Well, the only "adult" comics I've read are The Walking Dead, Watchmen, and some stuff by Frank Miller. And seeing as the first two have already been recommended, I guess that makes me the Frank Miller guy...
Ah, in that sense it works. I thought you were saying the sexual aspects were fetishistic, in the creepy hentai sense.WarpZone said:By "fetishistic" I just meant it fetishizes the imagery surrounding its subject matter, kinda like The Matrix or Kill Bill. I didn't mean that it's actually about fetishes. Most horror movies, low-budget and otherwise, tend to fetishize their subject matter, but only in the aesthetic sense of the word.Owyn_Merrilin said:From what I've seen of it (so a couple of issues of the comic, plus a heavily edited for TV version of the movie) it's crass, but I wouldn't use the word fetishistic. It's the comic equivalent of a low budget horror movie; lots of boobs and blood.
Careful. Lost Girls, although considered a seminal classic by many comic book collectors, is a coming-of-age story, and as such is currently illegal to own if you live in the U.S.Gottesstrafe said:Try Lost Girls by Alan Moore. You'll know when you see it...
If it's illegal for the reason I think you're saying it is, it's actually legal in the US; drawings are protected under the first amendment. In Canada, on the other hand...WarpZone said:Careful. Lost Girls, although considered a seminal classic by many comic book collectors, is a coming-of-age story, and as such is currently illegal to own if you live in the U.S.Gottesstrafe said:Try Lost Girls by Alan Moore. You'll know when you see it...
I've read a bit of Oglaf. The sex scenes are, at best, only sexy until the punchline, which is almost always funny but severely boner-withering. I'm thinking of the snow queen plotline...WarpZone said:Oh yeah! I forgot about Oglaf! It takes itself a smidge more seriously than XXXenophile, so the sex scenes actually look sexy. It looks so much like Platinum Grit (a great rambling adult-subject-matter high-octane modern mythology romp in its own right) that I'm pretty sure it's by the same author, even if he doesn't like to advertise the fact.A. Smith said:Google "Oglaf". It's a weekly webcomic (published sundays) that can get very graphic (though it sometimes stays in PG realms) and is always hilarious. Very well drawn too.
This. Oglaf is sex comedy rather than porn, and just comedy more often than not. Very well drawn, does no fan service whatsoever (which is weird for a comic full of naked wommin) and an incredibly sharp sense of humor.A. Smith said:Google "Oglaf". It's a weekly webcomic (published sundays) that can get very graphic (though it sometimes stays in PG realms) and is always hilarious. Very well drawn too.
that's not true it all depends on what you are reading I mean Berserk is extremely mature and really doesn't shy away from any content or Spawn is the same way that's a comic that really isn't afraid to get graphic either.TestECull said:Sadly, you're not going to find it outside of porno, mainly because if someone tried to slip a harmless nip or two into a mainstream comic they'd be sued to hell.
Nope. The PROTECT Act changed all that. You literally can't doodle some tits on a sketch pad in your own home without technically breaking the law. If federal prosecutors say "This looks underage to me," then it counts as child pornography, and you can be prosecuted, no matter what the actual drawing looks like, even if it's just a stick figure. So far, it's only been used to prosecute cases where the defendant was suspected of committing other, real-world sex crimes, but there's no reason to assume they won't target comic collectors in general, once the law has been upheld in court. Not sure, but I think the goal of this legislation was to crack down on sales of hentai in America, and stuff like 4chan, which are probably seen as a political embarrassment among the so-called moral majority.Owyn_Merrilin said:If it's illegal for the reason I think you're saying it is, it's actually legal in the US; drawings are protected under the first amendment. In Canada, on the other hand...WarpZone said:Careful. Lost Girls, although considered a seminal classic by many comic book collectors, is a coming-of-age story, and as such is currently illegal to own if you live in the U.S.Gottesstrafe said:Try Lost Girls by Alan Moore. You'll know when you see it...
