Imagine the world if all humans were mind-readers...
...
Now, I'm going to that corner to freak out... -_-
...
Now, I'm going to that corner to freak out... -_-
This is the worst case scenario and it is terrifying.Zack Alklazaris said:Ok... lets think about this for a moment. What is the best real world example of the inner thoughts of the world.
Imagine having every person of facebook in your mind, every message they send, every status they write, every picture they take all goes into your head as thoughts in real time.
and thats just 32% of the world who has internet access
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Well I'm pretty sure the world supplies of bleach, hard alcohol and happy pills would be exhausted before you can say "Boy, that escalated quickly".SckizoBoy said:Imagine the world if all humans were mind-readers...
empathy of that sort is quite explainable by deep rooted subconscious instinct (yes, instinct, we do still have a few of those), no need to read more into it unless given information that doesn't fit that profile.Blood Brain Barrier said:I wouldn't rule out a degree of telepathy already existing. We haven't identified the phenomenon but if you watch crowd behavior and sporting events as well as the way people interact, it seems possible given some imagination.
I don't believe in instinct. Everything we do is instinct, from eating to talking about the latest Batman movie. It's a 19th century concept, very much outdated.Heronblade said:empathy of that sort is quite explainable by deep rooted subconscious instinct (yes, instinct, we do still have a few of those), no need to read more into it unless given information that doesn't fit that profile.Blood Brain Barrier said:I wouldn't rule out a degree of telepathy already existing. We haven't identified the phenomenon but if you watch crowd behavior and sporting events as well as the way people interact, it seems possible given some imagination.
Interesting. the line between pre-programmed and learned behavior has blurred somewhat in recent decades, but last I checked, theorems on the nature of instinct still play a major role in related fields. To my knowledge, there is no denial of it as a factor of human and animal behavior from any significant portion of the involved researchers.Blood Brain Barrier said:I don't believe in instinct. Everything we do is instinct, from eating to talking about the latest Batman movie. It's a 19th century concept, very much outdated.Heronblade said:empathy of that sort is quite explainable by deep rooted subconscious instinct (yes, instinct, we do still have a few of those), no need to read more into it unless given information that doesn't fit that profile.Blood Brain Barrier said:I wouldn't rule out a degree of telepathy already existing. We haven't identified the phenomenon but if you watch crowd behavior and sporting events as well as the way people interact, it seems possible given some imagination.
I'm not asking what the "involved researchers" think, I'm asking what you think. I was hoping to have a discussion but if you want to throw around big words and phrases like "fixed action patterns", we have nothing to discuss.Heronblade said:Interesting. the line between pre-programmed and learned behavior has blurred somewhat in recent decades, but last I checked, theorems on the nature of instinct still play a major role in related fields. To my knowledge, there is no denial of it as a factor of human and animal behavior from any significant portion of the involved researchers.Blood Brain Barrier said:I don't believe in instinct. Everything we do is instinct, from eating to talking about the latest Batman movie. It's a 19th century concept, very much outdated.Heronblade said:empathy of that sort is quite explainable by deep rooted subconscious instinct (yes, instinct, we do still have a few of those), no need to read more into it unless given information that doesn't fit that profile.Blood Brain Barrier said:I wouldn't rule out a degree of telepathy already existing. We haven't identified the phenomenon but if you watch crowd behavior and sporting events as well as the way people interact, it seems possible given some imagination.
EDIT: Perhaps I should clarify. The term instinct itself is somewhat in disfavor for no good reasons that I have heard. However the unwieldy term "fixed action patterns" embraces the same concepts. I don't tend to care about changes in jargon that are both inconvenient and pointless.
Uh, that was the point of that last paragraph, I don't like or use the phrase in spite of it being more accurate as far as the scientific community is concerned, it is an unnecessary complication of a simple concept.Blood Brain Barrier said:I'm not asking what the "involved researchers" think, I'm asking what you think. I was hoping to have a discussion but if you want to throw around big words and phrases like "fixed action patterns", we have nothing to discuss.
I don't doubt that, but if what you call 'conscious behavior' is driven or influenced at a primordial level by a kind of pre-programmed instinct, then there is no point drawing a distinction between conscious and unconscious behavior.Heronblade said:Uh, that was the point of that last paragraph, I don't like or use the phrase in spite of it being more accurate as far as the scientific community is concerned, it is an unnecessary complication of a simple concept.Blood Brain Barrier said:I'm not asking what the "involved researchers" think, I'm asking what you think. I was hoping to have a discussion but if you want to throw around big words and phrases like "fixed action patterns", we have nothing to discuss.
As to what I think, I have worked closely with a wide variety of animals in the past, and have personally seen examples of unconscious and unlearned responses in dozens of different species over the years, and seen their parallels in humanity as well. Whether you choose to call it instinct or something else, pre-programmed behavior is very much an aspect of our lives.
Pretty much this, though there'd also be a ton of negatives. Some very, very dangerous secrets could easily be circulated for instance.The_Great_Galendo said:If all humans were literal mind readers, things would be a lot different. At the very least, crime would be virtually nonexistent, and people as a whole would be probably be a lot nicer. You could pick up hitchhikers or bring home homeless people for a night without worry, for instance, and a million other things as well. You'd have no privacy -- but you'd also never do anything of which you were ashamed, either. And a bunch of things that seem strange or perverted now would become socially acceptable once people realized that everyone has a few harmless fetishes.
I'm not saying it'd be an absolute utopia, but it'd probably be a lot better than the world we have now.
Politics would be super dooper hardAylaine said:I'm thinking relationships would be much more boring. Safer, but boring. You would lose out on the "learning" aspect. Now that I think about it, everything from sports to debates would likely be safer, but less exciting. xD