktheknack said:
I'd probably be fairly upset, and would immediately start grilling with questions of "Why?" and such.

I'd also forbid them from acting on it until they had left my home. I'll have raised them under my general understanding of gender (claiming there are no inherent differences is silly) and will have worked hard to get them comfortable in their own skin. To have them basically invalidate all my work would be pretty upsetting. Not to mention that the various "coming out of the closet"s that I've witnessed have always been messy and tend to involve the person who came out being incredibly insensitive and even cruel to those around them during it, which has soured my feelings towards it.

Oh, I'm sorry, do I not fit this forum's But Thou Must standard of tolerance and understanding?
So you would be mad at them for your own perceived failings?

Or am I not reading that right?
Not what I was going for. Think of it as building a house, only to find out that it's about to be used as a small industrial factory.

Really, it's more about personal hangups over transgenderism, but you can't say those here without being set on terrifying fire.
Maybe in your experience, but given what you've said about your past experiences, the views you hold have been created by your past experiences, as they have for all of us, as such, there is nothing inherently wrong with them. Now what you do with your views and biases may or may not be inherently wrong, it really depends on how you apply them and how much damage (be it physical or psychological) you may or may not cause with them.

That being said, why not tolerate the child? You may not be okay with it, but studies have shown that attempting to condition a transperson out of being trans only leads to depression and suicidal urges.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
ravensheart18 said:
Rainboq said:
Situation follows: Okay, I want you to imagine yourself as a parent. Now, this child, of whichever gender, comes out to you as a transgender, what do you do?
Child? What age?

What do they want to do about it?

Reguardless of age if they want to chop off genitals, I have a problem with it. I see that as self mutilation and a form of body dismorphic disorder. Anything else, once they are old enough to make their own choices they can dress how they want and date who they want.
Okay, that's making a straw-man argument and trivializing what a trans person is. As for age, well, most likely in their teens or twenties, old enough to understand how they feel. As for the things with the genitals, many choose not to undergo SRS, and even then, its not simply chopping them off, but I'd rather not get into that, it can get a bit graphic for the squeamish, as such, look up Sex Reassignment Surgery.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
Bara_no_Hime said:
MassiveGeek said:
Let them be transgender.
Really, I wouldn't care personally, it's my kid and they can be whoever they want to, I support them wholeheartedly.
This.

Gender is merely a social construct anyway.

OP: By the way, if you mean transgender AND transexual, then... still this. Although the second option is far more expensive, and not covered by my insurance.
Fixed the error, I seem to have a misconception as to what the definitions of Transgendered and transsexual are. :S
 

redisforever

New member
Oct 5, 2009
2,157
0
0
Ask, "Are you sure?", talk to them about it for a while, and if they're sure, say ok, and then support whatever they do, unless it's illegal, or course.
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,392
0
0
"Cool story, bro."

If they then ask my opinion, I'll reply with "As long as I'm not paying for the operation, go for it."
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,644
0
0
Rainboq said:
Fixed the error, I seem to have a misconception as to what the definitions of Transgendered and transsexual are. :S
If you want to get technical, gender and sex (as in male, female, etc) are two different things. I usually use the words interchangeably, but that is technically incorrect of me. The reason why becomes clear in the definitions of transgender vs transexual.

By my understanding *, and in overly simplified terms, it works like this:

Transgender - my body is female, but I feel male (or other) so I will act like how I feel.

Transexual - my body is female, but I want to be male, so I will alter my body to match how I feel.

So transgender is about feelings and behavior, whereas transexual is about getting sexual reassignment surgery. They are OFTEN the same thing (ie I feel this way, so I will get surgery to make my body match) but some transgenders choose to forgo surgery - particularly if they feel "other" rather than one sex or the other.

