The thought "I dislike this movie/book/game/etc, it should never have been made" has always struck me as odd.
For example, I'm not a big fan of shooters and as such I can't say I'm a fan of the Halo series. So if I hear that there's going to be a Halo 4 (just for supposition, cool your jets anti-fanboys) a part of me wants to say "Why are they making another Halo? That's just stupid." However, when I think rationally about this response I wonder why I should have this reaction. Obviously whether the game comes out or not doesn't directly affect me in the least as I'm not going to buy the game and support it's creators and it's not like Master Chief is going to put a gun (a large pink one, that appears to be made by Mattel) to my head and demand I buy it. And hey, maybe someone out there will really enjoy the game, who am I to take that from them.
It's the same logic behind the roasting of Harry Potter books, but they go a step further and actually buy the books they're going to burn. A bit of a mixed message to the publishing company.
So, does anyone else have this kind of reasoning, if so why? Is it a position based on arrogance and elitism or is there something else going on?
For example, I'm not a big fan of shooters and as such I can't say I'm a fan of the Halo series. So if I hear that there's going to be a Halo 4 (just for supposition, cool your jets anti-fanboys) a part of me wants to say "Why are they making another Halo? That's just stupid." However, when I think rationally about this response I wonder why I should have this reaction. Obviously whether the game comes out or not doesn't directly affect me in the least as I'm not going to buy the game and support it's creators and it's not like Master Chief is going to put a gun (a large pink one, that appears to be made by Mattel) to my head and demand I buy it. And hey, maybe someone out there will really enjoy the game, who am I to take that from them.
It's the same logic behind the roasting of Harry Potter books, but they go a step further and actually buy the books they're going to burn. A bit of a mixed message to the publishing company.
So, does anyone else have this kind of reasoning, if so why? Is it a position based on arrogance and elitism or is there something else going on?