Adobe Blasts Apple Over iPad

Nuke_em_05

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2009
828
0
21
Flash is the one thing I wish my iPhone did.

Want to use flash? There's an app for... oh.

So.... what is the ipad supposed to be? A big iphone without the phone? A netbook without the capability to run over 3/4 of internet content? A home PC without any functionality?

or...

A giant cash-cow for apple?
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
It doesn't "make sense". I makes sense if you want to bash your clients over the head with the idea that you want to suck them dry financially. Hey, why not make every page in the internet also only available if you buy them? Make us pay a cent every time we play a song too. That would make a fortune, it "makes sense".
 

Dudemeister

New member
Feb 24, 2008
1,227
0
0
redmarine said:
Finally Apple has made a good decision. Somebody has to destroy Flash and start the HTML 5 movement.
Yes, I'm sure that's why they're doing it, to advance HTML...
 

Discord

Monk of Tranquility
Nov 1, 2009
1,988
0
0
The deal breaker for me was the lack of a real typeing system. But I guess that's my fault for thinking it would be like a netbook or a XL Ipod Touch version of the imac.
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
I don't understand why they'd expose themselves to the ridicule though. The first mockups of a large ipod touch have been around the internet for years. Why make a huge deal out of something everyone already thought of but dismissed as a bad idea? Jesus, Steeve, I can't even open my maps client and see my e-mails at the same time? Its clearly not because the processor can't handle it, this is a 1 gig processor. The Nexus One can do multitasking with a processor of the same size and the N1 is a goddamn phone.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
Adobe isn't just howling at the moon with this one. They're views is a particularly heavy hailstone in the storm of huh, wuh and, zuh which followed the release of the iPad [please forgive the horrible metaphor as I am desperately sleep-deprived]

Suffice it to say, the iPad is far from the max[ie]
 

Gnoya

New member
Mar 28, 2009
36
0
0
Deal breaker right there alone... among other things.. but this is pretty big example of protectionism
 

qbanknight

New member
Apr 15, 2009
669
0
0
someone's a lil pissy for not being invited to apple's super awesome party. granted i'm lambasting the fact that they'll release a statement to ***** about it. even though i agree that any of apple's products should have flash support. i mean regular macs allow it, why not for my ipod touch (screw the iPad, it has no right to exist)
 

Sahasrahla

New member
Nov 18, 2009
71
0
0
Um... Is anyone surprised? This is the established business model that Apple used to dominate the mp3 market with the iPod:

1) make a shiny new device that's at least as much form as function
2) include failsafes designed to steer its user towards Apple content
3) PROFIT

It's blatant protectionism, and shame on you for believing that Apple makes this shit out of the kindness of their hearts.

They want your money. They will do some pretty dicky things to ensure they get it. Because they're a corporate interest. Moving on.
 

Daezd

New member
Mar 1, 2008
343
0
0
Dawwwwwww, chunky iPod is adorable and totally useless!



:[


But adorable!
 

solidstatemind

Digital Oracle
Nov 9, 2008
1,077
0
0
I think Apple just fucked up. Badly.

Not only is this thing just a big iTouch with a snicker-inducing name, explain to me why this isn't way worse than what MS did in the United States v. Microsoft [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_anti-trust_case] case.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Booooo.

Hissss.

Etc.

I wasn't really all interested in the first place, but the more I hear about this thing the more I feel that it's going to flop fantastically.
 

teh_spartan

ultimate pwnerer
Mar 29, 2009
139
0
0
this is what we (every one i know) want http://www.modbook.com

and

THIS IS WHAT WE GET AN IPOD THAT WONT FIT IN YOUR POCKET. WHY WOULD I GET A IPAD WITH 3G IF I AM NEVER GOING TO USE IT OUT SIDE MY HOME OR A PLACE WITH WIFI
 

NamesAreHardToPick

New member
Jan 7, 2010
177
0
0
solidstatemind said:
I think Apple just fucked up. Badly.

Not only is this thing just a big iTouch with a snicker-inducing name, explain to me why this isn't way worse than what MS did in the United States v. Microsoft [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_anti-trust_case] case.
It's one thing to monopolize your own hardware and leave competitors free to produce a rival hardware platform. That's basically what game consoles are. It's totally different when you've got a virtual monopoly over all PC hardware regardless of manufacturer, and lever that position to knock off competitors in different software markets.

Excluding Flash sort of sucks for Apple customers, on the other hand don't you think it's a little obnoxious for "75% of the internet" to rely on one proprietary format?
 

teh_spartan

ultimate pwnerer
Mar 29, 2009
139
0
0
ya definetly how am i suppost to look at porn vids on my ipad if there is no flash that means that i would have to download them and my girl friend might find them. it would be a disaster!
 

tk1989

New member
May 20, 2008
865
0
0
Snotnarok said:
Not like I had any plan of buying this ItouchHD
Its not even HD. The iPad has fewer DPI than the iphone/itouch.
teh_spartan said:
ya definetly how am i suppost to look at porn vids on my ipad if there is no flash that means that i would have to download them and my girl friend might find them. it would be a disaster!
The iPad wil still support Quicktime videos, so you are in luck lol
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
... This is why PC is better. It basically lets you do whatever the fuck you want on it.

Mostly becuase they don't have such a deathgrip on their stuff.

Appletards.

Now even more pretentious than it already is, Ipad says, "Iz dontz needz noz youztoobz!