[sub]*Note: I know a transgendered individual IRL who isn't interested in surgery. This is my understanding based on what that individual has explained to me concerning his/her feelings on the matter.[/sub]
 

Lambi

Yuki-Onna
Oct 20, 2009
30,217
0
0
I'd probably be surprised at first, especially if I hadn't noticed before if they had tried to keep it secret from me, not knowing how I would react. But after the initial reaction, I would support them. They are my child and deserve all my support.
 

Mischa87

New member
Jun 28, 2011
197
0
0
Indeterminacy said:
I hope you don't find this intrusive, but would it be possible to ask about whether there was something in particular about having a male body that contributed to your decision to transition?
Well, that's always a tricky point, I've spent a quarter~ of my life in transsexual support groups, heck, I've even co-founded and ran a transsexual support group, and a general LGBT one. And nowhere have I found someone who could describe the feeling of being born in the wrong body as anything other than that "wrong" but at the same time, that feels like a gross understatement... there just isn't words for how terrible it feels... It's just like... infinitely wrong...

I guess I could throw some stats at you that might put it in perspective. (I can't speak for transmen for the most part, data is often incomplete, most likely due to less work being done with transmen, as they often have a relatively easier time integrating into a satisfactory place in transition, save for actual sex reassignment surgery which many opt out of due to... just being not very effective) The suicide rate for transwomen is about 70% by age 30, and of those 30% who have not by that time, at least roughly 50% have tried at least one (The stats for transmen are about 30% by age 30, not sure on the attempt stats) Then there's the 4/40/400 set of stats for transwomen (sorry transguys, don't have anything like this for you) In comparison to ciswomen (that's natural-born women, and keep in mind these are rough values which I had learned of several years ago, there might be a change) Transwomen are 4 times more likely to be the victim of a violent crime, 40 times more likely to be homeless, and 400 times more likely to be a victim of sexual abuse (Considering that 1 in 4 North American women will be sexually abused by their 18th birthday, that's pretty damn grim)

Indeterminacy said:
My current theory about transsexualism (as you might have glimpsed if you've read the discussion in this thread) is that the physical changes are instrumental to the aim of full cross-gender transition. I just wondered if your experience might throw up some challenges to that.
Well, that's not entirely true to be honest, there are plenty of non-operative transpeople (People that choose, or for other reasons are unable to get a sex-change operation) Who are no less their gender than people who do get the surgery, or cispeople for that matter.

I can use myself as an example, I would opt out of sex-reassignment surgery at the moment, because I find the results unsatisfactory (as far as sensitivity/orgasmic rate) I also suffer from PDOD (Pleasure Dissociative Orgasmic Disorder) Which basically means I can't even feel an orgasm, and due to how butt-ugly and damaged I am, chances are I will be alone for the remainder of my days (I've come to terms with this) The only time my genitalia even see the light of day is while bathing/changing (And even then, my breasts usually block my view of them *grin*) So not having the operation is not that big of a deal for me personally, of course if the method was perfected, of course I would want it done, but it's just something *I* Personally have to deal with.

Now, yes, there are plenty of transwomen (Never really seen this in transmen) Who basically state that you're not a real woman unless you get the surgery done... Which is pretty hurtful to a lot of people, but I don't really pay them much notice, they're like... To the trans community as femnazis are to women striving for equality, to be pointed at and laughed.

Another thing, is that to be legally female (In Canada, I think the US too, maybe the UK, I apologize, I've been out of the trans-support circle for a couple years now) You do in fact need sex-reassignment surgery, that certainly adds to the drive to have it done.

Hope my relatively incoherent sleep-deprived ramblings have answered more questions than they've created (Or, if you like asking questions, I hope I created some more)

Captcha: ggestern against
 

Indeterminacy

New member
Feb 13, 2011
194
0
0
MorgulMan said:
I think I'm more or less in agreement with what you're saying, and your assessment of what I'm saying. In particular, when I talked about social and psychological marks, I think you put it more clearly in talking about dress, mannerisms, graces, and interests. Obviously in today's society, this is really only a "problem" with biological boys who feel inclined to feminine marks, as it is not shocking, unusual, or generally considered unacceptable for women to wear "traditional" men's clothes, do a "man's job", or swear like a sailor. (Whether any of those things are particularly desirable or attractive are up to the individual's tastes.)