He said a mainstream comic. He means stuff like Superman and X-Men. Not trade paperbacks by Dark Horse or something.Ultratwinkie said:Actually nudity in comics are common. Little children don't normally go for comics like they used to. Its a market for adults now.TestECull said:Sadly, you're not going to find it outside of porno, mainly because if someone tried to slip a harmless nip or two into a mainstream comic they'd be sued to hell.
Federal law doesn't trump the constitution, though. However, It looks like the case law is conflicting on the matter; there's two rulings on the subject, one which calls it unconstitutional, and another which upholds it. It's probably better to play it safe than to be sorry, but at some point, this is going to need to be challenged; it's patently unconstitutional, especially since child porn is only illegal in the first place because actual children have to be harmed to make it.WarpZone said:Nope. The PROTECT Act changed all that. You literally can't doodle some tits on a sketch pad in your own home without technically breaking the law. If federal prosecutors say "This looks underage to me," then it counts as child pornography, and you can be prosecuted, even if it's just a stick figure. So far, it's only been used to prosecute cases where the defendant was suspected of committing other, real-world sex crimes, but there's no reason to assume they won't target comic collectors in general, once the law has been upheld in court. Not sure, but I think the goal of this legislation was to crack down on sales of hentai in America, and stuff like 4chan, which are probably seen as a political embarrassment among the so-called moral majority.Owyn_Merrilin said:If it's illegal for the reason I think you're saying it is, it's actually legal in the US; drawings are protected under the first amendment. In Canada, on the other hand...WarpZone said:Careful. Lost Girls, although considered a seminal classic by many comic book collectors, is a coming-of-age story, and as such is currently illegal to own if you live in the U.S.Gottesstrafe said:Try Lost Girls by Alan Moore. You'll know when you see it...
A friend in Canada tells me they have provincial laws with similar restrictions, but they tend to target sales, not possession, and seem to be less heavy-handed about enforcement. Your millage may vary. When in doubt, ask a local lawyer.
Yeah, it probably won't be an issue in the immediate future for most comic book fans, and hopefully it'll get struck down eventually, but I didn't want someone reading this thread to go out and buy it or start doing Google searches on it without knowing what they might be getting themselves into, long-term, if the worst comes to pass. Technically, hand-drawn child porn is currently illegal in the United States, and so is any drawing that a federal prosecutor chooses to interpret as child porn. Thank you George Dubbya Bush.Owyn_Merrilin said:Federal law doesn't trump the constitution, though. However, It looks like the case law is conflicting on the matter; there's two rulings on the subject, one which calls it unconstitutional, and another which upholds it. It's probably better to play it safe than to be sorry, but at some point, this is going to need to be challenged; it's patently unconstitutional, especially since child porn is only illegal in the first place because actual children have to be harmed to make it.WarpZone said:Nope. The PROTECT Act changed all that. You literally can't doodle some tits on a sketch pad in your own home without technically breaking the law. If federal prosecutors say "This looks underage to me," then it counts as child pornography, and you can be prosecuted, even if it's just a stick figure. So far, it's only been used to prosecute cases where the defendant was suspected of committing other, real-world sex crimes, but there's no reason to assume they won't target comic collectors in general, once the law has been upheld in court. Not sure, but I think the goal of this legislation was to crack down on sales of hentai in America, and stuff like 4chan, which are probably seen as a political embarrassment among the so-called moral majority.Owyn_Merrilin said:If it's illegal for the reason I think you're saying it is, it's actually legal in the US; drawings are protected under the first amendment. In Canada, on the other hand...WarpZone said:Careful. Lost Girls, although considered a seminal classic by many comic book collectors, is a coming-of-age story, and as such is currently illegal to own if you live in the U.S.Gottesstrafe said:Try Lost Girls by Alan Moore. You'll know when you see it...
A friend in Canada tells me they have provincial laws with similar restrictions, but they tend to target sales, not possession, and seem to be less heavy-handed about enforcement. Your millage may vary. When in doubt, ask a local lawyer.