altnameJag said:
Status Nil seems to think that if somebody routinely bashes bad representation or poor writing or what have you in games with a sexual bent, that means it's somehow a double standard if they have anything nice to say about a different game with the same broad (broad) themes.
Not quite, but please don't be discouraged. The subtle arguments Trained Cultural Critics like Professor Nil make often take years of deep immersion in theory to fully appreciate. In this case, an informed reading would probably be something along these lines:
"If some (busy)bodies routinely make a show of
condemning the alleged
misogyny of various popular culture artifacts based on the supposed
harm created by the exposure of the general populace to representations they contain, it is somewhat suspect when they fail to apply the same standard of
harm to more explicitly
problematic tropes, such as the notorious
"Not If they enjoyed it" Rationalization [footnote] http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NotIfTheyEnjoyedItRationalization[/footnote], specifically in works created by personal friends. Some would even suspect the simultaneous operation of
multiple standards in the ongoing work of such critics."
This at any rate is my understanding. Nil's work remains opaque and challenging.
Ogoid said:
Or he might be suspicious of his motives, since Grayson, paragon of journalistic ethics that he is, has been known for "having anything nice" to say about games made by personal friends and/or lovers without feeling the need to let his readers be aware of said relationships.
Some do get it, though.