So, to adjust or clarify the hypothetical, if my son (hypothetically now a teenager or older) tells me he feels the desire to wear a frilly pink dress, or a thong, or wants to become a gymnast or dance in the ballet, I would treat that in an entirely different way than if he said he wanted to be a woman, or was already a woman. The first group is a bucking of more-or-less arbitrary societal norms, while the second is a violation of (what I think) you refer to as authenticity, what I would say is his biological reality. (I would not be against, in principle, using your terms and arguments, once I fully understood and was able to accept their truth/usefulness.) The one thing I would have SOME issue with is wearing a dress. ("Sorry, son, but you just don't have the figure for it.") Part of that may just be my ingrained expectations, but as I said, I don't think he's have the hips for it...a dress would attempt to accentuate or emphasize body features he doesn't possess. I'd probably try and find out if maybe he'd just consider bringing back the tunic, or robe, or a poncho of some sort. And then I'd realize that this is all my fault for all those Jedi costumes and Nazgul outfits when he was a kid.
Ah, good thought. So there are some facets of gender identity where the association to sexual identity is stronger than others. In fashion, this is generally more true of the female/feminine correspondence than the male/masculine. Is there a corresponding virility sign in masculine gender roles? Maybe physical sports and competitiveness have that sort of impact, which would explain the general opposition to tomboyism.

In any case, this association may not be entirely prima facie obvious for the casual observer. After all, why can't girls enjoy playing football, or boys want to show off their figure? It's only later on when sexual maturity comes into play where these associations become more apparent (if they do). And then one's character is contrasted with the sexual identity division by virtue of the interpretive connections that have always been in place on those activities, mannerisms and signs but never fully explained.

Drawing the distinction between transgenderism and transsexualism, then, while the former can be a fairly persistent (albeit oftentimes difficult) issue of resisting societal pressure to adhere to the conventions of masculine/feminine symbolism, the latter is more about when this moment of realising the sigificance between one's non-conforming gender identity and its sexual implications gives rise to serious personal crisis.

I guess the problem here is really about what individuals can do about such a huge cultural imposition. You could quite plausibly respond to this moment of crisis by abandoning the society you currently live in for one in which sexual connotations are diminished. But I doubt there are many examples of this, and it might still be a serious and disturbing event to go through even if you can successfully integrate into the new society. You might also take the opportunity to strongly oppose the necessity of persistent sexual interpretation. But it's not always worth peoples' time to do that. I'm happy to fight that battle because I'm interested in language and symbolism anyway, but if you're just not aware of the nature of the problem, or haven't the resources or confidence to openly oppose social standards, then it seems incredibly unfair to demand you fight for your own personal sanity.

So I see where transsexuals are coming from a bit better with that clarification. It still seems like the occurrence of transsexualism points to a radical instability in the way our culture glorifies sex in even the most seemingly innocuous ways. I would say that I would appreciate more people acknowledging that it is a social problem, rather than dissolving the pressure by going through transition, but acknowledge that it's probably unfair to demand that people having such problems follow me into the much more difficult path to resolving their problem.
 

Discord

Monk of Tranquility
Nov 1, 2009
1,988
0
0
My response?

*Ahem*

"That's nice, Um Take our the trash would ya". Seriously, I mean What else can I say I don't give a crap about these things. I know that's easy for me to say now because I don't have kids and stuff but I like to believe there are worse things a child could say to a parent...

" I'm pregnant"
"I might be infected with something"
"I'm dropping out of middle school" (It happens, trust me)
"I wrecked your 68 Camaro"


I mean in my eye the job of a parent is to teach and guide and if that's the child's choice, hey more power to ya and I got your back. There's so much other troubles in the world and they only get bigger, If i can help remove some by being a level of support then I've done some good.
 

Indeterminacy

New member
Feb 13, 2011
194
0
0
Mischa87 said:
Well, that's always a tricky point, I've spent a quarter~ of my life in transsexual support groups, heck, I've even co-founded and ran a transsexual support group, and a general LGBT one. And nowhere have I found someone who could describe the feeling of being born in the wrong body as anything other than that "wrong" but at the same time, that feels like a gross understatement... there just isn't words for how terrible it feels... It's just like... infinitely wrong...
That's fine, I'm not going to put any pressure on you to that effect. Thanks for trying though.

Mischa87 said:
I guess I could throw some stats at you that might put it in perspective. (I can't speak for transmen for the most part, data is often incomplete, most likely due to less work being done with transmen, as they often have a relatively easier time integrating into a satisfactory place in transition, save for actual sex reassignment surgery which many opt out of due to... just being not very effective) The suicide rate for transwomen is about 70% by age 30, and of those 30% who have not by that time, at least roughly 50% have tried at least one (The stats for transmen are about 30% by age 30, not sure on the attempt stats) Then there's the 4/40/400 set of stats for transwomen (sorry transguys, don't have anything like this for you) In comparison to ciswomen (that's natural-born women, and keep in mind these are rough values which I had learned of several years ago, there might be a change) Transwomen are 4 times more likely to be the victim of a violent crime, 40 times more likely to be homeless, and 400 times more likely to be a victim of sexual abuse (Considering that 1 in 4 North American women will be sexually abused by their 18th birthday, that's pretty damn grim)
There's no doubt it's tough. Societal attitudes towards transgendered individuals in general are shocking, and while those figures about abuse are really very sad reading, they're not entirely unexpected.

Mischa87 said:
Well, that's not entirely true to be honest, there are plenty of non-operative transpeople (People that choose, or for other reasons are unable to get a sex-change operation) Who are no less their gender than people who do get the surgery, or cispeople for that matter.
Okay, sure. It might be possible to quite happily live with a feminine gender while in a male body, given the freedom to be sufficiently expresssive in a feminine way. Though I'm including (for instance) people who go into full HRT but no further as Transsexuals rather than transgendered.

Mischa87 said:
I can use myself as an example, I would opt out of sex-reassignment surgery at the moment, because I find the results unsatisfactory (as far as sensitivity/orgasmic rate) I also suffer from PDOD (Pleasure Dissociative Orgasmic Disorder) Which basically means I can't even feel an orgasm, and due to how butt-ugly and damaged I am, chances are I will be alone for the remainder of my days (I've come to terms with this) The only time my genitalia even see the light of day is while bathing/changing (And even then, my breasts usually block my view of them *grin*) So not having the operation is not that big of a deal for me personally, of course if the method was perfected, of course I would want it done, but it's just something *I* Personally have to deal with.
I think this gets very close to the real heart of my question, so thanks very much for talking about it. I guess I'm really wondering about whether the level of change in sexual identity that best resolves the feeling of gender dysphoria might be different depending on the conditions and society transsexual people live in. In your current position, you accept (though perhaps not as an ideal) that moving towards a "complete" sexual reasignment would not be the best resolution of your gender identity at present. But had things been different and the medical environment better suited towards effective surgery, you would want to use this additional level of physical correction. Would the compromise point be less tolerant of "partial" transitions if the techniques of surgery and gender dysphoria diagnosis were improved and made more generally available? And would this be an acceptable consequence?

It might be a moot point, of course, since society at large seems pretty intolerant of "partial" transitions anyway. The particular societal change that interests me in this respect is precisely that of changing attitudes towards gender roles. Would there be less pressure to transition in a world where we don't mind so much whether you're strictly masculine or feminine? Or would we rather be more open towards transitioning towards a sexual identity that matches individual gender variations? It's not an easy thing to try to speculate on, or even to try to think about possible consequences.

Given that the last 4 years or so seem to have been something of a shocking social regression in the face of economic downturn, rather than a positive change, that, too, might be a moot question.

Mischa87 said:
Now, yes, there are plenty of transwomen (Never really seen this in transmen) Who basically state that you're not a real woman unless you get the surgery done... Which is pretty hurtful to a lot of people, but I don't really pay them much notice, they're like... To the trans community as femnazis are to women striving for equality, to be pointed at and laughed.

Another thing, is that to be legally female (In Canada, I think the US too, maybe the UK, I apologize, I've been out of the trans-support circle for a couple years now) You do in fact need sex-reassignment surgery, that certainly adds to the drive to have it done.

Hope my relatively incoherent sleep-deprived ramblings have answered more questions than they've created (Or, if you like asking questions, I hope I created some more)
Questions are good, and I think your contribution has added some more meat to the bones of the bigger questions I've been mulling over. =D

There's one other question I did have, though, which is about the apparent oddness of a transsexual "community". I mean, I accept that there is a clear and important function of being able to talk things over with fellow transsexual people for support and encouragement. But presumably a lot of people go into the transition process with the idea of passing as the other sex; potentially even to the point of keeping secret that they were ever the original in the first place. Doesn't this make relationships within the community rather turbulent?
 

Last Hugh Alive

New member
Jul 6, 2011
494
0
0
Well, what could I really say? I can disagree all I want but the child will still do what they enjoy doing. All I can do is relax, it is most likely just a phase.
 

Mischa87

New member
Jun 28, 2011
197
0
0
Indeterminacy said:
That's fine, I'm not going to put any pressure on you to that effect. Thanks for trying though.
Yeah, really sorry about that, but I've yet to find a suitable description of how it feels, or anyone else who could... I've heard plenty of times one would need some sort of device, or technique to actually simulate what it would be like... Not sure how that would work on someone who's already lived their life comfortable in their gender presentations, nor would I ever wish that sort of experience on someone... Save for perhaps poetic justice (Bigots, transphobes and the like)

Indeterminacy said:
There's no doubt it's tough. Societal attitudes towards transgendered individuals in general are shocking, and while those figures about abuse are really very sad reading, they're not entirely unexpected.
Yeah, there's a saying among the community "The biggest obstacle in a transperson's life, other than their own body, is other people" Which really rings true all-too-often... I mean, in pretty much any coming-out or transitioning guide you'll find online, they outright tell you, you will lose any job, relationship, and family you had, now that doesn't happen all the time, but it happens often enough to prepare for it.

Indeterminacy said:
Okay, sure. It might be possible to quite happily live with a feminine gender while in a male body, given the freedom to be sufficiently expresssive in a feminine way. Though I'm including (for instance) people who go into full HRT but no further as Transsexuals rather than transgendered.
I wouldn't go so far as saying they're happy (Remember those stats on suicide) But yes, some people find a way to keep going, even without a more feminine body, I'm still here (albeit I'm still pretty young, and have given myself a purpose in life to keep me going) Also, keep in mind, those people just on HRT are still considered transsexuals, there's a lot of misconception behind "transgender" and "transsexual"... and "transvestite" as well as "intersexed" for that matter. Without going to far into it, transgender is an umbrella term used for anyone who's gender doesn't entirely match what society would expect of them based on their sex (This could be transvestites, gender benders, bigendered people, heck, I'd even consider metrosexuals to be transgendered (I'm looking at you dad *grin*) and of course, transsexuals) And a transsexual is someone who's actively changing their body/appearance/presentation to match their gender, which means someone on HRT is doing just that.

Also, a little side-note, a lot of transsexuals don't like to be referred to as "transgendered" Because it can have an unwanted connotation (Namely, society's way of using transsexual and transvestite interchangeably) Not that there's anything wrong with transvestites, it's just they have much different motives for what they do (Fetishtic purposes) Which the transsexual community doesn't want attached to us heck, a huge chunk of the transsexual community is asexual. I've found a lot of transwomen even go so far as to remove one "S" from transsexual, to remove the word "sexual" from it... although... having an s right beside it kinda renders that moot... Yeah...Trans exual? Trans eckual? *Shrug* (From what I've noticed, most who do that, are also the some folks who claim that if you don't get surgery, you're not really your gender)

Indeterminacy said:
I think this gets very close to the real heart of my question, so thanks very much for talking about it. I guess I'm really wondering about whether the level of change in sexual identity that best resolves the feeling of gender dysphoria might be different depending on the conditions and society transsexual people live in.
If you mean a change in gender presentation instead of "sexual identity" then sure, the same way that people of a certain culture/gender can be vastly different from those of the same gender, and a different country/culture. I mean, look at English guys, and say... Brazilian guys, polar opposites really.

Taking myself as an example (No, you're an attention whore!) I'm Half-Ukrainian, part Mi'kmaq (I love it when spellcheck says part of my history isn't a word) and a little mishmash of different European nationalities (I'm actually relatively closely related to the late Princess Diana) But anyway, I was raised in a dairy farming community, by a construction worker, and a farmer-turned-janitor. This has imbued myself with personality characteristics one might call "Tomboyish" And that's very much true, that's what I've become, based on my culture, my location, and circumstances, much like plenty of the ciswomen around here. Whereas I have friends just 2 hours away in the capital city here, who are dainty, *Cough* Ditzy *Cough* hyper-feminized, *Cough* Catty *Cough* And the like. We've all taken on the characteristics of the women/culture around us. We each have our different levels of "femininity" we feel we need to present to be comfortable in our own skin.


Indeterminacy said:
In your current position, you accept (though perhaps not as an ideal) that moving towards a "complete" sexual reasignment would not be the best resolution of your gender identity at present. But had things been different and the medical environment better suited towards effective surgery, you would want to use this additional level of physical correction. Would the compromise point be less tolerant of "partial" transitions if the techniques of surgery and gender dysphoria diagnosis were improved and made more generally available? And would this be an acceptable consequence?
I apologize, but I'm not 100% sure I grasp what you're asking here, but I'll try to answer.

Yes, if the procedures were more satisfactory, I would definitely move towards that (If I could afford it, which I can't) Although, not all transpeople are the same, I've known plenty of transpeople who actually want to keep their birth-given genitalia, there's more than a couple reasons for this, ranging from the fact that, for example, a neo-vagina is pretty high-maintenance, or maybe a transwoman is also lesbian/bisexual/pansexual, and find it useful to keep their male genitalia.

And if you're asking if the procedures were perfected, if not getting them would the community be less tolerant of those who opt out, I wouldn't think it would change, it's pretty widely-accepted within the community that, as I like to put it "It's what's between your ears, not what's between your legs" Of course, as I mentioned before, there's a certain elitist part of the community, but hey, point and laugh.

And as for general society, I think you answered that yourself below:

Indeterminacy said:
It might be a moot point, of course, since society at large seems pretty intolerant of "partial" transitions anyway. The particular societal change that interests me in this respect is precisely that of changing attitudes towards gender roles. Would there be less pressure to transition in a world where we don't mind so much whether you're strictly masculine or feminine? Or would we rather be more open towards transitioning towards a sexual identity that matches individual gender variations? It's not an easy thing to try to speculate on, or even to try to think about possible consequences.
Well, yes, I imagine there would be less pressure to pass in regards to gender presentation, but unfortunately, much of the pressure to transition, is a comfort thing, to feel comfortable in our own skin, to try to rid ourselves of this overwhelming sense of "wrongness" with our bodies.

But as you said, it's difficult (But totally interesting and thought-provoking) to think about what it would be like in different situations, and the like. I've actually had a chat with a friend the other week about how things would be different if society were different/perfect. They had put forth the idea that if we could wear a symbol of our gender, never got too much into it, just... a symbol, and that everyone would instantly know our genders, and what to correctly refer to each other as. But I know right off the bat, there would be people right withing the transcommunity itself that would be against that, that we shouldn't have to advertise, that we should just be able to be "normal" like everyone else (That's what we're striving towards anyway, to be ourselves first, and to have a normal life alongside) Then of course there's people who don't subscribe to binary gender, or gender roles, etc, etc... Yeah... pretty complicated, and it wouldn't solve the self-comfort issue anyway.

Indeterminacy said:
There's one other question I did have, though, which is about the apparent oddness of a transsexual "community". I mean, I accept that there is a clear and important function of being able to talk things over with fellow transsexual people for support and encouragement. But presumably a lot of people go into the transition process with the idea of passing as the other sex; potentially even to the point of keeping secret that they were ever a man in the first place. Doesn't this make relationships within the community rather turbulent?
Well, it can, and does at times. There can be a lot of flak directed at, and coming from those who manage to be perfectly passable *sigh* And leave the community behind. Some people can be pretty bitter about it, and resent them, but I think that mostly comes from those who have lost hope about transitioning/passing themselves. Although, any mature person can clearly see that's what most of us are aiming for, to blend in, to be "normal" And we should be happy for them.

Like I've mentioned, there's also some elitist groups and the like, which can cause all sorts of conflict. There's also those who may or may not pass, but are still open about their trans-status... and... sadly create animosity towards those who just want to be themselves, and live a "normal" life.

Personally, I have no hope of ever passing as a woman (I may have an extremely rare condition that blocks estrogen receptors in my cells, rendering part of HRT ineffective, my endocrinologist is still looking into it) But I've spent years of my life helping other people to transition, and try to get themselves into a "normal" existence...

I'd sooner sit and watch the birds soar, then try to fashion my own wings from the dirt...



Well, hope I answered your questions satisfactorily, feel free to ask more, or even message me with them if you feel the need(That's open to everyone) The way I see it, there's no way a legit question about myself, or this topic, that could ever be as offensive as the flak we get from people intentionally trying to insult myself/us.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Indeterminacy said:
I do not doubt for one minute that hormones would have an impact on my cognitive state. In fact, the use of supplementary hormones seems to positively support my position that biology need have very little to do with the problem at hand of self-identity. We can overrule our current biological state through acts of will, should we be so inclined.
"Will" isn't enough. Intervention is needed. You just used it yourself as an argument.

So, medical intervention proves that medical intervention is unnecessary? You're talking in circles, trying to justify a stance that does not stand on its own.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
MorgulMan said:
You can and many, I'm sure, do make that assertion, but saying it doesn't make it so.
Nope, but nor does it make it false. I have peer reviewed science on my side, and you have "an opinion."

Remind me which one of us is simply "saying" it.

Speaking of:

It is precisely because I love my children that I would affirm reality and try to help them reconcile their internal conflict with that reality.
Calling it "reality" does not make it so.

You are confusing what you WANT to be true with reality.

Sorry.
 

Indeterminacy

New member
Feb 13, 2011
194
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
So, medical intervention proves that medical intervention is unnecessary?
In a sense, though we'd need to equivocate over "medical intervention" here to grasp my meaning. I'm not saying "we can cure this particular problem so we don't have to", but rather "our medical capability to manipulate physiology raises questions about whether we should use it to solve a particular problem".

Transsexualism is at least in some sense similar to questions of transhumanism and physical augmentation. I'm saying there is a need to weigh up the questions of whether it's a socially positive thing to widely develop or to encourage sexual reassignment procedures or not. And it seems right to me (just as it is for say mechanical limbs or embedding computation devices into human cognition) that there are considerable social problems that would be worsened by such procedures unless we deal with those problems first.